Cochrane Review: Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Brian Reichow, Amanda M Steiner, Fred Volkmar
{"title":"Cochrane Review: Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)","authors":"Brian Reichow,&nbsp;Amanda M Steiner,&nbsp;Fred Volkmar","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Since autism was first described, major difficulties in social interaction have been a defining feature of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Social skills groups are a common intervention for individuals with ASD. Although a frequently recommended practice, the few studies that have addressed the efficacy of social skills groups have shown mixed results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the effectiveness of social skills groups for improving social competence, social communication, and quality of life for people with ASD who are six to 21 years of age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched the following databases in December 2011: CENTRAL (2011 Issue 4), MEDLINE (1948 to November Week 3, 2011), EMBASE (1980 to Week 50, 2011), PsycINFO (1887 to December Week 2, 2011), CINAHL (1937 to current), ERIC (1966 to current), Sociological Abstracts (1952 to current), OCLC WorldCat (12 December 2011), Social Science Citation Index (1970 to 16 December 2011), and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (20 December 2011). We also searched the reference lists of published papers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\n \n <p>Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing treatment (social skills groups) with a control group who were not receiving the treatment for participants aged six to 21 years with ASD. The control group could be no intervention, wait list, or treatment as usual. Outcomes sought were standardized measures of social competence, social communication, quality of life, emotion recognition, and any other specific behaviors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\n \n <p>Two review authors independently selected and appraised studies for inclusion and assessed the risk of bias in each included study. All outcome data were continuous and standardized mean difference effect sizes (ES) with small sample correction were calculated. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis where possible.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main results</h3>\n \n <p>We included five RCTs evaluating the effects of social skills groups in 196 participants with ASD aged 6 to 21 years old. The results show there is some evidence that social skills groups improve overall social competence (ES = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.78, P = 0.003) and friendship quality (ES = 0.41, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.81, P = 0.04) for this population. No differences were found between treatment and control groups in relation to emotional recognition (ES = 0.34, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.88, P = 0.21) assessed in two studies or social communication as related to the understanding of idioms (ES = 0.05, 95% CI -0.63 to 0.72, P = 0.89), which was assessed in only one study. Two additional quality of life outcomes were evaluated, with results of single studies suggesting decreases in loneliness (ES = -0.66, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.17) but no effect on child or parental depression. No adverse events were reported.</p>\n \n <p>Given the nature of the intervention and the selected outcome measures, the risk of performance and detection bias are high. There is limited generalizability from the studies as they were all conducted in the US; they focused mainly on children aged 7 to 12, and the participants were all of average or above average intelligence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Authors' conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There is some evidence that social skills groups can improve social competence for some children and adolescents with ASD. More research is needed to draw more robust conclusions, especially with respect to improvements in quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 years with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)</p>\n \n <p>Social deficits remain one of the most difficult areas for individuals with autism spectrum disorders, especially for those with average or above average cognitive skills. An intervention often used to treat social deficits for these individuals is social skills groups. This review synthesized the results of five randomized controlled trials of social skills groups including 196 individuals with autism spectrum disorders (aged 6 to 21 years). We found individuals receiving treatment showed some indications of improved social competence and better friendships when compared with those not receiving treatment. Participants receiving treatment also showed indications of less loneliness. The ability to recognize different emotions was measured in two studies and there was no evidence that it was improved by taking part in a social skills group. Social communication as it relates to idiomatic expressions was only reported in one study and no significant differences between treatment and control group were found. Nor was there evidence of a beneficial effect of social skills groups on parental or child depression. No adverse effects were reported in the studies. Limitations of this review include a small number of studies and participants, and a high risk of bias due to parents knowing whether their child was in the intervention group or not. The studies focused mainly on children with ASD aged 7 to 12 with average or above average intelligence, and they were all carried out in the US.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1903","citationCount":"118","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 118

Abstract

Background

Since autism was first described, major difficulties in social interaction have been a defining feature of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Social skills groups are a common intervention for individuals with ASD. Although a frequently recommended practice, the few studies that have addressed the efficacy of social skills groups have shown mixed results.

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of social skills groups for improving social competence, social communication, and quality of life for people with ASD who are six to 21 years of age.

Search methods

We searched the following databases in December 2011: CENTRAL (2011 Issue 4), MEDLINE (1948 to November Week 3, 2011), EMBASE (1980 to Week 50, 2011), PsycINFO (1887 to December Week 2, 2011), CINAHL (1937 to current), ERIC (1966 to current), Sociological Abstracts (1952 to current), OCLC WorldCat (12 December 2011), Social Science Citation Index (1970 to 16 December 2011), and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (20 December 2011). We also searched the reference lists of published papers.

Selection criteria

Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing treatment (social skills groups) with a control group who were not receiving the treatment for participants aged six to 21 years with ASD. The control group could be no intervention, wait list, or treatment as usual. Outcomes sought were standardized measures of social competence, social communication, quality of life, emotion recognition, and any other specific behaviors.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors independently selected and appraised studies for inclusion and assessed the risk of bias in each included study. All outcome data were continuous and standardized mean difference effect sizes (ES) with small sample correction were calculated. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis where possible.

