[Epidemiology of pressure ulcers: interpreting data epidemiological as an indicator of quality].

Servir (Lisbon, Portugal) Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Paulo Alves, Filomena Mota, P Ramos, Lúcia Vales
{"title":"[Epidemiology of pressure ulcers: interpreting data epidemiological as an indicator of quality].","authors":"Paulo Alves,&nbsp;Filomena Mota,&nbsp;P Ramos,&nbsp;Lúcia Vales","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of pressure ulcers (PU) is still a current problem in our society and a constant challenge for all professionals and health institutions. Health professionals worry increasingly about the safety of their patients in the hospital environment. However, pressure ulcers continue to be one of the most common types of injuries acquired during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to compare the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in community settings and care differentiated and interpret these values as indicators of quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of literture reporting incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcer as an outcome measure and is relation with quality indicators. Electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and EBSCO) were searched from 1 January 1999 to 31 Dezembro 2012 in the English, Spanish and Portuguese language. The MESH descriptors data were Pressure ulcer, epidemiology, Quality indicator, incidence and prevalence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 17 papers reported studiest conducted in nine countries. Diderent measurement instruments were utilised to measure theincidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers. Four themes emerged from the thematic analysis, the importance of prevention and treatment, diferential diagnosis and summary minimum data set for epidemiological studies. Prevalence varies in Europe between 3 and 28%, and the locations with the highest incidences services and intensive care medicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A system of classification of pressure ulcers in their different categories and the differential diagnosis with injuries humidity reduces the misclassification of UP. Different instruments of data collection does not allow us to compare results between different countries but identifies different contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":77393,"journal":{"name":"Servir (Lisbon, Portugal)","volume":"58 1-2","pages":"10-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Servir (Lisbon, Portugal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of pressure ulcers (PU) is still a current problem in our society and a constant challenge for all professionals and health institutions. Health professionals worry increasingly about the safety of their patients in the hospital environment. However, pressure ulcers continue to be one of the most common types of injuries acquired during hospitalization.

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in community settings and care differentiated and interpret these values as indicators of quality of care.

Methods: A review of literture reporting incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcer as an outcome measure and is relation with quality indicators. Electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and EBSCO) were searched from 1 January 1999 to 31 Dezembro 2012 in the English, Spanish and Portuguese language. The MESH descriptors data were Pressure ulcer, epidemiology, Quality indicator, incidence and prevalence.

Results: The 17 papers reported studiest conducted in nine countries. Diderent measurement instruments were utilised to measure theincidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers. Four themes emerged from the thematic analysis, the importance of prevention and treatment, diferential diagnosis and summary minimum data set for epidemiological studies. Prevalence varies in Europe between 3 and 28%, and the locations with the highest incidences services and intensive care medicine.

Conclusion: A system of classification of pressure ulcers in their different categories and the differential diagnosis with injuries humidity reduces the misclassification of UP. Different instruments of data collection does not allow us to compare results between different countries but identifies different contexts.

[压疮的流行病学:将数据流行病学解释为质量指标]。
简介:压疮(PU)的发生率仍然是我们社会当前的一个问题,也是所有专业人员和卫生机构不断面临的挑战。卫生专业人员越来越担心病人在医院环境中的安全。然而,压疮仍然是住院期间最常见的损伤类型之一。目的:本研究的目的是比较压疮的发生率和患病率在社区设置和护理差异化,并解释这些值作为护理质量的指标。方法:回顾有关压疮发病率和流行率的文献,并将其作为一种预后指标,与质量指标相关。检索1999年1月1日至2012年12月31日的英文、西班牙文和葡萄牙文电子数据库(CINAHL、MEDLINE和EBSCO)。MESH描述数据为压疮、流行病学、质量指标、发病率和患病率。结果:17篇论文报道了在9个国家进行的研究。使用不同的测量仪器来测量压疮的发生率和患病率。专题分析产生了四个主题,即预防和治疗的重要性、鉴别诊断和流行病学研究的总结最小数据集。欧洲的患病率在3%至28%之间,发病率最高的地区是服务和重症监护医学。结论:对压疮进行不同类型的分类,并结合损伤湿度进行鉴别诊断,减少了UP的误诊。不同的数据收集工具使我们无法比较不同国家之间的结果,但可以确定不同的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信