Asthma patients' inability to use a pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) correctly correlates with poor asthma control as defined by the global initiative for asthma (GINA) strategy: a retrospective analysis.

Mark L Levy, Alison Hardwell, Eddie McKnight, John Holmes
{"title":"Asthma patients' inability to use a pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) correctly correlates with poor asthma control as defined by the global initiative for asthma (GINA) strategy: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Mark L Levy,&nbsp;Alison Hardwell,&nbsp;Eddie McKnight,&nbsp;John Holmes","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In practice it is logical that inhalers are prescribed only after patients have received training and demonstrated their ability to use the device. However, many patients are unable to use their pressurised metered-dose inhaler devices (pMDIs) correctly. We assessed the relationship between asthma control and patients' ability to use their prescribed pMDIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evaluation of 3,981 (46% male) primary care asthma patient reviews, which included inhaler technique and asthma control, by specialist nurses in primary care in 2009. The paper focuses on people currently prescribed pMDI devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accurate data on reliever and preventer inhaler prescriptions were available for 3,686 and 2,887 patients, respectively. In patients prescribed reliever inhalers, 2,375 (64%) and 525 (14%) were on pMDI alone or pMDI plus spacer, respectively. For those prescribed preventers, 1,976 (68%) and 171 (6%) were using a pMDI without and with a spacer, respectively. Asthma was controlled in 50% of patients reviewed. The majority of patients (60% of 3,686) were using reliever pMDIs, 13% with spacers. Incorrect pMDI use was associated with poor asthma control (p<0.0001) and more short burst systemic steroid prescriptions in the last year (p=0.038). Of patients using beclometasone (the most frequently prescribed preventer drug in our sample), significantly more of those using a breath-actuated pMDI device (p<0.0001) and a spacer (p<0.0001) were controlled compared with those on pMDIs alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who are able to use pMDIs correctly have better asthma control as defined by the GINA strategy document. Beclometasone via a spacer or breath-actuated device resulted in better asthma control than via a pMDI alone. Patients prescribed pMDIs should be carefully instructed in technique and have their ability to use these devices tested; those unable to use the device should be prescribed a spacer or an alternative device such as one that is breath-actuated.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00084","citationCount":"125","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

Abstract

Background: In practice it is logical that inhalers are prescribed only after patients have received training and demonstrated their ability to use the device. However, many patients are unable to use their pressurised metered-dose inhaler devices (pMDIs) correctly. We assessed the relationship between asthma control and patients' ability to use their prescribed pMDIs.

Methods: Evaluation of 3,981 (46% male) primary care asthma patient reviews, which included inhaler technique and asthma control, by specialist nurses in primary care in 2009. The paper focuses on people currently prescribed pMDI devices.

Results: Accurate data on reliever and preventer inhaler prescriptions were available for 3,686 and 2,887 patients, respectively. In patients prescribed reliever inhalers, 2,375 (64%) and 525 (14%) were on pMDI alone or pMDI plus spacer, respectively. For those prescribed preventers, 1,976 (68%) and 171 (6%) were using a pMDI without and with a spacer, respectively. Asthma was controlled in 50% of patients reviewed. The majority of patients (60% of 3,686) were using reliever pMDIs, 13% with spacers. Incorrect pMDI use was associated with poor asthma control (p<0.0001) and more short burst systemic steroid prescriptions in the last year (p=0.038). Of patients using beclometasone (the most frequently prescribed preventer drug in our sample), significantly more of those using a breath-actuated pMDI device (p<0.0001) and a spacer (p<0.0001) were controlled compared with those on pMDIs alone.

Conclusions: Patients who are able to use pMDIs correctly have better asthma control as defined by the GINA strategy document. Beclometasone via a spacer or breath-actuated device resulted in better asthma control than via a pMDI alone. Patients prescribed pMDIs should be carefully instructed in technique and have their ability to use these devices tested; those unable to use the device should be prescribed a spacer or an alternative device such as one that is breath-actuated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

哮喘患者不能正确使用加压计量吸入器(pMDI)与全球哮喘行动(GINA)战略所定义的哮喘控制不良相关:一项回顾性分析。
背景:在实践中,只有在患者接受培训并证明他们有能力使用吸入器后才开吸入器是合乎逻辑的。然而,许多患者不能正确使用他们的加压计量吸入器(pmdi)。我们评估了哮喘控制与患者使用处方pmdi的能力之间的关系。方法:对2009年初级保健专科护士对3981例(46%男性)初级保健哮喘患者的评价,包括吸入器技术和哮喘控制。本文的重点是目前使用pMDI设备的人。结果:分别为3,686例和2,887例患者提供了缓解剂和预防剂吸入剂处方的准确数据。在处方缓解吸入器的患者中,分别有2375例(64%)和525例(14%)单独使用pMDI或pMDI加间隔剂。对于指定的防喷剂,分别有1976(68%)和171(6%)使用不带隔离剂和带隔离剂的pMDI。50%的患者哮喘得到控制。大多数患者(3686名患者中的60%)使用缓解性pmdi, 13%使用间隔剂。不正确使用pMDI与哮喘控制不良相关(结论:能够正确使用pMDI的患者具有GINA策略文件定义的更好的哮喘控制。通过间隔器或呼吸驱动装置使用倍氯米松比单独使用pMDI效果更好。处方pmdi的患者应在技术上仔细指导,并对其使用这些装置的能力进行测试;那些不能使用该设备的人应该开一个间隔器或一个替代设备,比如呼吸驱动的设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Primary Care Respiratory Journal PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信