Learning styles in vertically integrated teaching.

Kay Brumpton, Scott Kitchener, Linda Sweet
{"title":"Learning styles in vertically integrated teaching.","authors":"Kay Brumpton,&nbsp;Scott Kitchener,&nbsp;Linda Sweet","doi":"10.1111/tct.12024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With vertical integration, registrars and medical students attend the same educational workshops. It is not known whether these learners have similar or different learning styles related to their level of education within the medical training schema. This study aims to collect information about learning styles with a view to changing teaching strategies. If a significant difference is demonstrated this will impact on required approaches to teaching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The VARK learning inventory questionnaire was administered to 36 general practice registrars and 20 medical students. The learning styles were compared as individuals and then related to their level of education within the medical training schema.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students had a greater preference for multimodal learning compared with registrars (62.5 per cent versus 33.3 per cent, respectively). More than half of the registrars preferred uni or bimodal learning modalities, compared with one-third of the medical students.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present workshop format based on visual and aural material will not match the learning needs of most learners. This small study has shown that the majority of medical students and registrars could have their learning preferences better met by the addition of written material to the workshop series. Surprisingly, a significantly larger number of medical students than registrars appeared to be broadly multimodal in their learning style, and this warrants further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"10 5","pages":"282-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.12024","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: With vertical integration, registrars and medical students attend the same educational workshops. It is not known whether these learners have similar or different learning styles related to their level of education within the medical training schema. This study aims to collect information about learning styles with a view to changing teaching strategies. If a significant difference is demonstrated this will impact on required approaches to teaching.

Methods: The VARK learning inventory questionnaire was administered to 36 general practice registrars and 20 medical students. The learning styles were compared as individuals and then related to their level of education within the medical training schema.

Results: Students had a greater preference for multimodal learning compared with registrars (62.5 per cent versus 33.3 per cent, respectively). More than half of the registrars preferred uni or bimodal learning modalities, compared with one-third of the medical students.

Discussion: The present workshop format based on visual and aural material will not match the learning needs of most learners. This small study has shown that the majority of medical students and registrars could have their learning preferences better met by the addition of written material to the workshop series. Surprisingly, a significantly larger number of medical students than registrars appeared to be broadly multimodal in their learning style, and this warrants further research.

垂直整合教学中的学习方式。
背景:通过纵向整合,注册员和医科学生参加相同的教育讲习班。目前尚不清楚这些学习者在医学培训方案中与其教育水平相关的学习风格是否相似或不同。本研究旨在收集有关学习风格的资讯,以改变教学策略。如果表现出显著的差异,这将影响所需的教学方法。方法:采用VARK学习量表对36名全科注册医师和20名医学生进行问卷调查。学习风格以个体为单位进行比较,然后将其与医学培训图式内的教育水平相关联。结果:与注册者相比,学生更倾向于多模式学习(分别为62.5%和33.3%)。超过一半的注册者更喜欢单模或双模学习模式,相比之下,三分之一的医学生这样认为。讨论:目前基于视听材料的研讨会形式将不符合大多数学习者的学习需求。这项小型研究表明,在系列讲习班中增加书面材料可以更好地满足大多数医学生和注册者的学习偏好。令人惊讶的是,在学习方式上,医学生的数量明显多于注册者,这一点值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信