Lithuania: health system review.

Q1 Medicine
Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Liubove Murauskiene, Raimonda Janoniene, Marija Veniute, Ewout van Ginneken, Marina Karanikolos
{"title":"Lithuania: health system review.","authors":"Liubove Murauskiene,&nbsp;Raimonda Janoniene,&nbsp;Marija Veniute,&nbsp;Ewout van Ginneken,&nbsp;Marina Karanikolos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This analysis of the Lithuanian health system reviews the developments in organization and governance, health financing, health-care provision, health reforms and health system performance since 2000.The Lithuanian health system is a mixed system, predominantly funded from the National Health Insurance Fund through a compulsory health insurance scheme, supplemented by substantial state contributions on behalf of the economically inactive population amounting to about half of its budget. Public financing of the health sector has gradually increased since 2004 to 5.2 per cent of GDP in 2010.Although the Lithuanian health system was tested by the recent economic crisis, Lithuanias counter-cyclical state health insurance contribution policies (ensuring coverage for the economically inactive population) helped the health system to weather the crisis, and Lithuania successfully used the crisis as a lever to reduce the prices of medicines.Yet the future impact of cuts in public health spending is a cause for concern. In addition, out-of-pocket payments remain high (in particular for pharmaceuticals) and could threaten health access for vulnerable groups.A number of challenges remain. The primary care system needs strengthening so that more patients are treated instead of being referred to a specialist, which will also require a change in attitude by patients. Transparency and accountability need to be increased in resource allocation, including financing of capital investment and in the payer provider relationship. Finally, population health,albeit improving, remains a concern, and major progress can be achieved by reducing the burden of amenable and preventable mortality. </p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"15 2","pages":"1-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This analysis of the Lithuanian health system reviews the developments in organization and governance, health financing, health-care provision, health reforms and health system performance since 2000.The Lithuanian health system is a mixed system, predominantly funded from the National Health Insurance Fund through a compulsory health insurance scheme, supplemented by substantial state contributions on behalf of the economically inactive population amounting to about half of its budget. Public financing of the health sector has gradually increased since 2004 to 5.2 per cent of GDP in 2010.Although the Lithuanian health system was tested by the recent economic crisis, Lithuanias counter-cyclical state health insurance contribution policies (ensuring coverage for the economically inactive population) helped the health system to weather the crisis, and Lithuania successfully used the crisis as a lever to reduce the prices of medicines.Yet the future impact of cuts in public health spending is a cause for concern. In addition, out-of-pocket payments remain high (in particular for pharmaceuticals) and could threaten health access for vulnerable groups.A number of challenges remain. The primary care system needs strengthening so that more patients are treated instead of being referred to a specialist, which will also require a change in attitude by patients. Transparency and accountability need to be increased in resource allocation, including financing of capital investment and in the payer provider relationship. Finally, population health,albeit improving, remains a concern, and major progress can be achieved by reducing the burden of amenable and preventable mortality.

立陶宛:卫生系统审查。
这份对立陶宛卫生系统的分析回顾了自2000年以来在组织和治理、卫生筹资、卫生保健提供、卫生改革和卫生系统绩效方面的发展。立陶宛的卫生系统是一个混合系统,主要由国家健康保险基金通过强制性健康保险计划提供资金,并由国家为非经济活动人口提供的大量捐款补充,约占其预算的一半。卫生部门的公共资金自2004年以来逐步增加,2010年占国内生产总值的5.2%。尽管立陶宛的卫生系统受到了最近经济危机的考验,但立陶宛的反周期国家健康保险缴费政策(确保不从事经济活动的人口得到覆盖)帮助卫生系统度过了危机,立陶宛成功地利用危机作为杠杆降低了药品价格。然而,公共卫生支出削减的未来影响令人担忧。此外,自付费用仍然很高(特别是药品费用),可能威胁到弱势群体获得保健服务的机会。许多挑战依然存在。初级保健系统需要加强,以便更多的病人得到治疗,而不是转诊给专科医生,这也需要病人改变态度。需要增加资源分配的透明度和问责制,包括资本投资的融资和付款人与提供者的关系。最后,人口健康虽然有所改善,但仍然令人关切,通过减少可控制和可预防的死亡率负担,可以取得重大进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信