Historical perspective on agroterrorism: lessons learned from 1945 to 2012.

Haralampos Keremidis, Bernd Appel, Andrea Menrath, Katharina Tomuzia, Magnus Normark, Roger Roffey, Rickard Knutsson
{"title":"Historical perspective on agroterrorism: lessons learned from 1945 to 2012.","authors":"Haralampos Keremidis,&nbsp;Bernd Appel,&nbsp;Andrea Menrath,&nbsp;Katharina Tomuzia,&nbsp;Magnus Normark,&nbsp;Roger Roffey,&nbsp;Rickard Knutsson","doi":"10.1089/bsp.2012.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents a historical perspective on agroterrorism cases from 1945 until 2012. The threat groups and perpetrators associated with bio- and agroterrorism are clustered into several groups: apocalyptic sects, lone wolves, political groups, and religious groups. We used open-source information, and 4 biological agroterrorism cases are described: (1) in 1952, Mau Mau poisoned cattle in Kenya by using a plant toxin from the African milk bush plant; (2) in 1985, the USDA claimed that Mexican contract workers were involved in deliberately spreading screwworm (Cochliomyia hominivorax) among livestock; (3) in 2000, Palestinian media reported that Israeli settlers released sewer water into Palestinian agricultural fields; and (4) in 2011, a person was sentenced to prison after threatening US and UK livestock with the deliberate spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus. All 4 cases can be assigned to political groups. These cases have not attracted much attention in literature nor in the public media, and the credibility of the sources of information varies. We concluded that agroterrorism has not been a problem during the period studied. Lessons learned from the few cases have generated awareness about the fact that nontypical biological weapons and non-high-risk agents, such as African milk bush, screwworm, and sewer water, have been used by attackers to influence local decision makers. This review will be useful in improving future preparedness planning and developing countermeasures. </p>","PeriodicalId":87059,"journal":{"name":"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science","volume":"11 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/bsp.2012.0080","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2012.0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This article presents a historical perspective on agroterrorism cases from 1945 until 2012. The threat groups and perpetrators associated with bio- and agroterrorism are clustered into several groups: apocalyptic sects, lone wolves, political groups, and religious groups. We used open-source information, and 4 biological agroterrorism cases are described: (1) in 1952, Mau Mau poisoned cattle in Kenya by using a plant toxin from the African milk bush plant; (2) in 1985, the USDA claimed that Mexican contract workers were involved in deliberately spreading screwworm (Cochliomyia hominivorax) among livestock; (3) in 2000, Palestinian media reported that Israeli settlers released sewer water into Palestinian agricultural fields; and (4) in 2011, a person was sentenced to prison after threatening US and UK livestock with the deliberate spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus. All 4 cases can be assigned to political groups. These cases have not attracted much attention in literature nor in the public media, and the credibility of the sources of information varies. We concluded that agroterrorism has not been a problem during the period studied. Lessons learned from the few cases have generated awareness about the fact that nontypical biological weapons and non-high-risk agents, such as African milk bush, screwworm, and sewer water, have been used by attackers to influence local decision makers. This review will be useful in improving future preparedness planning and developing countermeasures.

农业恐怖主义的历史视角:1945年至2012年的经验教训。
本文从历史角度对1945年至2012年的农业恐怖主义案件进行了分析。与生物和农业恐怖主义有关的威胁团体和肇事者分为几个群体:末日教派、孤狼、政治团体和宗教团体。我们使用开源信息,描述了4个生物农业恐怖主义案例:(1)1952年,茅茅在肯尼亚用一种来自非洲乳灌木植物的植物毒素毒死了牛;(2) 1985年,美国农业部声称墨西哥的合同工人参与了故意在牲畜中传播螺旋虫(人锥虫);(3) 2000年,巴勒斯坦媒体报道,以色列定居者将污水排放到巴勒斯坦农田;(4) 2011年,一名男子因故意传播口蹄疫病毒威胁美国和英国的牲畜而被判入狱。所有4个案件都可以分配给政治团体。这些案例在文献和公共媒体上都没有引起太多关注,信息来源的可信度也各不相同。我们的结论是,在研究期间,农业恐怖主义并不是一个问题。从少数案件中吸取的教训使人们认识到,攻击者利用非典型生物武器和非高风险药剂,如非洲乳灌木、螺旋蝇和污水,来影响当地决策者。这一审查将有助于改进未来的防备规划和制定对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信