{"title":"A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers.","authors":"Maki Bunno, Kyosuke Gouda, Kunihiro Yamahara, Masanori Kawaguchi","doi":"10.4137/JCM.S11320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for treating gastric tumors. Several trials have shown the efficacy of 4 or 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration for post-ESD ulcers. However, if the size of the post-ESD ulcer is larger than predicted, PPI administration alone might not be sufficient for the ulcer to heal within 4 weeks. There is no report about the efficacy of post-ESD gastric ulcers by esomeprazole. We examined retrospectively the efficacy of a combination therapy of esomeprazole plus rebamipide, a mucosal-protective antiulcer drug, on the acceleration of post-ESD ulcer healing comparing with omeprazole plus rebamipide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia. We conducted a case-control study to compare the healing rates within 4 weeks effected by esomeprazole plus rebamipide (group E) and omeprazole plus rebamipide (group O). The sizes of the artificial ulcers were divided into normal-sized or large-sized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except age and sex. Stage S1 disease was observed in 27.6% and 38.7% of patients after 4 weeks of treatment in the group E and O, respectively. In large-sized artificial ulcers, the healing rate of stage S1 in group E is significantly higher than that in group O in 4 weeks.(25% VS 0%:P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety and efficacy profiles of esomeprazole plus rebamipide and omeprazole and rebamipide are similar for the treatment of ESD-induced ulcers. In large-sized ulcers, esomeprazole plus rebamipide promotes ulcer healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":89792,"journal":{"name":"Japanese clinical medicine","volume":"4 ","pages":"7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/JCM.S11320","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese clinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/JCM.S11320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for treating gastric tumors. Several trials have shown the efficacy of 4 or 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration for post-ESD ulcers. However, if the size of the post-ESD ulcer is larger than predicted, PPI administration alone might not be sufficient for the ulcer to heal within 4 weeks. There is no report about the efficacy of post-ESD gastric ulcers by esomeprazole. We examined retrospectively the efficacy of a combination therapy of esomeprazole plus rebamipide, a mucosal-protective antiulcer drug, on the acceleration of post-ESD ulcer healing comparing with omeprazole plus rebamipide.
Methods: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia. We conducted a case-control study to compare the healing rates within 4 weeks effected by esomeprazole plus rebamipide (group E) and omeprazole plus rebamipide (group O). The sizes of the artificial ulcers were divided into normal-sized or large-sized.
Results: The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except age and sex. Stage S1 disease was observed in 27.6% and 38.7% of patients after 4 weeks of treatment in the group E and O, respectively. In large-sized artificial ulcers, the healing rate of stage S1 in group E is significantly higher than that in group O in 4 weeks.(25% VS 0%:P = 0.02).
Conclusions: The safety and efficacy profiles of esomeprazole plus rebamipide and omeprazole and rebamipide are similar for the treatment of ESD-induced ulcers. In large-sized ulcers, esomeprazole plus rebamipide promotes ulcer healing.
目的:内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)在治疗胃肿瘤中的应用价值。几项试验显示4或8周质子泵抑制剂(PPI)对esd后溃疡的疗效。然而,如果esd后溃疡的大小大于预期,仅使用PPI可能不足以使溃疡在4周内愈合。埃索美拉唑治疗esd后胃溃疡的疗效尚未见报道。我们回顾性研究了埃索美拉唑加抗粘膜保护药物利巴米胺联合治疗与奥美拉唑加利巴米胺比较,在加速esd后溃疡愈合方面的疗效。方法:回顾我院胃肿瘤患者行ESD治疗的病历。我们采用病例对照研究,比较埃索美拉唑联合雷巴米胺组(E组)和奥美拉唑联合雷巴米胺组(O组)4周内的愈合情况。人工溃疡的大小分为正常大小和大大小。结果:除年龄和性别外,两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。治疗4周后,E组和O组分别有27.6%和38.7%的患者出现S1期疾病。在大面积人工溃疡中,4周内E组S1期的愈合率明显高于O组。(25% vs 0%: p = 0.02)。结论:埃索美拉唑联合利巴米胺与奥美拉唑联合利巴米胺治疗静电致溃疡的安全性和有效性相似。对于大面积溃疡,埃索美拉唑加利巴米胺可促进溃疡愈合。