Implementation Interventions Used in Nursing Homes and Hospitals: A Descriptive, Comparative Study between Austria, Germany, and The Netherlands.

ISRN nursing Pub Date : 2013-07-14 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/706054
Helga E Breimaier, Ruud J G Halfens, Doris Wilborn, Esther Meesterberends, Gunnar Haase Nielsen, Christa Lohrmann
{"title":"Implementation Interventions Used in Nursing Homes and Hospitals: A Descriptive, Comparative Study between Austria, Germany, and The Netherlands.","authors":"Helga E Breimaier,&nbsp;Ruud J G Halfens,&nbsp;Doris Wilborn,&nbsp;Esther Meesterberends,&nbsp;Gunnar Haase Nielsen,&nbsp;Christa Lohrmann","doi":"10.1155/2013/706054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Translating guidelines into nursing practice remains a considerable challenge. Until now, little attention has been paid to which interventions are used in practice to implement guidelines on changing clinical nursing practice. This cross-sectional study determined the current ranges and rates of implementation-related interventions in Austria, Germany, and The Netherlands and explored possible differences between these countries. An online questionnaire based on the conceptual framework of implementation interventions (professional, organizational, financial, and regulatory) from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) data collection checklist was used to gather data from nursing homes and hospitals. Provision of written materials is the most frequently used professional implementation intervention (85%), whereas changes in the patient record system rank foremost among organisational interventions (78%). Financial incentives for nurses are rarely used. More interventions were used in Austria and Germany than in The Netherlands (20.3/20.2/17.3). Professional interventions are used more frequently in Germany and financial interventions more frequently in The Netherlands. Implementation efforts focus mainly on professional and organisational interventions. Nurse managers and other responsible personnel should direct their focus to a broader array of implementation interventions using the four different categories of EPOC's conceptual framework. </p>","PeriodicalId":89398,"journal":{"name":"ISRN nursing","volume":"2013 ","pages":"706054"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/706054","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/706054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Translating guidelines into nursing practice remains a considerable challenge. Until now, little attention has been paid to which interventions are used in practice to implement guidelines on changing clinical nursing practice. This cross-sectional study determined the current ranges and rates of implementation-related interventions in Austria, Germany, and The Netherlands and explored possible differences between these countries. An online questionnaire based on the conceptual framework of implementation interventions (professional, organizational, financial, and regulatory) from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) data collection checklist was used to gather data from nursing homes and hospitals. Provision of written materials is the most frequently used professional implementation intervention (85%), whereas changes in the patient record system rank foremost among organisational interventions (78%). Financial incentives for nurses are rarely used. More interventions were used in Austria and Germany than in The Netherlands (20.3/20.2/17.3). Professional interventions are used more frequently in Germany and financial interventions more frequently in The Netherlands. Implementation efforts focus mainly on professional and organisational interventions. Nurse managers and other responsible personnel should direct their focus to a broader array of implementation interventions using the four different categories of EPOC's conceptual framework.

疗养院和医院实施干预措施:奥地利、德国和荷兰的描述性比较研究。
将指南转化为护理实践仍然是一个相当大的挑战。到目前为止,很少有人关注在实践中使用哪些干预措施来实施改变临床护理实践的指导方针。这项横断面研究确定了奥地利、德国和荷兰目前实施相关干预措施的范围和比率,并探讨了这些国家之间可能存在的差异。一份基于Cochrane有效实践和护理组织(EPOC)数据收集清单中实施干预措施(专业、组织、财务和监管)概念框架的在线问卷用于收集养老院和医院的数据。提供书面材料是最常用的专业实施干预措施(85%),而患者记录系统的变化在组织干预措施中排名第一(78%)。对护士的经济奖励很少使用。奥地利和德国使用的干预措施比荷兰多(20.3/20.2/17.3)。德国使用专业干预措施的频率更高,荷兰使用金融干预措施的频度更高。执行工作主要侧重于专业和组织干预。护士管理人员和其他负责人员应使用EPOC概念框架的四个不同类别,将重点放在更广泛的实施干预措施上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书