Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine.

Open Access Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2011-02-04 eCollection Date: 2011-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJU.S16637
Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, Thomas Uncini
{"title":"Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine.","authors":"Marty Hinz,&nbsp;Alvin Stein,&nbsp;Thomas Uncini","doi":"10.2147/OAJU.S16637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to present the results of statistical analysis of spot baseline urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine assays in correlation with spot baseline urinary serotonin and dopamine findings previously published by the authors. Our research indicates a need for physicians and decision-makers to understand the lack of validity of this type of spot baseline monoamine testing when using it in the decision-making process for neurotransmitter deficiency disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Matched-pairs t-tests were performed for a group of subjects for whom spot baseline urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine assays were performed on samples collected on different days then paired by subject.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reported laboratory test results for urinary serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine, obtained on different days from the same subjects, differed significantly and were not reproducible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spot baseline monoamine assays, in subjects not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor, such as pheochromocytoma or carcinoid syndrome, are of no value in decision-making due to this day-to-day variability and lack of reproducibility. While there have been attempts to integrate spot baseline urinary monoamine assays into treatment of peripheral or central neurotransmitter-associated disease states, diagnosis of neurotransmitter imbalances, and biomarker applications, significant differences in day-to-day reproducibility make this impossible given the known science as it exists today.</p>","PeriodicalId":19572,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Urology","volume":"3 ","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJU.S16637","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJU.S16637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this paper is to present the results of statistical analysis of spot baseline urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine assays in correlation with spot baseline urinary serotonin and dopamine findings previously published by the authors. Our research indicates a need for physicians and decision-makers to understand the lack of validity of this type of spot baseline monoamine testing when using it in the decision-making process for neurotransmitter deficiency disorders.

Methods: Matched-pairs t-tests were performed for a group of subjects for whom spot baseline urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine assays were performed on samples collected on different days then paired by subject.

Results: The reported laboratory test results for urinary serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine, obtained on different days from the same subjects, differed significantly and were not reproducible.

Conclusion: Spot baseline monoamine assays, in subjects not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor, such as pheochromocytoma or carcinoid syndrome, are of no value in decision-making due to this day-to-day variability and lack of reproducibility. While there have been attempts to integrate spot baseline urinary monoamine assays into treatment of peripheral or central neurotransmitter-associated disease states, diagnosis of neurotransmitter imbalances, and biomarker applications, significant differences in day-to-day reproducibility make this impossible given the known science as it exists today.

尿神经递质测试:考虑点基线去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素。
背景:本文的目的是统计分析现场基线尿去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素测定与现场基线尿血清素和多巴胺相关的结果。我们的研究表明,医生和决策者需要了解在神经递质缺乏性疾病的决策过程中使用这种类型的现场基线单胺测试时缺乏有效性。方法:对一组受试者进行配对t检验,对不同日期采集的样本进行点基线尿去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素测定,然后按受试者配对。结果:报告的尿血清素、多巴胺、去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素的实验室检测结果,在不同的日子从同一受试者获得,有显著差异,不可重复。结论:在未患单胺分泌肿瘤(如嗜铬细胞瘤或类癌综合征)的受试者中,现场基线单胺检测在决策中没有价值,因为这种日常的变异性和缺乏可重复性。虽然已经有人尝试将尿单胺的现场基线检测整合到外周或中枢神经递质相关疾病的治疗、神经递质失衡的诊断和生物标志物的应用中,但鉴于现有的已知科学,日常可重复性的显著差异使得这是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信