Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a pragmatic observational study.
P Grassi, L Lo Nigro, K Battaglia, M Barone, F Testa, G Berlot
{"title":"Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a pragmatic observational study.","authors":"P Grassi, L Lo Nigro, K Battaglia, M Barone, F Testa, G Berlot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients passively adapted to the ventilator. Its usefulness in actively breathing ventilated patients was examined only by few studies with potential methodological shortcomings. This study sought to describe the performance of pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in hypotensive critically ill patients who trigger the ventilator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied forty two hypotensive, mechanically ventilated patients with documented spontaneous breathing activity in whom a fluid challenge was deemed necessary by the attending physician. All patients were ventilated with a Maquet Servo-i Ventilator in different ventilatory modes with a flow-regulated inspiratory trigger set on position 4. Pulse pressure variation, mean and systolic arterial pressure were observed before and after the fluid challenge, which consisted in the intravenous administration of a 250 ml bolus of 6% hetastarch. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a more than 15% increase in arterial pressure after volume expansion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for pulse pressure variation was 0.87 (95% CI 0.74 -0.99; p<0.0001) and the grey zone limits were 10% and 15%. Pulse pressure variation was correlated with increase in systolic arterial pressure (r2=0.32; p<0.001) and mean arterial pressure (r2=0.10; p=0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in patients who actively interact with a Servo-i ventilator with a flow-regulated inspiratory trigger set on position 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":89769,"journal":{"name":"HSR proceedings in intensive care & cardiovascular anesthesia","volume":"5 2","pages":"98-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/e2/hsrp-05-098.PMC3722341.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSR proceedings in intensive care & cardiovascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients passively adapted to the ventilator. Its usefulness in actively breathing ventilated patients was examined only by few studies with potential methodological shortcomings. This study sought to describe the performance of pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in hypotensive critically ill patients who trigger the ventilator.
Methods: We studied forty two hypotensive, mechanically ventilated patients with documented spontaneous breathing activity in whom a fluid challenge was deemed necessary by the attending physician. All patients were ventilated with a Maquet Servo-i Ventilator in different ventilatory modes with a flow-regulated inspiratory trigger set on position 4. Pulse pressure variation, mean and systolic arterial pressure were observed before and after the fluid challenge, which consisted in the intravenous administration of a 250 ml bolus of 6% hetastarch. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a more than 15% increase in arterial pressure after volume expansion.
Results: The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for pulse pressure variation was 0.87 (95% CI 0.74 -0.99; p<0.0001) and the grey zone limits were 10% and 15%. Pulse pressure variation was correlated with increase in systolic arterial pressure (r2=0.32; p<0.001) and mean arterial pressure (r2=0.10; p=0.037).
Conclusions: Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in patients who actively interact with a Servo-i ventilator with a flow-regulated inspiratory trigger set on position 4.
简介:脉搏压力变化预测被动适应呼吸机的机械通气患者的液体反应性。它在主动呼吸通气患者中的有用性仅被少数具有潜在方法学缺陷的研究所检验。本研究试图描述作为低血压危重患者触发呼吸机的液体反应性预测指标的脉压变化。方法:我们研究了42例低血压,机械通气的患者,记录有自主呼吸活动,主治医生认为有必要给予液体刺激。所有患者在不同的通气模式下使用Maquet Servo-i呼吸机进行通气,并将流量调节吸气触发器设置在4号位置。在静脉给药250 ml 6%的膨压剂前后,观察脉压变化、平均动脉压和收缩压。液体反应性定义为体积扩张后动脉压升高15%以上。结果:脉压变化受体操作者特征曲线下面积为0.87 (95% CI 0.74 ~ 0.99;结论:脉搏压力变化预测了主动使用伺服i呼吸机并将流量调节吸气触发器设置在4位的患者的液体反应性。