Transurethral resection of prostate abscess: is it different from conventional transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia?

ISRN urology Pub Date : 2013-06-11 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/109505
Neeraj Kumar Goyal, Apul Goel, Satyanarayan Sankhwar, Divakar Dalela
{"title":"Transurethral resection of prostate abscess: is it different from conventional transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia?","authors":"Neeraj Kumar Goyal,&nbsp;Apul Goel,&nbsp;Satyanarayan Sankhwar,&nbsp;Divakar Dalela","doi":"10.1155/2013/109505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. To present our experience of prostate abscess management by modified transurethral resection (TUR) technique. Methods. Seventeen men with prostate abscess undergoing TUR between 2003 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Details of demography, surgical procedures, complications, and followup were noted. Results. With a mean age of 61.53 ± 8.58 years, all patients had multifocal abscess cavities. Initially, 6 men underwent classical TUR similar to the technique used for benign prostatic enlargement (group 1). Next, 11 men underwent modified TUR (group 2) in which bladder neck and anterior zone were not resected. The abscess cavities resolved completely, and no patient required a second intervention. One patient in group 1 and three in group 2 had postoperative fever requiring parenteral antibiotics (P = 0.916). Three patients in group 1 had transient urinary incontinence, whereas none of the patients in group 2 had this complication (P = 0.055). Four and five men in group 1 and 2 reported retrograde ejaculation, respectively (P = 0.740). Conclusion. The modified technique of prostate resection edges over conventional TURP in the form of reduced morbidity but maintains its high success rate for complete abscess drainage. It alleviates the need for secondary procedures, having an apparent advantage over limited drainage techniques. Use of this technique is emphasized in cases associated with BPH and lack of proper preoperative imaging. </p>","PeriodicalId":89401,"journal":{"name":"ISRN urology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"109505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/109505","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/109505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Purpose. To present our experience of prostate abscess management by modified transurethral resection (TUR) technique. Methods. Seventeen men with prostate abscess undergoing TUR between 2003 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Details of demography, surgical procedures, complications, and followup were noted. Results. With a mean age of 61.53 ± 8.58 years, all patients had multifocal abscess cavities. Initially, 6 men underwent classical TUR similar to the technique used for benign prostatic enlargement (group 1). Next, 11 men underwent modified TUR (group 2) in which bladder neck and anterior zone were not resected. The abscess cavities resolved completely, and no patient required a second intervention. One patient in group 1 and three in group 2 had postoperative fever requiring parenteral antibiotics (P = 0.916). Three patients in group 1 had transient urinary incontinence, whereas none of the patients in group 2 had this complication (P = 0.055). Four and five men in group 1 and 2 reported retrograde ejaculation, respectively (P = 0.740). Conclusion. The modified technique of prostate resection edges over conventional TURP in the form of reduced morbidity but maintains its high success rate for complete abscess drainage. It alleviates the need for secondary procedures, having an apparent advantage over limited drainage techniques. Use of this technique is emphasized in cases associated with BPH and lack of proper preoperative imaging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经尿道前列腺脓肿切除术:与常规经尿道前列腺增生切除术有何不同?
目的。介绍改良经尿道前列腺脓肿切除术治疗前列腺脓肿的经验。方法。回顾性分析了2003年至2011年间17例前列腺脓肿行TUR的患者。详细的人口统计,外科手术,并发症和随访记录。结果。患者平均年龄61.53±8.58岁,均为多灶性脓肿腔。最初,6名男性接受了与良性前列腺肿大类似的经典TUR(第一组)。接下来,11名男性接受了改良的TUR(第二组),其中膀胱颈部和前区未被切除。脓肿腔完全消退,没有患者需要第二次干预。1组术后发热1例,2组术后发热3例(P = 0.916)。1组3例患者出现一过性尿失禁,2组无此并发症(P = 0.055)。第1组和第2组分别有4名和5名男性报告逆行射精(P = 0.740)。结论。改良的前列腺切除术技术在降低发病率方面优于传统的TURP,但在完全脓肿引流方面仍保持其高成功率。它减少了对二次手术的需要,与有限的引流技术相比具有明显的优势。在伴有前列腺增生和术前缺乏适当影像学检查的病例中,强调使用该技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书