Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population.

ISRN oncology Pub Date : 2013-06-25 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/463594
M Galukande, H Wabinga, F Mirembe, C Karamagi, A Asea
{"title":"Difference in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer by ER Status in an Indigenous African Population.","authors":"M Galukande, H Wabinga, F Mirembe, C Karamagi, A Asea","doi":"10.1155/2013/463594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women globally. In Uganda, it is on the rise, projected at a 4.5% annual ASR increase (age standardized incidence rate). The reasons for this steep increase are not fully established. In the recent past, gene profiling in tumor tissues suggests that breast cancers are divided into subtypes dependent on the presence or absence of oestrogen receptor, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2). These subtypes do have distinctive clinical outcomes and perhaps risk factors from past studies. There is paucity of data on hormonal receptor status and the traditionally known risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study therefore was to establish the differences between ER status and the traditionally known risk factors for breast cancer in Uganda. Methods. An observational analytical hospital, based study, carried out at Makerere University, College of Health Sciences. Formalin fixed and paraffin imbedded sections were prepared for haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Ethical approval was obtained. Results. A total of 113 women were recruited. Mean age was 45 years (SD14). There were no significant differences in selected risk factors (setting, age, contraceptive use, parity, breast feeding, or menarche) by ER status although ER negative tumors had significantly higher grade tumors (by a factor of two) compared to ER positive tumors. Conclusion. There were no significant differences among risk factors by ER status contrary to what several other studies suggest. The manifestation of breast cancer in Africa warrants further extensive inquiry. </p>","PeriodicalId":89399,"journal":{"name":"ISRN oncology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"463594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/463594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women globally. In Uganda, it is on the rise, projected at a 4.5% annual ASR increase (age standardized incidence rate). The reasons for this steep increase are not fully established. In the recent past, gene profiling in tumor tissues suggests that breast cancers are divided into subtypes dependent on the presence or absence of oestrogen receptor, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2). These subtypes do have distinctive clinical outcomes and perhaps risk factors from past studies. There is paucity of data on hormonal receptor status and the traditionally known risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study therefore was to establish the differences between ER status and the traditionally known risk factors for breast cancer in Uganda. Methods. An observational analytical hospital, based study, carried out at Makerere University, College of Health Sciences. Formalin fixed and paraffin imbedded sections were prepared for haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Ethical approval was obtained. Results. A total of 113 women were recruited. Mean age was 45 years (SD14). There were no significant differences in selected risk factors (setting, age, contraceptive use, parity, breast feeding, or menarche) by ER status although ER negative tumors had significantly higher grade tumors (by a factor of two) compared to ER positive tumors. Conclusion. There were no significant differences among risk factors by ER status contrary to what several other studies suggest. The manifestation of breast cancer in Africa warrants further extensive inquiry.

非洲原住民乳腺癌风险因素在ER状态下的差异。
导言乳腺癌是全球妇女最常见的癌症。在乌干达,乳腺癌的发病率呈上升趋势,预计每年将增加 4.5%(年龄标准化发病率)。这种急剧增长的原因尚未完全确定。最近,肿瘤组织中的基因分析表明,乳腺癌可根据雌激素受体、孕激素和人类表皮生长因子受体 2(HER 2)的存在与否分为不同的亚型。从过去的研究来看,这些亚型确实有不同的临床结果,或许也有不同的风险因素。在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,有关激素受体状态和传统上已知的风险因素的数据很少。因此,本研究的目的是在乌干达确定 ER 状态与传统上已知的乳腺癌风险因素之间的差异。研究方法在马凯雷雷大学健康科学学院开展了一项基于医院的观察分析研究。研究人员制备了福尔马林固定和石蜡包埋切片,用于血栓素和伊红(H&E)染色和免疫组化(IHC)。已获得伦理批准。结果共招募了 113 名妇女。平均年龄为 45 岁(SD14)。与ER阳性肿瘤相比,ER阴性肿瘤的分级明显更高(高出2倍),但ER状态与所选风险因素(环境、年龄、避孕药具使用情况、奇偶数、哺乳期或月经初潮)无明显差异。结论与其他几项研究表明的情况相反,ER状态的风险因素之间没有明显差异。非洲乳腺癌的表现值得进一步广泛研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信