[To become a "bioethicist"?].

Nouzha Guessous
{"title":"[To become a \"bioethicist\"?].","authors":"Nouzha Guessous","doi":"10.3917/jib.242.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To date, there is no consensus on the definition of bioethics. As a multidisciplinarv reflection by essence, it is not clear yet if it is a \"specialty\" or an approach. Bioethics teaching is not widespread and far from being standardized. Thus depending on the country and the institutions that provide it, there are still major variations in the background of the trainees, the terms, content and validation of the training provided, the qualifications for the teachers, and the professional status of the laureates. Although graduates in bioethics are more numerous, the title of \"bioethicist\" is still neither clearly defined, nor reserved for employment status. Within this framework the debate should furthermore reflect on the need or even the relevance to professionalize bioethics. Would it be appropriate and how to formalize bioethics multidisciplinary reflection and deliberation in a \"specialty\" with defined functions and jobs in the labor market? What could be the general field of qualification and areas of specialty? Can we design qualifications and status in bioethics like it has been done in law and legal sciences? Should we cope with \"general bioethicists\" versus \"specialized\" one? \"universalist bioethicists\" versus \"culturally oriented\" one? The debate is open.</p>","PeriodicalId":81629,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics","volume":"24 2-3","pages":"43-52, 164-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jib.242.0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, there is no consensus on the definition of bioethics. As a multidisciplinarv reflection by essence, it is not clear yet if it is a "specialty" or an approach. Bioethics teaching is not widespread and far from being standardized. Thus depending on the country and the institutions that provide it, there are still major variations in the background of the trainees, the terms, content and validation of the training provided, the qualifications for the teachers, and the professional status of the laureates. Although graduates in bioethics are more numerous, the title of "bioethicist" is still neither clearly defined, nor reserved for employment status. Within this framework the debate should furthermore reflect on the need or even the relevance to professionalize bioethics. Would it be appropriate and how to formalize bioethics multidisciplinary reflection and deliberation in a "specialty" with defined functions and jobs in the labor market? What could be the general field of qualification and areas of specialty? Can we design qualifications and status in bioethics like it has been done in law and legal sciences? Should we cope with "general bioethicists" versus "specialized" one? "universalist bioethicists" versus "culturally oriented" one? The debate is open.

[成为一个“生物伦理学家”?]
迄今为止,对生命伦理学的定义还没有达成共识。作为一种本质上的多学科反思,它究竟是一种“专业”还是一种方法尚不明确。生物伦理学教学不普及,远未规范。因此,根据提供培训的国家和机构的不同,受训者的背景、所提供培训的期限、内容和有效性、教师的资格以及获奖者的专业地位仍然存在重大差异。虽然生物伦理学专业的毕业生越来越多,但“生物伦理学家”的头衔仍然没有明确的定义,也没有保留到就业状态。在这个框架内,辩论应该进一步反映生物伦理学专业化的必要性甚至相关性。在劳动力市场上,将生物伦理学的多学科反思和审议形式化是合适的吗?如何将其形式化,成为一个具有明确功能和工作的“专业”?资格的一般领域和专业领域是什么?我们能否像在法律和法律科学中那样,在生命伦理学中设计资格和地位?我们应该应对“一般生物伦理学家”还是“专业”生物伦理学家?“普遍主义的生物伦理学家”还是“文化导向的”?辩论是公开的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书