{"title":"Diagnosis of acromegaly: state of the art.","authors":"Subramanian Kannan, Laurence Kennedy","doi":"10.1517/17530059.2013.820181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly relies on measurement of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH). An elevated IGF-1 level above the age- and gender-specific normal range and nonsuppression of GH to oral glucose load to a nadir < 0.4 ng/ml in sensitive assays are currently considered diagnostic of acromegaly. Lack of normative data for both IGF-1 and GH across a wide range of populations and ethnicities, interassay and intraassay laboratory variability, pulsatility of GH secretion, and effects of medications and hormones may confound interpretation of these biochemical tests.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Clinical situations in which acromegaly should be suspected and/or investigated. Strengths and limitations of current IGF-1/GH assays are discussed. Clinical scenarios with discordant GH suppression test and IGF-1 levels and, briefly, acromegaly in pregnancy, prolactin-cosecreting tumors, familial acromegaly, and nonpituitary acromegaly are also discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Serum IGF-1 is the cornerstone and in most cases the stand-alone test in the diagnosis and follow-up in patients with acromegaly. Diagnosis depends on the accurate and reliable measurement of serum IGF-1. GH suppression testing is currently used in limited clinical setting. Standardization of IGF-1 assay and development of normative data across a wide population base are needed. Newer bioassays for IGF-1 hold promise for future.</p>","PeriodicalId":72996,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","volume":"7 5","pages":"443-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2013.820181","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2013.820181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Introduction: Biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly relies on measurement of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH). An elevated IGF-1 level above the age- and gender-specific normal range and nonsuppression of GH to oral glucose load to a nadir < 0.4 ng/ml in sensitive assays are currently considered diagnostic of acromegaly. Lack of normative data for both IGF-1 and GH across a wide range of populations and ethnicities, interassay and intraassay laboratory variability, pulsatility of GH secretion, and effects of medications and hormones may confound interpretation of these biochemical tests.
Areas covered: Clinical situations in which acromegaly should be suspected and/or investigated. Strengths and limitations of current IGF-1/GH assays are discussed. Clinical scenarios with discordant GH suppression test and IGF-1 levels and, briefly, acromegaly in pregnancy, prolactin-cosecreting tumors, familial acromegaly, and nonpituitary acromegaly are also discussed.
Expert opinion: Serum IGF-1 is the cornerstone and in most cases the stand-alone test in the diagnosis and follow-up in patients with acromegaly. Diagnosis depends on the accurate and reliable measurement of serum IGF-1. GH suppression testing is currently used in limited clinical setting. Standardization of IGF-1 assay and development of normative data across a wide population base are needed. Newer bioassays for IGF-1 hold promise for future.