Social, economic, and health utility considerations in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Emilio Sacco, Daniele Tienforti, Alessandro D'Addessi, Francesco Pinto, Marco Racioppi, Angelo Totaro, Daniele D'Agostino, Francesco Marangi, Pierfrancesco Bassi
{"title":"Social, economic, and health utility considerations in the treatment of overactive bladder.","authors":"Emilio Sacco,&nbsp;Daniele Tienforti,&nbsp;Alessandro D'Addessi,&nbsp;Francesco Pinto,&nbsp;Marco Racioppi,&nbsp;Angelo Totaro,&nbsp;Daniele D'Agostino,&nbsp;Francesco Marangi,&nbsp;Pierfrancesco Bassi","doi":"10.2147/rru.s4166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Overactive bladder (OAB) is a highly prevalent urinary syndrome with a profound impact on quality of life (QoL) of affected patients and their family because of its adverse effects on social, sexual, interpersonal, and professional function. Cost-of-illness analyses showed the huge economic burden related to OAB for patients, public healthcare systems, and society, secondary to both direct and indirect costs; however, intangible costs related to QoL impact are usually omitted from these analyses. Recently many novel treatment modalities have been introduced and the need to apply the modern methodology of health technology assessment to these treatment strategies was immediately clear in order to evaluate objectively their value in term of both improvement in length/quality of life and costs. Health utilities are instruments that allow a measurement of QoL and its integration in the economic evaluation using the quality-adjusted life-years model and cost-utility analysis. The development of suitable instruments for quantifying utility in the specific group of OAB patients is vitally important to extend the application of cost-utility analysis in OAB and to guide healthcare resources allocation for this disorder. Studies are required to define the cost-effectiveness of available pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapy options for this disorder. </p>","PeriodicalId":19572,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Urology","volume":"2 ","pages":"11-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/rru.s4166","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/rru.s4166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a highly prevalent urinary syndrome with a profound impact on quality of life (QoL) of affected patients and their family because of its adverse effects on social, sexual, interpersonal, and professional function. Cost-of-illness analyses showed the huge economic burden related to OAB for patients, public healthcare systems, and society, secondary to both direct and indirect costs; however, intangible costs related to QoL impact are usually omitted from these analyses. Recently many novel treatment modalities have been introduced and the need to apply the modern methodology of health technology assessment to these treatment strategies was immediately clear in order to evaluate objectively their value in term of both improvement in length/quality of life and costs. Health utilities are instruments that allow a measurement of QoL and its integration in the economic evaluation using the quality-adjusted life-years model and cost-utility analysis. The development of suitable instruments for quantifying utility in the specific group of OAB patients is vitally important to extend the application of cost-utility analysis in OAB and to guide healthcare resources allocation for this disorder. Studies are required to define the cost-effectiveness of available pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapy options for this disorder.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

膀胱过动症治疗的社会、经济和健康效用考虑。
膀胱过动症(OAB)是一种非常普遍的泌尿系统综合征,由于其对社会、性、人际和职业功能的不良影响,对患者及其家庭的生活质量(QoL)产生了深远的影响。疾病成本分析显示,OAB给患者、公共卫生系统和社会带来的巨大经济负担,仅次于直接和间接成本;然而,与生活质量影响相关的无形成本通常在这些分析中被忽略。最近引进了许多新的治疗方式,需要立即将现代卫生技术评估方法应用于这些治疗策略,以便客观地评估它们在改善生命长度/质量和成本方面的价值。保健效用是一种工具,可以使用质量调整生命年模型和成本效用分析来衡量生活质量并将其纳入经济评估。开发合适的工具来量化OAB患者特定群体的效用,对于扩展成本效用分析在OAB中的应用和指导这种疾病的医疗资源分配至关重要。需要研究来确定这种疾病可用的药物和非药物治疗方案的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信