Theory of Mind Deficit versus Faulty Procedural Memory in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Autism Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-06-04 DOI:10.1155/2013/128264
Miguel Ángel Romero-Munguía
{"title":"Theory of Mind Deficit versus Faulty Procedural Memory in Autism Spectrum Disorders.","authors":"Miguel Ángel Romero-Munguía","doi":"10.1155/2013/128264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have impairments in social interaction, communicative capacity, and behavioral flexibility (core triad). Three major cognitive theories (theory of mind deficit, weak central coherence, and executive dysfunction) seem to explain many of these impairments. Currently, however, the empathizing-systemizing (a newer version of the theory of mind deficit account) and mnesic imbalance theories are the only ones that attempt to explain all these core triadic symptoms of ASD On the other hand, theory of mind deficit in empathizing-systemizing theory is the most influential account for ASD, but its counterpart in the mnesic imbalance theory, faulty procedural memory, seems to occur earlier in development; consequently, this might be a better solution to the problem of the etiology of ASD, if it truly meets the precedence criterion. Hence, in the present paper I review the reasoning in favor of the theory of mind deficit but with a new interpretation based on the mnesic imbalance theory, which posits that faulty procedural memory causes deficits in several cognitive skills, resulting in poor performance in theory of mind tasks. </p>","PeriodicalId":8659,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research and Treatment","volume":"2013 ","pages":"128264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/128264","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/128264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have impairments in social interaction, communicative capacity, and behavioral flexibility (core triad). Three major cognitive theories (theory of mind deficit, weak central coherence, and executive dysfunction) seem to explain many of these impairments. Currently, however, the empathizing-systemizing (a newer version of the theory of mind deficit account) and mnesic imbalance theories are the only ones that attempt to explain all these core triadic symptoms of ASD On the other hand, theory of mind deficit in empathizing-systemizing theory is the most influential account for ASD, but its counterpart in the mnesic imbalance theory, faulty procedural memory, seems to occur earlier in development; consequently, this might be a better solution to the problem of the etiology of ASD, if it truly meets the precedence criterion. Hence, in the present paper I review the reasoning in favor of the theory of mind deficit but with a new interpretation based on the mnesic imbalance theory, which posits that faulty procedural memory causes deficits in several cognitive skills, resulting in poor performance in theory of mind tasks.

自闭症谱系障碍的心智缺陷与错误程序记忆理论。
患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体在社会互动、沟通能力和行为灵活性(核心三联征)方面存在缺陷。三种主要的认知理论(心智缺陷理论、弱中央一致性理论和执行功能障碍理论)似乎可以解释许多这些损伤。然而,目前,只有共情-系统化理论(心智缺陷理论的更新版本)和失忆失衡理论试图解释ASD的所有这些核心三联征。另一方面,共情-系统化理论中的心智缺陷理论是ASD最具影响力的解释,但其在失忆失衡理论中的对应理论——程序性记忆缺陷,似乎发生在发展的早期;因此,如果它确实符合优先标准,这可能是一个更好的解决ASD病因问题的方法。因此,在本文中,我回顾了有利于心智缺陷理论的推理,但基于失忆不平衡理论的新解释,该理论认为错误的程序性记忆会导致几种认知技能的缺陷,从而导致心智理论任务的不良表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信