G Godet, A Couaud, A Lucas, A Cardon, H Beloeil, C Ecoffey
{"title":"Cerebral oxygen saturation is improved by xenon anaesthesia during carotid clamping.","authors":"G Godet, A Couaud, A Lucas, A Cardon, H Beloeil, C Ecoffey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cerebral protective effect of xenon anesthesia could be of interest during carotid surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of xenon on cerebral oxygen saturation with those of propofol during carotid clamping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After approval of Research Ethics Board and patient informed consent, 74 patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy were enrolled. Patients were not randomized but were well matched by preoperative characteristics. Patients in the Xenon group were the ones scheduled for surgery in the operative theater equipped with the xenon anesthesia system. Anesthesia was started with a target control infusion of propofol and remifentanil. Patients were then divided into the control group (37 patients) with anesthesia maintained with target control infusion propofol and remifentanil and the Xenon group with anesthesia maintained with xenon (target inspired concentration of 60%) and target control infusion remifentanil. Remifentanil and xenon or propofol were stopped at the end of skin closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cerebral oxygen saturation decrease below 55% was less frequently observed in the Xenon group during carotid cross-clamping (7/37 patients vs 15/37; p=0.01). Compared with values observed before clamping, the decrease in cerebral oxygen saturation during clamping was significantly less important in the Xenon group (12±11% vs 17±14%, p=0.04). Blood pressure and heart rate were not different between groups during carotid clamping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study suggests that xenon anesthesia may be associated to higher cerebral oxygen saturation values when compared to propofol anesthesia during cross-clamping for carotid endarterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":89769,"journal":{"name":"HSR proceedings in intensive care & cardiovascular anesthesia","volume":"5 2","pages":"110-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/d3/hsrp-05-110.PMC3722342.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSR proceedings in intensive care & cardiovascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The cerebral protective effect of xenon anesthesia could be of interest during carotid surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of xenon on cerebral oxygen saturation with those of propofol during carotid clamping.
Methods: After approval of Research Ethics Board and patient informed consent, 74 patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy were enrolled. Patients were not randomized but were well matched by preoperative characteristics. Patients in the Xenon group were the ones scheduled for surgery in the operative theater equipped with the xenon anesthesia system. Anesthesia was started with a target control infusion of propofol and remifentanil. Patients were then divided into the control group (37 patients) with anesthesia maintained with target control infusion propofol and remifentanil and the Xenon group with anesthesia maintained with xenon (target inspired concentration of 60%) and target control infusion remifentanil. Remifentanil and xenon or propofol were stopped at the end of skin closure.
Results: A cerebral oxygen saturation decrease below 55% was less frequently observed in the Xenon group during carotid cross-clamping (7/37 patients vs 15/37; p=0.01). Compared with values observed before clamping, the decrease in cerebral oxygen saturation during clamping was significantly less important in the Xenon group (12±11% vs 17±14%, p=0.04). Blood pressure and heart rate were not different between groups during carotid clamping.
Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that xenon anesthesia may be associated to higher cerebral oxygen saturation values when compared to propofol anesthesia during cross-clamping for carotid endarterectomy.
简介:氙气麻醉对颈动脉手术的脑保护作用值得关注。本研究的目的是比较在颈动脉夹持期间氙气与异丙酚对脑氧饱和度的影响。方法:经研究伦理委员会批准和患者知情同意后,纳入74例计划行颈动脉内膜切除术的患者。患者不是随机的,但术前特征匹配良好。氙气组为在配备了氙气麻醉系统的手术室进行手术的患者。麻醉开始于靶控输注异丙酚和瑞芬太尼。然后将患者分为对照组(37例)和氙气组(目标激励浓度为60%)和靶控输注瑞芬太尼维持麻醉。皮肤闭合结束时停用瑞芬太尼和氙气或异丙酚。结果:氙气组颈动脉交叉夹持期间脑氧饱和度低于55%的发生率较低(7/37 vs 15/37;p = 0.01)。与夹持前相比,氙气组在夹持期间脑氧饱和度降低的重要性明显降低(12±11% vs 17±14%,p=0.04)。在颈动脉夹紧期间,两组间血压和心率无差异。结论:这项初步研究表明,与异丙酚麻醉相比,在颈动脉内膜切除术交叉夹持术中,氙气麻醉可能与更高的脑氧饱和度值有关。