Maria Nikolopoulou, Jari Ahlberg, Corine M Visscher, Hans L Hamburger, Machiel Naeije, Frank Lobbezoo
{"title":"Effects of occlusal stabilization splints on obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Maria Nikolopoulou, Jari Ahlberg, Corine M Visscher, Hans L Hamburger, Machiel Naeije, Frank Lobbezoo","doi":"10.11607/jop.967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the influence of occlusal stabilization splints on sleep-related respiratory variables in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten OSA patients (47.3 ± 11.7 years of age) received a stabilization splint in the maxilla. All patients underwent three polysomnographic recordings with their splint in situ, and three recordings without their splint in situ, using a randomized crossover design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated-measures ANOVAs did not yield statistically significant differences in the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) or in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), neither between the three nights without the stabilization splint (AHI: F = 2.757, P = .090; ESS: F = 0.153, P = .860) nor between the nights with the splint in situ (AHI: F = 0.815, P = .458; ESS: F = 0.231, P = .796). However, independent ANOVAs revealed that the mean AHI of the three nights with the stabilization splint in situ (17.4 ± 7.0 events/hour) was significantly higher than that of the nights without the splint in situ (15.9 ± 6.4 events/hour) (F = 7.203, P = .025). The mean increase in AHI with the splint in situ was 1.4 ± 1.7 (95% confidence interval = -1.9-4.7). No difference in ESS was found when both conditions were compared (F = 1.000, P = .343).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of an occlusal stabilization splint is associated with a risk of aggravation of OSA; however, the effect size was small, which reduces the clinical relevance of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 3","pages":"199-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.967","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
Abstract
Aims: To assess the influence of occlusal stabilization splints on sleep-related respiratory variables in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients.
Methods: Ten OSA patients (47.3 ± 11.7 years of age) received a stabilization splint in the maxilla. All patients underwent three polysomnographic recordings with their splint in situ, and three recordings without their splint in situ, using a randomized crossover design.
Results: Repeated-measures ANOVAs did not yield statistically significant differences in the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) or in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), neither between the three nights without the stabilization splint (AHI: F = 2.757, P = .090; ESS: F = 0.153, P = .860) nor between the nights with the splint in situ (AHI: F = 0.815, P = .458; ESS: F = 0.231, P = .796). However, independent ANOVAs revealed that the mean AHI of the three nights with the stabilization splint in situ (17.4 ± 7.0 events/hour) was significantly higher than that of the nights without the splint in situ (15.9 ± 6.4 events/hour) (F = 7.203, P = .025). The mean increase in AHI with the splint in situ was 1.4 ± 1.7 (95% confidence interval = -1.9-4.7). No difference in ESS was found when both conditions were compared (F = 1.000, P = .343).
Conclusion: The use of an occlusal stabilization splint is associated with a risk of aggravation of OSA; however, the effect size was small, which reduces the clinical relevance of the study.
目的:评价咬合稳定夹板对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者睡眠相关呼吸变量的影响。方法:对10例OSA患者(47.3±11.7岁)采用上颌骨固定夹板。采用随机交叉设计,所有患者在夹板固定的情况下进行了三次多导睡眠图记录,在不固定夹板的情况下进行了三次记录。结果:重复测量方差分析(anova)在没有使用稳定夹板的三个晚上之间,呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)或Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)均无统计学意义差异(AHI: F = 2.757, P = 0.090;ESS: F = 0.153, P = 0.860),而在夹板原位放置的两晚之间(AHI: F = 0.815, P = 0.458;Ess: f = 0.231, p = .796)。然而,独立方差分析显示,放置固定夹板的3个晚上的平均AHI(17.4±7.0事件/小时)显著高于未放置固定夹板的3个晚上(15.9±6.4事件/小时)(F = 7.203, P = 0.025)。固定夹板后AHI平均升高1.4±1.7(95%可信区间= -1.9-4.7)。两种情况下的ESS比较无差异(F = 1.000, P = .343)。结论:使用咬合稳定夹板与OSA加重的风险相关;然而,效应量很小,这降低了研究的临床相关性。