Main results

We included five RCTs evaluating the effects of social skills groups in 196 participants with ASD aged 6 to 21 years old. The results show there is some evidence that social skills groups improve overall social competence (ES = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.78, P = 0.003) and friendship quality (ES = 0.41, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.81, P = 0.04) for this population. No differences were found between treatment and control groups in relation to emotional recognition (ES = 0.34, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.88, P = 0.21) assessed in two studies or social communication as related to the understanding of idioms (ES = 0.05, 95% CI -0.63 to 0.72, P = 0.89), which was assessed in only one study. Two additional quality of life outcomes were evaluated, with results of single studies suggesting decreases in loneliness (ES = -0.66, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.17) but no effect on child or parental depression. No adverse events were reported.

Given the nature of the intervention and the selected outcome measures, the risk of performance and detection bias are high. There is limited generalizability from the studies as they were all conducted in the US; they focused mainly on children aged 7 to 12, and the participants were all of average or above average intelligence.

Authors' conclusions

There is some evidence that social skills groups can improve social competence for some children and adolescents with ASD. More research is needed to draw more robust conclusions, especially with respect to improvements in quality of life.

Plain Language Summary

Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 years with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Social deficits remain one of the most difficult areas for individuals with autism spectrum disorders, especially for those with average or above average cognitive skills. An intervention often used to treat social deficits for these individuals is social skills groups. This review synthesized the results of five randomized controlled trials of social skills groups including 196 individuals with autism spectrum disorders (aged 6 to 21 years). We found individuals receiving treatment showed some indications of improved social competence and better friendships when compared with those not receiving treatment. Participants receiving treatment also showed indications of less loneliness. The ability to recognize different emotions was measured in two studies and there was no evidence that it was improved by taking part in a social skills group. Social communication as it relates to idiomatic expressions was only reported in one study and no significant differences between treatment and control group were found. Nor was there evidence of a beneficial effect of social skills groups on parental or child depression. No adverse effects were reported in the studies. Limitations of this review include a small number of studies and participants, and a high risk of bias due to parents knowing whether their child was in the intervention group or not. The studies focused mainly on children with ASD aged 7 to 12 with average or above average intelligence, and they were all carried out in the US.

Cochrane综述:6 - 21岁自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的社交技能小组
自自闭症首次被描述以来,社会交往方面的主要困难一直是自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的一个典型特征。社交技能小组是对自闭症患者的一种常见干预。虽然这是一种经常被推荐的做法,但少数研究表明,社交技能小组的效果好坏参半。目的探讨社交技能小组在改善6 ~ 21岁ASD患者社交能力、社交沟通和生活质量方面的效果。我们在2011年12月检索了以下数据库:CENTRAL(2011年第4期)、MEDLINE(1948年至2011年11月第3周)、EMBASE(1980年至2011年第50周)、PsycINFO(1887年至2011年12月第2周)、CINAHL(1937年至今)、ERIC(1966年至今)、Sociological Abstracts(1952年至今)、OCLC WorldCat(2011年12月12日)、Social Science Citation Index(1970年至2011年12月16日)和metareregister of Controlled Trials(2011年12月20日)。我们还检索了已发表论文的参考文献。随机对照试验(rct)比较治疗(社会技能组)和未接受治疗的6 - 21岁ASD参与者的对照组。对照组可以不进行干预,等待名单,或照常治疗。所寻求的结果是社会能力、社会沟通、生活质量、情绪识别和任何其他特定行为的标准化测量。资料收集和分析两位综述作者独立选择和评价纳入的研究,并评估每个纳入研究的偏倚风险。所有结局数据均为连续数据,并计算经小样本校正的标准化平均差异效应量(ES)。我们尽可能进行随机效应荟萃分析。我们纳入了5项随机对照试验,评估了196名6至21岁的ASD患者的社交技能组的效果。结果显示,有一些证据表明,社交技能组提高了这一人群的整体社交能力(ES = 0.47, 95%置信区间(CI) 0.16至0.78,P = 0.003)和友谊质量(ES = 0.41, 95% CI 0.02至0.81,P = 0.04)。在两项研究中,实验组和对照组在情绪识别(ES = 0.34, 95% CI -0.20至0.88,P = 0.21)和社会沟通(ES = 0.05, 95% CI -0.63至0.72,P = 0.89)方面没有发现差异,这两项研究仅在一项研究中进行了评估。对另外两个生活质量结果进行了评估,单个研究的结果表明孤独感减少(ES = -0.66, 95% CI -1.15至-0.17),但对儿童或父母的抑郁症没有影响。无不良事件报告。考虑到干预的性质和选择的结果测量,执行和检测偏差的风险很高。这些研究的普遍性有限,因为它们都是在美国进行的;他们主要关注7到12岁的儿童,参与者都是中等或中等以上的智力水平。有一些证据表明,社交技能小组可以提高一些患有自闭症的儿童和青少年的社交能力。需要更多的研究来得出更有力的结论,特别是在改善生活质量方面。6 - 21岁自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的社交技能小组对于自闭症谱系障碍患者来说,社交缺陷仍然是最困难的领域之一,尤其是对于那些认知能力一般或高于平均水平的患者。通常用于治疗这些人社会缺陷的干预措施是社会技能小组。这篇综述综合了5项随机对照试验的结果,这些试验包括196名6至21岁的自闭症谱系障碍患者。我们发现,与没有接受治疗的人相比,接受治疗的人在社交能力和友谊方面表现出了一些改善。接受治疗的参与者也显示出孤独感减少的迹象。两项研究测量了识别不同情绪的能力,没有证据表明参加社交技能小组能提高这种能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信