Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks.

Md Fahmid Islam, Md Moinul Hoque, Rajat Suvra Banik, Sanjoy Roy, Sharmin Sultana Sumi, F M Nazmul Hassan, Md Tauhid Siddiki Tomal, Ahmad Ullah, K M Taufiqur Rahman
{"title":"Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks.","authors":"Md Fahmid Islam, Md Moinul Hoque, Rajat Suvra Banik, Sanjoy Roy, Sharmin Sultana Sumi, F M Nazmul Hassan, Md Tauhid Siddiki Tomal, Ahmad Ullah, K M Taufiqur Rahman","doi":"10.1186/2043-9113-3-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties, the analysis of differential modularity between normal and cancer protein interaction networks can be a good way to understand cancer more significantly. Two aspects of biological network modularity e.g. detection of molecular complexes (potential modules or clusters) and identification of crucial nodes forming the overlapping modules have been considered in this regard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the current study, the computational analysis of previously published protein interaction networks (PINs) has been conducted to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks. Protein molecules involved in ten major cancer signal transduction pathways were used to construct the networks based on expression data of five tissues e.g. bone, breast, colon, kidney and liver in both normal and cancer conditions. MCODE (molecular complex detection) and ModuLand methods have been used to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In case of all tissues, cancer PINs show higher level of clustering (formation of molecular complexes) than the normal ones. In contrast, lower level modular overlapping is found in cancer PINs than the normal ones. Thus a proposition can be made regarding the formation of some giant nodes in the cancer networks with very high degree and resulting in reduced overlapping among the network modules though the predicted molecular complex numbers are higher in cancer conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study predicts some major molecular complexes that might act as the important regulators in cancer progression. The crucial nodes identified in this study can be potential drug targets to combat cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":73663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","volume":" ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-3-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties, the analysis of differential modularity between normal and cancer protein interaction networks can be a good way to understand cancer more significantly. Two aspects of biological network modularity e.g. detection of molecular complexes (potential modules or clusters) and identification of crucial nodes forming the overlapping modules have been considered in this regard.

Methods: In the current study, the computational analysis of previously published protein interaction networks (PINs) has been conducted to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks. Protein molecules involved in ten major cancer signal transduction pathways were used to construct the networks based on expression data of five tissues e.g. bone, breast, colon, kidney and liver in both normal and cancer conditions. MCODE (molecular complex detection) and ModuLand methods have been used to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks respectively.

Results: In case of all tissues, cancer PINs show higher level of clustering (formation of molecular complexes) than the normal ones. In contrast, lower level modular overlapping is found in cancer PINs than the normal ones. Thus a proposition can be made regarding the formation of some giant nodes in the cancer networks with very high degree and resulting in reduced overlapping among the network modules though the predicted molecular complex numbers are higher in cancer conditions.

Conclusion: The study predicts some major molecular complexes that might act as the important regulators in cancer progression. The crucial nodes identified in this study can be potential drug targets to combat cancer.

组织特异性正常和癌症蛋白质相互作用网络中不同网络模块化的比较分析。
背景:与正常情况相比,癌症在细胞和亚细胞水平上发生了复杂而动态的变化,对这种变化的大规模了解促进了近代网络生物学等复杂系统方法的出现。由于大多数生物网络都显示出模块化特性,因此分析正常和癌症蛋白质相互作用网络之间的不同模块化特性,是更深入了解癌症的好方法。在这方面,我们考虑了生物网络模块性的两个方面,即分子复合物(潜在模块或集群)的检测和形成重叠模块的关键节点的识别:本研究对之前发表的蛋白质相互作用网络(PINs)进行了计算分析,以确定网络中的分子复合物和关键节点。根据骨、乳腺、结肠、肾脏和肝脏等五种组织在正常和癌症状态下的表达数据,利用涉及十种主要癌症信号转导通路的蛋白质分子构建网络。MCODE(分子复合物检测)和 ModuLand 方法分别用于识别分子复合物和网络的关键节点:结果:在所有组织中,癌症 PINs 都比正常 PINs 显示出更高水平的聚类(形成分子复合物)。相比之下,癌症 PIN 的模块重叠程度低于正常 PIN。因此,虽然预测的分子复合物数量在癌症情况下更高,但可以得出结论:癌症网络中形成了一些巨型节点,其程度非常高,导致网络模块之间的重叠减少:本研究预测了一些主要的分子复合体,它们可能是癌症进展的重要调节因素。结论:本研究预测了一些主要的分子复合体,它们可能是癌症进展过程中的重要调控因素。本研究中发现的关键节点可能是抗击癌症的潜在药物靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信