What drives the 'August effect'? A observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work.

JRSM short reports Pub Date : 2013-07-05 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2042533313489823
John D Blakey, Andrew Fearn, Dominick E Shaw
{"title":"What drives the 'August effect'? A observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work.","authors":"John D Blakey,&nbsp;Andrew Fearn,&nbsp;Dominick E Shaw","doi":"10.1177/2042533313489823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether measurements of junior doctor on-call workload and performance can clarify the mechanisms underlying the increase in morbidity and mortality seen after junior doctor changeover: the 'August effect'.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative retrospective observational study of routinely collected data on junior doctor workload.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two large teaching hospitals in England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Task level data from a wireless out of hours system (n = 29,885 requests) used by medical staff, nurses, and allied health professionals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Number and type of tasks requested by nurses, time to completion of tasks by junior doctors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no overall change in the number of tasks requested by nurses out of hours around the August changeover (median requests per hour 15 before and 14 after, p = 0.46). However, the number of tasks classified as urgent was greater (p = 0.016) equating to five more urgent tasks per day. After changeover, doctors took less time to complete tasks overall due to a reduction in time taken for routine tasks (median 74 vs. 66 min; p = 3.9 × 10(-9)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that the 'August effect' is not due to new junior doctors completing tasks more slowly or having a greater workload. Further studies are required to investigate the causes of the increased number of urgent tasks seen, but likely factors are errors, omissions, and poor prioritization. Thus, improved training and quality control has the potential to address this increased duration of unresolved patient risk. The study also highlights the potential of newer technologies to facilitate quantitative study of clinical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":89182,"journal":{"name":"JRSM short reports","volume":"4 8","pages":"2042533313489823"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2042533313489823","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2042533313489823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether measurements of junior doctor on-call workload and performance can clarify the mechanisms underlying the increase in morbidity and mortality seen after junior doctor changeover: the 'August effect'.

Design: Quantitative retrospective observational study of routinely collected data on junior doctor workload.

Setting: Two large teaching hospitals in England.

Participants: Task level data from a wireless out of hours system (n = 29,885 requests) used by medical staff, nurses, and allied health professionals.

Main outcome measures: Number and type of tasks requested by nurses, time to completion of tasks by junior doctors.

Results: There was no overall change in the number of tasks requested by nurses out of hours around the August changeover (median requests per hour 15 before and 14 after, p = 0.46). However, the number of tasks classified as urgent was greater (p = 0.016) equating to five more urgent tasks per day. After changeover, doctors took less time to complete tasks overall due to a reduction in time taken for routine tasks (median 74 vs. 66 min; p = 3.9 × 10(-9)).

Conclusion: This study suggests that the 'August effect' is not due to new junior doctors completing tasks more slowly or having a greater workload. Further studies are required to investigate the causes of the increased number of urgent tasks seen, but likely factors are errors, omissions, and poor prioritization. Thus, improved training and quality control has the potential to address this increased duration of unresolved patient risk. The study also highlights the potential of newer technologies to facilitate quantitative study of clinical activity.

是什么推动了“八月效应”?初级医生更换对非工作时间工作影响的观察性研究。
目的:探讨初级医生值班工作量和工作表现的测量是否能阐明初级医生换岗后发病率和死亡率增加的机制:“八月效应”。设计:对常规收集的初级医生工作量数据进行定量回顾性观察研究。环境:英国两家大型教学医院。参与者:来自非工作时间无线系统的任务级数据(n = 29,885个请求),由医务人员、护士和专职卫生专业人员使用。主要观察指标:护士要求完成任务的数量和类型、初级医生完成任务的时间。结果:在8月转换前后,护士要求的非工作时间任务数量总体上没有变化(前15次,后14次,p = 0.46)。然而,紧急任务的数量更大(p = 0.016),相当于每天多5个紧急任务。转换后,由于常规任务所需的时间减少,医生完成任务所需的时间更少(中位数为74分钟vs 66分钟;p = 3.9 × 10(-9))。结论:本研究提示“八月效应”并不是因为新入职的初级医生完成任务较慢或工作量较大。需要进一步的研究来调查看到的紧急任务数量增加的原因,但可能的因素是错误、遗漏和不合理的优先级。因此,改进培训和质量控制有可能解决这种未解决的患者风险持续时间增加的问题。该研究还强调了促进临床活动定量研究的新技术的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信