Diagnosis of acromegaly: state of the art.

Expert opinion on medical diagnostics Pub Date : 2013-09-01 Epub Date: 2013-07-31 DOI:10.1517/17530059.2013.820181
Subramanian Kannan, Laurence Kennedy
{"title":"Diagnosis of acromegaly: state of the art.","authors":"Subramanian Kannan,&nbsp;Laurence Kennedy","doi":"10.1517/17530059.2013.820181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly relies on measurement of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH). An elevated IGF-1 level above the age- and gender-specific normal range and nonsuppression of GH to oral glucose load to a nadir < 0.4 ng/ml in sensitive assays are currently considered diagnostic of acromegaly. Lack of normative data for both IGF-1 and GH across a wide range of populations and ethnicities, interassay and intraassay laboratory variability, pulsatility of GH secretion, and effects of medications and hormones may confound interpretation of these biochemical tests.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Clinical situations in which acromegaly should be suspected and/or investigated. Strengths and limitations of current IGF-1/GH assays are discussed. Clinical scenarios with discordant GH suppression test and IGF-1 levels and, briefly, acromegaly in pregnancy, prolactin-cosecreting tumors, familial acromegaly, and nonpituitary acromegaly are also discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Serum IGF-1 is the cornerstone and in most cases the stand-alone test in the diagnosis and follow-up in patients with acromegaly. Diagnosis depends on the accurate and reliable measurement of serum IGF-1. GH suppression testing is currently used in limited clinical setting. Standardization of IGF-1 assay and development of normative data across a wide population base are needed. Newer bioassays for IGF-1 hold promise for future.</p>","PeriodicalId":72996,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","volume":"7 5","pages":"443-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2013.820181","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2013.820181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: Biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly relies on measurement of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH). An elevated IGF-1 level above the age- and gender-specific normal range and nonsuppression of GH to oral glucose load to a nadir < 0.4 ng/ml in sensitive assays are currently considered diagnostic of acromegaly. Lack of normative data for both IGF-1 and GH across a wide range of populations and ethnicities, interassay and intraassay laboratory variability, pulsatility of GH secretion, and effects of medications and hormones may confound interpretation of these biochemical tests.

Areas covered: Clinical situations in which acromegaly should be suspected and/or investigated. Strengths and limitations of current IGF-1/GH assays are discussed. Clinical scenarios with discordant GH suppression test and IGF-1 levels and, briefly, acromegaly in pregnancy, prolactin-cosecreting tumors, familial acromegaly, and nonpituitary acromegaly are also discussed.

Expert opinion: Serum IGF-1 is the cornerstone and in most cases the stand-alone test in the diagnosis and follow-up in patients with acromegaly. Diagnosis depends on the accurate and reliable measurement of serum IGF-1. GH suppression testing is currently used in limited clinical setting. Standardization of IGF-1 assay and development of normative data across a wide population base are needed. Newer bioassays for IGF-1 hold promise for future.

肢端肥大症的诊断:最新进展。
肢端肥大症的生化诊断依赖于胰岛素样生长因子-1 (IGF-1)和生长激素(GH)的检测。如果IGF-1水平高于年龄和性别的正常范围,并且在敏感试验中GH对口服葡萄糖负荷的抑制不低于0.4 ng/ml,目前被认为是肢端肥大症的诊断。缺乏IGF-1和生长激素在大范围人群和种族中的规范性数据、测定间和测定内实验室变异性、生长激素分泌的脉动性以及药物和激素的影响,可能会混淆对这些生化测试的解释。涉及领域:应怀疑肢端肥大症和/或调查肢端肥大症的临床情况。讨论了当前IGF-1/GH测定法的优势和局限性。本文还讨论了生长激素抑制试验和IGF-1水平不一致的临床情况,以及妊娠肢端肥大症、催乳素共分泌肿瘤、家族性肢端肥大症和非垂体性肢端肥大症。专家意见:血清IGF-1是肢端肥大症患者诊断和随访的基础,在大多数情况下是独立的检测。诊断依赖于准确可靠的血清IGF-1测定。生长激素抑制试验目前在有限的临床环境中使用。需要在广泛的人群基础上标准化IGF-1检测和发展规范数据。新的IGF-1生物检测方法在未来有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信