Primary healthcare practitioners' screening practices and attitudes towards women survivors of child abuse.

Mental health in family medicine Pub Date : 2012-09-01
Adeline Lee, Jan Coles, Stuart Lee, Jayashri Kulkarni
{"title":"Primary healthcare practitioners' screening practices and attitudes towards women survivors of child abuse.","authors":"Adeline Lee,&nbsp;Jan Coles,&nbsp;Stuart Lee,&nbsp;Jayashri Kulkarni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Child abuse survivors have an increased risk of developing various mental illnesses in adulthood, which may lead survivors to access primary healthcare services, in particular primary care mental health services. Aim To determine the frequency with which different primary care mental health practitioners encounter child abuse survivors in their practice and differences in their views about routine screening, level of importance, confidence and comfort in screening and supporting survivors, a cross-sectional study was conducted with 186 practitioners. Method The sample consisted of general practitioners (13.9%), psychologists (67.9%) and other professions such as psychiatrists, social workers, counsellors, psychotherapists, mental health nurses and other specific mental health practitioners (18.2%). Results Over 91% of practitioners reported that child abuse was a healthcare issue and was a problem for women in their practice. However, only 51.4% believed that women should be routinely screened for child abuse experiences. Significant differences among practitioner groups were found in aspects of screening and responding to survivors. General practitioners were significantly less likely to screen routinely and reported lower levels of confidence and comfort in conducting screening of survivors when compared with psychologists and other practitioners. The majority of practitioners saw it as psychologists' role to routinely screen; however, 57-82% of practitioners within each group reported that they would benefit from further training in areas relating to asking about and supporting survivors. Conclusion Findings highlighted further education as a potential area of need to enhance the knowledge and capacity of different practitioner groups in responding to women survivors of child abuse. </p>","PeriodicalId":89603,"journal":{"name":"Mental health in family medicine","volume":"9 3","pages":"181-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622910/pdf/MHFM-09-181.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health in family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Child abuse survivors have an increased risk of developing various mental illnesses in adulthood, which may lead survivors to access primary healthcare services, in particular primary care mental health services. Aim To determine the frequency with which different primary care mental health practitioners encounter child abuse survivors in their practice and differences in their views about routine screening, level of importance, confidence and comfort in screening and supporting survivors, a cross-sectional study was conducted with 186 practitioners. Method The sample consisted of general practitioners (13.9%), psychologists (67.9%) and other professions such as psychiatrists, social workers, counsellors, psychotherapists, mental health nurses and other specific mental health practitioners (18.2%). Results Over 91% of practitioners reported that child abuse was a healthcare issue and was a problem for women in their practice. However, only 51.4% believed that women should be routinely screened for child abuse experiences. Significant differences among practitioner groups were found in aspects of screening and responding to survivors. General practitioners were significantly less likely to screen routinely and reported lower levels of confidence and comfort in conducting screening of survivors when compared with psychologists and other practitioners. The majority of practitioners saw it as psychologists' role to routinely screen; however, 57-82% of practitioners within each group reported that they would benefit from further training in areas relating to asking about and supporting survivors. Conclusion Findings highlighted further education as a potential area of need to enhance the knowledge and capacity of different practitioner groups in responding to women survivors of child abuse.

初级保健从业人员对虐待儿童的妇女幸存者的筛查做法和态度。
背景虐待儿童幸存者成年后患各种精神疾病的风险更高,这可能导致幸存者寻求初级保健服务,特别是初级保健精神卫生服务。目的对186名初级保健精神卫生从业人员进行了一项横断面研究,以确定不同初级保健精神卫生从业人员在执业过程中遇到虐待儿童幸存者的频率,以及他们对常规筛查、筛查和支持幸存者的重要性、信心和舒适度的看法的差异。方法以全科医生(13.9%)、心理医生(67.9%)、精神科医生、社会工作者、心理咨询师、心理治疗师、心理卫生护士和其他专业心理卫生从业人员(18.2%)为调查对象。结果超过91%的从业人员报告说,虐待儿童是一个保健问题,是妇女在执业过程中的一个问题。然而,只有51.4%的人认为女性应该定期接受虐待儿童经历的筛查。在筛查和应对幸存者方面,从业者群体之间存在显著差异。与心理学家和其他从业者相比,全科医生进行常规筛查的可能性明显较低,并且在进行幸存者筛查时报告的信心和舒适度较低。大多数从业人员认为,常规筛查是心理学家的职责;然而,每组中57-82%的从业者报告说,他们将受益于与询问和支持幸存者有关的领域的进一步培训。结论调查结果强调,进一步教育是一个潜在的需要领域,以提高不同从业者群体在应对虐待儿童的妇女幸存者方面的知识和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书