Evaluation of 2 real-time PCR assays for in vitro diagnostic use in the rapid and multiplex detection of EGFR gene mutations in NSCLC.

Anthony T C Wong, Rene M Y To, Chris L P Wong, Wai-Kong Chan, Edmond S K Ma
{"title":"Evaluation of 2 real-time PCR assays for in vitro diagnostic use in the rapid and multiplex detection of EGFR gene mutations in NSCLC.","authors":"Anthony T C Wong,&nbsp;Rene M Y To,&nbsp;Chris L P Wong,&nbsp;Wai-Kong Chan,&nbsp;Edmond S K Ma","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827fedcc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in non-small cell lung cancer predict for a favorable clinical response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Although Sanger sequencing is a conventional method to detect EGFR gene mutations, multiplex real-time allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems are increasingly used in the routine molecular diagnostic setting. We aim to evaluate 2 proprietary real-time PCR assays (cobas and therascreen) against Sanger sequencing in the detection of EGFR gene mutations. The overall concordance rate between cobas and therascreen assays with Sanger sequencing was 89% and 88%, respectively, and increased to 96% and 98%, respectively, if the mutations not covered were excluded. The cobas assay showed a superior coverage of exon 20 mutations, but L861Q was not targeted. The nature of specimen, DNA integrity, and tumor cell content are factors that affect the assay performance. DNA extracted from cell block and clot of pleural fluid gave rise to 1 invalid call and 1 false-negative result by the cobas assay and 1 missed T790M mutation and 1 false-negative result by the therascreen assay. Both assays are around 5 times more expensive compared with Sanger sequencing in terms of reagent cost. We conclude that both assays prove to be a rapid, simple, and validated method in detecting the most common and clinically significant EGFR gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Although less convenient compared with real-time PCR assays, Sanger sequencing is cheaper in terms of reagent cost and allows the detection of rare or novel EGFR gene mutations. </p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"22 3","pages":"138-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827fedcc","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827fedcc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in non-small cell lung cancer predict for a favorable clinical response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Although Sanger sequencing is a conventional method to detect EGFR gene mutations, multiplex real-time allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems are increasingly used in the routine molecular diagnostic setting. We aim to evaluate 2 proprietary real-time PCR assays (cobas and therascreen) against Sanger sequencing in the detection of EGFR gene mutations. The overall concordance rate between cobas and therascreen assays with Sanger sequencing was 89% and 88%, respectively, and increased to 96% and 98%, respectively, if the mutations not covered were excluded. The cobas assay showed a superior coverage of exon 20 mutations, but L861Q was not targeted. The nature of specimen, DNA integrity, and tumor cell content are factors that affect the assay performance. DNA extracted from cell block and clot of pleural fluid gave rise to 1 invalid call and 1 false-negative result by the cobas assay and 1 missed T790M mutation and 1 false-negative result by the therascreen assay. Both assays are around 5 times more expensive compared with Sanger sequencing in terms of reagent cost. We conclude that both assays prove to be a rapid, simple, and validated method in detecting the most common and clinically significant EGFR gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Although less convenient compared with real-time PCR assays, Sanger sequencing is cheaper in terms of reagent cost and allows the detection of rare or novel EGFR gene mutations.

2种实时PCR法在体外诊断中快速、多重检测非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变的评价
非小细胞肺癌中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因的激活突变预示着酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的良好临床反应。尽管Sanger测序是检测EGFR基因突变的常规方法,多重实时等位基因特异性聚合酶链反应(PCR)系统越来越多地用于常规分子诊断设置。我们的目标是评估两种专有的实时PCR检测方法(cobas和therascreen)在检测EGFR基因突变方面与Sanger测序的对比。cobas和therascreen试验与Sanger测序的总体一致性率分别为89%和88%,如果排除未涵盖的突变,则分别增加到96%和98%。cobas分析显示外显子20突变的覆盖率较高,但L861Q不是靶向的。标本的性质、DNA的完整性和肿瘤细胞含量是影响测定性能的因素。从细胞块和胸腔积液凝块中提取DNA, cobas法无效1例,假阴性1例;therascreen法遗漏T790M突变1例,假阴性1例。就试剂成本而言,这两种测定法都比Sanger测序法贵约5倍。我们得出的结论是,这两种检测方法都证明是一种快速、简单、有效的方法,可检测非小细胞肺癌中最常见和具有临床意义的EGFR基因突变。尽管与实时PCR相比,Sanger测序不太方便,但就试剂成本而言,Sanger测序更便宜,并且可以检测罕见或新的EGFR基因突变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信