The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication errors and adverse drug events.

Q4 Medicine
Journal of Health Care Finance Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Fatimah Ali Al-Rowibah, Mustafa Z Younis, Jai Parkash
{"title":"The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication errors and adverse drug events.","authors":"Fatimah Ali Al-Rowibah,&nbsp;Mustafa Z Younis,&nbsp;Jai Parkash","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) are common, costly, and clinically important problems. This research was conducted to determine whether computerized physician order entry (CPOE) improves the quality of care by increasing patient safety and decreasing medication errors at the King Fahad Medical City Hospital (KFMCH) of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized a cross-sectional research design. Questionnaires were distributed to physicians in various departments who used the system for more than six months. The study was conducted in Riyadh at KFMCH, which is the largest medical complex hospital in the Middle East, in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Ninety-three physicians participated in the study; the response rate was 31 percent. Only descriptive analyses were conducted. Results showed that 88 percent of the physicians agreed that the use of CPOE improved their performance and 76 percent reported that the use of CPOE increased their productivity. In addition, 56 percent of the participants agreed that CPOE was a simple system and 64 percent reported that it was easy to use. However, 44 percent of the physicians agreed that CPOE lacked a user guide during medication ordering and 55 percent reported that it created new types of errors. Results showed that 234 physicians always changed their order, 179 physicians changed their order often, 175 physicians rarely changed their order, and 74 physicians never changed their order. Furthermore, 72 percent of the physicians agreed that CPOE helped them to decrease ADEs. Finally, 91 percent of the physicians agreed that CPOE reduced errors related to hand-written prescriptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Finance","volume":"40 1","pages":"93-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) are common, costly, and clinically important problems. This research was conducted to determine whether computerized physician order entry (CPOE) improves the quality of care by increasing patient safety and decreasing medication errors at the King Fahad Medical City Hospital (KFMCH) of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Methods: The study utilized a cross-sectional research design. Questionnaires were distributed to physicians in various departments who used the system for more than six months. The study was conducted in Riyadh at KFMCH, which is the largest medical complex hospital in the Middle East, in the outpatient setting.

Key findings: Ninety-three physicians participated in the study; the response rate was 31 percent. Only descriptive analyses were conducted. Results showed that 88 percent of the physicians agreed that the use of CPOE improved their performance and 76 percent reported that the use of CPOE increased their productivity. In addition, 56 percent of the participants agreed that CPOE was a simple system and 64 percent reported that it was easy to use. However, 44 percent of the physicians agreed that CPOE lacked a user guide during medication ordering and 55 percent reported that it created new types of errors. Results showed that 234 physicians always changed their order, 179 physicians changed their order often, 175 physicians rarely changed their order, and 74 physicians never changed their order. Furthermore, 72 percent of the physicians agreed that CPOE helped them to decrease ADEs. Finally, 91 percent of the physicians agreed that CPOE reduced errors related to hand-written prescriptions.

计算机化医嘱输入对用药错误和药物不良事件的影响。
目的:药物错误和药物不良事件(ADEs)是常见的,昂贵的,临床上重要的问题。本研究旨在确定计算机化医嘱录入系统(CPOE)是否通过提高沙特阿拉伯王国法赫德国王医疗城市医院(KFMCH)的患者安全性和减少用药错误来改善护理质量。方法:采用横断面研究设计。调查问卷被分发给使用该系统超过6个月的各个科室的医生。这项研究是在利雅得的KFMCH进行的,这是中东最大的综合医疗医院,在门诊环境中进行的。主要发现:93名医生参与了研究;回复率为31%。只进行了描述性分析。结果显示,88%的医生同意使用CPOE提高了他们的表现,76%的医生报告说使用CPOE提高了他们的工作效率。此外,56%的参与者认为CPOE是一个简单的系统,64%的参与者报告说它易于使用。然而,44%的医生认为CPOE在药物订购过程中缺乏用户指南,55%的医生报告说它造成了新的错误类型。结果显示:经常改变医嘱的有234人,经常改变医嘱的有179人,很少改变医嘱的有175人,从不改变医嘱的有74人。此外,72%的医生认为CPOE有助于他们减少不良事件。最后,91%的医生同意CPOE减少了与手写处方相关的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Finance
Journal of Health Care Finance Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Finance is the only quarterly journal devoted solely to helping you meet your facility"s financial goals. Each issue targets a key area of health care finance. Stay alert to new trends, opportunities, and threats. Make easier, better decisions, with advice from industry experts. Learn from the experiences of other health care organizations. Experts in the field share their experiences on successful programs, proven strategies, practical management tools, and innovative alternatives. The Journal covers today"s most complex dollars-and-cents issues, including hospital/physician contracts, alternative delivery systems, generating maximum margins under PPS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信