United States of America: health system review.

Q1 Medicine
Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Thomas Rice, Pauline Rosenau, Lynn Y Unruh, Andrew J Barnes, Richard B Saltman, Ewout van Ginneken
{"title":"United States of America: health system review.","authors":"Thomas Rice,&nbsp;Pauline Rosenau,&nbsp;Lynn Y Unruh,&nbsp;Andrew J Barnes,&nbsp;Richard B Saltman,&nbsp;Ewout van Ginneken","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This analysis of the United States health system reviews the developments in organization and governance, health financing, health-care provision, health reforms and health system performance. The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. It has a large and well-trained health workforce, a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, a robust health sector research program and, for selected services, among the best medical outcomes in the world. But it also suffers from incomplete coverage of its citizenry, health expenditure levels per person far exceeding all other countries, poor measures on many objective and subjective measures of quality and outcomes, an unequal distribution of resources and outcomes across the country and among different population groups, and lagging efforts to introduce health information technology. It is difficult to determine the extent to which deficiencies are health-system related, though it seems that at least some of the problems are a result of poor access to care. Because of the adoption of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the United States is facing a period of enormous potential change. Improving coverage is a central aim, envisaged through subsidies for the uninsured to purchase private insurance, expanded eligibility for Medicaid (in some states) and greater protection for insured persons. Furthermore, primary care and public health receive increased funding, and quality and expenditures are addressed through a range of measures. Whether the ACA will indeed be effective in addressing the challenges identified above can only be determined over time. </p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"15 3","pages":"1-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This analysis of the United States health system reviews the developments in organization and governance, health financing, health-care provision, health reforms and health system performance. The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. It has a large and well-trained health workforce, a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, a robust health sector research program and, for selected services, among the best medical outcomes in the world. But it also suffers from incomplete coverage of its citizenry, health expenditure levels per person far exceeding all other countries, poor measures on many objective and subjective measures of quality and outcomes, an unequal distribution of resources and outcomes across the country and among different population groups, and lagging efforts to introduce health information technology. It is difficult to determine the extent to which deficiencies are health-system related, though it seems that at least some of the problems are a result of poor access to care. Because of the adoption of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the United States is facing a period of enormous potential change. Improving coverage is a central aim, envisaged through subsidies for the uninsured to purchase private insurance, expanded eligibility for Medicaid (in some states) and greater protection for insured persons. Furthermore, primary care and public health receive increased funding, and quality and expenditures are addressed through a range of measures. Whether the ACA will indeed be effective in addressing the challenges identified above can only be determined over time.

美利坚合众国:卫生系统审查。
这份对美国卫生系统的分析回顾了组织和治理、卫生融资、卫生保健提供、卫生改革和卫生系统绩效方面的发展。美国的卫生系统既有相当大的优势,也有明显的弱点。它拥有一支庞大和训练有素的卫生工作队伍,众多高质量的医学专家以及二级和三级机构,一个强有力的卫生部门研究计划,并在某些服务方面拥有世界上最好的医疗成果。但它也面临着公民覆盖面不全、人均卫生支出水平远远超过其他所有国家、许多客观和主观的质量和结果衡量指标不佳、资源和结果在全国各地和不同人口群体之间分配不均以及引进卫生信息技术的努力滞后等问题。很难确定缺陷在多大程度上与卫生系统有关,尽管看起来至少有一些问题是难以获得保健的结果。由于2010年通过了《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act),美国正面临着一个潜在发生巨大变化的时期。扩大覆盖面是一个中心目标,设想通过为未参保者购买私人保险提供补贴,扩大医疗补助(在某些州)的资格,以及加强对参保人员的保护。此外,初级保健和公共卫生获得了更多的资金,并通过一系列措施解决了质量和支出问题。ACA是否真的能有效应对上述挑战,只能随着时间的推移才能确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信