Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-05-30 DOI:10.1155/2013/150492
Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros, Michael J Levy, Manuel Van Domselaar, Fernando González-Panizo, Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina, Daniel Boixeda-Miquel, Diego Juzgado-Lucas, Agustin Albillos
{"title":"Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses.","authors":"Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros, Michael J Levy, Manuel Van Domselaar, Fernando González-Panizo, Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina, Daniel Boixeda-Miquel, Diego Juzgado-Lucas, Agustin Albillos","doi":"10.1155/2013/150492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses.","PeriodicalId":11288,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","volume":"2013 ","pages":"150492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/150492","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超声内镜引导下细针抽吸正中纵隔肺肿块的诊断率及安全性。
未标明:背景和目的。EUS-FNA是一种准确、安全的纵隔淋巴结活检技术。然而,很少有关于EUS-FNA在活检中央肺肿块中的作用的数据。本研究的目的是评估EUS-FNA对不确定的中央纵隔肺肿块的诊断率和安全性。方法。设计:对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性审查;noncomparative。单位:三级转诊中心。从2004年10月至2010年12月,所有位于食管附近的肺肿块患者均接受EUS-FNA检查。主要观察指标:EUS-FNA诊断的准确性和安全性。结果:连续纳入73例患者。EUS允许62例(85%)患者检测到,11例患者缺乏视觉禁止FNA。样本病变中,1例(1/62 = 1.6%)为良性肺肿块(错构瘤),其余61例(61/62 = 98.4%)为恶性肿块(原发性肺癌:55/61 = 90%;肺转移:6/61 = 10%)。EUS-FNA的敏感性为96.7%,特异性为100%,准确性为96.7%。当考虑未见肿块时,敏感性为80.8%。1例患者发生气胸(1/62 = 1.6%)。结论。EUS-FNA是一种准确、安全的诊断中纵隔肺肿块的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信