Efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine in Japanese de novo renal transplant patients: 12-month results.

Kota Takahashi, Kazuharu Uchida, Norio Yoshimura, Shiro Takahara, Satoshi Teraoka, Rie Teshima, Catherine Cornu-Artis, Eiji Kobayashi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine in Japanese de novo renal transplant patients: 12-month results.","authors":"Kota Takahashi,&nbsp;Kazuharu Uchida,&nbsp;Norio Yoshimura,&nbsp;Shiro Takahara,&nbsp;Satoshi Teraoka,&nbsp;Rie Teshima,&nbsp;Catherine Cornu-Artis,&nbsp;Eiji Kobayashi","doi":"10.1186/2047-1440-2-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No study to date has evaluated the efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine in Japanese de-novo renal transplant (RTx) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 12-month, multicenter, open-label study randomized (1:1) 122 Japanese de-novo RTx patients to either an everolimus regimen (1.5 mg/day starting dose (target trough: 3 to 8 ng/ml) + reduced-dose cyclosporine) or a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) regimen (2 g/day + standard dose cyclosporine). All patients received basiliximab and corticosteroids. Key endpoints at month 12 were composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up) and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clear cyclosporine exposure reduction was achieved in the everolimus group throughout the study (52% reduction at month 12). Month 12 efficacy failure rates showed everolimus 1.5 mg to be non-inferior to MMF (11.5% vs. 11.5%). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 12 was 58.00 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in the everolimus group versus 55.25 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in the MMF group (P = 0.063). Overall, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between the groups with some differences in line with the known safety profile of the treatments. The everolimus group had a higher incidence of wound healing events and edema, whereas a higher rate of cytomegalovirus infections was reported in the MMF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed the efficacy of everolimus 1.5 mg/day (target trough: 3 to 8 ng/ml) in Japanese RTx patients for preventing acute rejection, while allowing for substantial cyclosporine sparing. Renal function and safety findings were comparable with previous reports from other RTx populations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00658320.</p>","PeriodicalId":89864,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation research","volume":"2 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2047-1440-2-14","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-1440-2-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background: No study to date has evaluated the efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine in Japanese de-novo renal transplant (RTx) patients.

Methods: This 12-month, multicenter, open-label study randomized (1:1) 122 Japanese de-novo RTx patients to either an everolimus regimen (1.5 mg/day starting dose (target trough: 3 to 8 ng/ml) + reduced-dose cyclosporine) or a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) regimen (2 g/day + standard dose cyclosporine). All patients received basiliximab and corticosteroids. Key endpoints at month 12 were composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up) and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4).

Results: Clear cyclosporine exposure reduction was achieved in the everolimus group throughout the study (52% reduction at month 12). Month 12 efficacy failure rates showed everolimus 1.5 mg to be non-inferior to MMF (11.5% vs. 11.5%). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 12 was 58.00 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in the everolimus group versus 55.25 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in the MMF group (P = 0.063). Overall, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between the groups with some differences in line with the known safety profile of the treatments. The everolimus group had a higher incidence of wound healing events and edema, whereas a higher rate of cytomegalovirus infections was reported in the MMF group.

Conclusions: This study confirmed the efficacy of everolimus 1.5 mg/day (target trough: 3 to 8 ng/ml) in Japanese RTx patients for preventing acute rejection, while allowing for substantial cyclosporine sparing. Renal function and safety findings were comparable with previous reports from other RTx populations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00658320.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

浓度控制依维莫司与减少剂量环孢素在日本新肾移植患者中的疗效和安全性:12个月的结果。
背景:迄今为止没有研究评估依维莫司与环孢素减少暴露在日本重新肾移植(RTx)患者中的有效性和安全性。方法:这项为期12个月、多中心、开放标签的研究将122名日本新生RTx患者随机(1:1)分配到依维莫司方案(1.5 mg/天起始剂量(目标谷:3至8 ng/ml) +减少剂量的环孢素)或霉酚酸酯(MMF)方案(2g /天+标准剂量的环孢素)。所有患者均接受basiliximab和皮质类固醇治疗。第12个月的关键终点是综合疗效失败(经活检证实的急性排斥反应、移植物丢失、死亡或随访失败)和肾功能(估计肾小球滤过率;肾病患者饮食的改变[4]。结果:在整个研究过程中,依维莫司组环孢素暴露明显减少(第12个月减少52%)。第12个月疗效失败率显示依维莫司1.5 mg不逊于MMF(11.5%比11.5%)。依维莫司组第12个月肾小球滤过率中值为58.00 ml/min /1.73 m2,而MMF组为55.25 ml/min /1.73 m2 (P = 0.063)。总的来说,不良事件的发生率在两组之间具有可比性,但根据已知的治疗安全性,存在一些差异。依维莫司组有较高的伤口愈合事件和水肿发生率,而MMF组有较高的巨细胞病毒感染率。结论:本研究证实了依维莫司1.5 mg/天(靶谷:3至8 ng/ml)在日本RTx患者中预防急性排斥反应的有效性,同时允许大量的环孢素节约。肾功能和安全性结果与其他RTx人群的先前报告相当。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT00658320。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信