Complications and Unfavorable Clinical Outcomes in Obese and Overweight Patients Treated for Adult Lumbar or Thoracolumbar Scoliosis With Combined Anterior/Posterior Surgery.

Q Medicine
Mitsuru Yagi, Ravi Patel, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
{"title":"Complications and Unfavorable Clinical Outcomes in Obese and Overweight Patients Treated for Adult Lumbar or Thoracolumbar Scoliosis With Combined Anterior/Posterior Surgery.","authors":"Mitsuru Yagi,&nbsp;Ravi Patel,&nbsp;Oheneba Boachie-Adjei","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182999526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Combined anterior/posterior (A/P) spinal fusion with instrumentation has been used for many years in the treatment of adult thoracolumbar and lumbar (TL/L) scoliosis. However, the risk factors for complications and poor clinical outcomes with this procedure are not well known.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the risk factors for poor clinical outcomes in a series of adult lumbar or scoliosis patients undergoing combined A/P-instrumented spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study was a retrospective case series of surgically treated adult lumbar or thoracolumbar scoliosis patients.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>From 1998 to 2006, 57 patients with diagnoses of adult idiopathic scoliosis or degenerative TL/L scoliosis underwent combined A/P spinal instrumentation and fusion at 1 institution, performed by 1 senior author.</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements: </strong>The preoperative and postoperative outcome measurements included self-report measurements, physiological measurements, and functional measurements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of this patient group was performed to evaluate patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, pain, curve progression, and complications. Radiographic measurements included coronal balance, sagittal vertical axis, Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and during follow-up. In terms of risk factors, bone mineral density, body mass index, age, kyphosis, and fusion to the sacrum were reviewed. Postoperative Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire outcome scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and anterior surgical site pain (ASSP) were also evaluated. Means were compared with the Student t test and the χ test. Logistic regression analyses were used to predict the probabilities and the odds ratios (ORs) of the risk factors for poor clinical outcomes. A P-value of <0.05 with a confidence interval of 95% was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients had adult idiopathic scoliosis, and 7 patients had degenerative scoliosis. The average age at surgery was 53.8 years (34-74 y), and the average follow-up was 4.8 years (2-11 y). Coronal correction for thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbosacral curves improved significantly. The degree of sagittal curve and coronal and sagittal balance were not significantly changed after surgery or at the final follow-up. ODI, the pain intensity domain of the ODI, and ASSP were significantly worse in obese and overweight patients, whereas OR time, estimated blood loss, and number of fused vertebrae were not different in the entire group (P=0.03 for ODI, P=0.002 for pain domain of ODI, and P=0.003 for ASSP). Logistic regression analyses for the risk factors of poor clinical outcomes indicated obesity and overweight as risk factors for poor clinical outcomes (OR=6.25 for ODI and 5.88 for ODI pain intensity score). A significantly higher rate of major complications occurred in this group compared to the entire group (30.4%, P=0.04). Low bone mineral density, old age, kyphosis, and fusion to the sacrum were not risk factors for poor clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the good function scores and acceptable pain levels in most patients, the ODI scores of obese and overweight patients were worse compared to the rest of the patients in this study. Significantly worse scores on the pain intensity domain of the ODI and ASSP differences were likely caused by extensive dissection of the abdominal wall and psoas muscles and the technical difficulty of achieving an anterior approach to the thoracolumbar spine. Radiographs revealed no progression of the TL/L curves. This study indicates that obesity and overweight are potential risk factors for combined A/P-instrumented spinal fusion in patients with adult TL/L scoliosis, perhaps due to the technical difficulty of achieving an anterior approach to the thoracolumbar spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 6","pages":"E368-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182999526","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182999526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Background context: Combined anterior/posterior (A/P) spinal fusion with instrumentation has been used for many years in the treatment of adult thoracolumbar and lumbar (TL/L) scoliosis. However, the risk factors for complications and poor clinical outcomes with this procedure are not well known.

Purpose: To assess the risk factors for poor clinical outcomes in a series of adult lumbar or scoliosis patients undergoing combined A/P-instrumented spinal fusion.

Study design: This study was a retrospective case series of surgically treated adult lumbar or thoracolumbar scoliosis patients.

Patient sample: From 1998 to 2006, 57 patients with diagnoses of adult idiopathic scoliosis or degenerative TL/L scoliosis underwent combined A/P spinal instrumentation and fusion at 1 institution, performed by 1 senior author.

