Changes in water sorption and solubility of dental adhesive systems after cigarette smoke.

ISRN dentistry Pub Date : 2013-07-28 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/605847
Lívia Andrade Vitória, Thaiane Rodrigues Aguiar, Poliana Ramos Braga Santos, Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti, Paula Mathias
{"title":"Changes in water sorption and solubility of dental adhesive systems after cigarette smoke.","authors":"Lívia Andrade Vitória,&nbsp;Thaiane Rodrigues Aguiar,&nbsp;Poliana Ramos Braga Santos,&nbsp;Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti,&nbsp;Paula Mathias","doi":"10.1155/2013/605847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim. To evaluate the effect of cigarette smoke on water sorption and solubility of four adhesive systems. Materials and Methods. Sixteen disks of each adhesive system were prepared (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive (SA); Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive System (Adhesive + Primer) (SAP); Adper Single Bond Plus (SB); Adper Easy One (EO)). Specimens were desiccated until a constant mass was obtained and divided into two groups (n = 8). One-half of the specimens were immersed in deionized water, while the other half were also immersed, but with daily exposure to tobacco smoke. After 21 days, disks were measured again and stored in desiccators until constant mass was achieved. Data were calculated according to ISO specifications and statistically analyzed. Results. The tobacco smoke only significantly affected the water sorption and solubility of EO. There were significant differences in both analyses among materials tested. The SB exhibited the highest water sorption, followed by EO, which demonstrated significantly higher solubility values than SB. The SA and SAP showed low water sorption and solubility, and there were no significant differences between the two. Conclusion. Regardless of smoke exposure, both simplified adhesive systems presented an inferior performance that could be related to the complex mixture of components in such versions. </p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2013 ","pages":"605847"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/605847","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/605847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the effect of cigarette smoke on water sorption and solubility of four adhesive systems. Materials and Methods. Sixteen disks of each adhesive system were prepared (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive (SA); Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive System (Adhesive + Primer) (SAP); Adper Single Bond Plus (SB); Adper Easy One (EO)). Specimens were desiccated until a constant mass was obtained and divided into two groups (n = 8). One-half of the specimens were immersed in deionized water, while the other half were also immersed, but with daily exposure to tobacco smoke. After 21 days, disks were measured again and stored in desiccators until constant mass was achieved. Data were calculated according to ISO specifications and statistically analyzed. Results. The tobacco smoke only significantly affected the water sorption and solubility of EO. There were significant differences in both analyses among materials tested. The SB exhibited the highest water sorption, followed by EO, which demonstrated significantly higher solubility values than SB. The SA and SAP showed low water sorption and solubility, and there were no significant differences between the two. Conclusion. Regardless of smoke exposure, both simplified adhesive systems presented an inferior performance that could be related to the complex mixture of components in such versions.

吸烟后牙胶系统的吸水性和溶解度变化。
的目标。评价香烟烟雾对四种胶粘剂体系的吸水性和溶解度的影响。材料与方法。每一种胶粘剂体系各制备16个膜片(Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose adhesive, SA);Adper Scotchbond多用途粘合剂系统(粘合剂+底漆)(SAP);Adper单键+ (SB);Adper Easy One (EO)。将标本干燥至获得恒定质量,并分为两组(n = 8)。一半标本浸泡在去离子水中,另一半也浸泡在去离子水中,但每天暴露在烟草烟雾中。21天后,再次测量磁盘并存储在干燥器中,直到达到恒定质量。数据按ISO规范计算并进行统计分析。结果。烟草烟雾仅对EO的吸水性和溶解度有显著影响。两种分析结果在被测材料之间存在显著差异。SB的吸水率最高,其次是EO,其溶解度值显著高于SB, SA和SAP的吸水率和溶解度均较低,两者之间无显著差异。结论。不考虑烟雾暴露,两种简化的粘合剂系统都表现出较差的性能,这可能与这些版本中复杂的成分混合物有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信