Outcome measurements: The preoperative and postoperative outcome measurements included self-report measurements, physiological measurements, and functional measurements.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of this patient group was performed to evaluate patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, pain, curve progression, and complications. Radiographic measurements included coronal balance, sagittal vertical axis, Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and during follow-up. In terms of risk factors, bone mineral density, body mass index, age, kyphosis, and fusion to the sacrum were reviewed. Postoperative Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire outcome scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and anterior surgical site pain (ASSP) were also evaluated. Means were compared with the Student t test and the χ test. Logistic regression analyses were used to predict the probabilities and the odds ratios (ORs) of the risk factors for poor clinical outcomes. A P-value of <0.05 with a confidence interval of 95% was considered significant.

Results: Fifty patients had adult idiopathic scoliosis, and 7 patients had degenerative scoliosis. The average age at surgery was 53.8 years (34-74 y), and the average follow-up was 4.8 years (2-11 y). Coronal correction for thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbosacral curves improved significantly. The degree of sagittal curve and coronal and sagittal balance were not significantly changed after surgery or at the final follow-up. ODI, the pain intensity domain of the ODI, and ASSP were significantly worse in obese and overweight patients, whereas OR time, estimated blood loss, and number of fused vertebrae were not different in the entire group (P=0.03 for ODI, P=0.002 for pain domain of ODI, and P=0.003 for ASSP). Logistic regression analyses for the risk factors of poor clinical outcomes indicated obesity and overweight as risk factors for poor clinical outcomes (OR=6.25 for ODI and 5.88 for ODI pain intensity score). A significantly higher rate of major complications occurred in this group compared to the entire group (30.4%, P=0.04). Low bone mineral density, old age, kyphosis, and fusion to the sacrum were not risk factors for poor clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: Despite the good function scores and acceptable pain levels in most patients, the ODI scores of obese and overweight patients were worse compared to the rest of the patients in this study. Significantly worse scores on the pain intensity domain of the ODI and ASSP differences were likely caused by extensive dissection of the abdominal wall and psoas muscles and the technical difficulty of achieving an anterior approach to the thoracolumbar spine. Radiographs revealed no progression of the TL/L curves. This study indicates that obesity and overweight are potential risk factors for combined A/P-instrumented spinal fusion in patients with adult TL/L scoliosis, perhaps due to the technical difficulty of achieving an anterior approach to the thoracolumbar spine.

前/后联合手术治疗成人腰椎或胸腰椎侧凸的肥胖和超重患者的并发症和不良临床结果
背景:前/后联合(A/P)脊柱融合术联合内固定治疗成人胸腰椎侧凸(TL/L)已使用多年。然而,这种手术的并发症和不良临床结果的危险因素尚不清楚。目的:评估一系列成人腰椎或脊柱侧弯患者行a / p联合椎体融合术不良临床结果的危险因素。研究设计:本研究是对手术治疗的成人腰椎或胸腰椎侧凸患者进行回顾性研究。患者样本:从1998年到2006年,57例诊断为成人特发性脊柱侧凸或退行性TL/L侧凸的患者在1家机构接受了联合A/P脊柱内固定和融合,由1名资深作者完成。结果测量:术前和术后结果测量包括自我报告测量、生理测量和功能测量。材料和方法:对该患者组进行回顾性研究,以评估患者满意度、功能结局、疼痛、弯曲进展和并发症。影像学测量包括术前、术后及随访期间冠状平衡、矢状垂直轴、Cobb角、胸后凸、腰椎前凸和骨盆发生率。在危险因素方面,骨密度,体重指数,年龄,后凸和骶骨融合进行了回顾。术后脊柱侧凸研究学会患者问卷结果评分、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和手术前部位疼痛(ASSP)也进行了评估。均值比较采用学生t检验和χ检验。采用Logistic回归分析预测临床预后不良危险因素的概率和比值比(or)。结果的p值:成人特发性脊柱侧凸50例,退行性脊柱侧凸7例。手术时平均年龄为53.8岁(34-74岁),平均随访时间为4.8年(2-11岁)。胸椎、胸腰椎和腰骶弯曲的冠状面矫正明显改善。矢状曲线度、冠状和矢状平衡在手术后或最终随访时无明显变化。肥胖和超重患者的ODI、ODI疼痛强度域和ASSP明显加重,而全组的OR时间、估计失血量和融合椎体数无差异(ODI的P=0.03, ODI的疼痛域P=0.002, ASSP的P=0.003)。对不良临床结局危险因素的Logistic回归分析显示,肥胖和超重是不良临床结局的危险因素(ODI疼痛强度评分OR=6.25, ODI疼痛强度评分OR= 5.88)。主要并发症发生率明显高于全组(30.4%,P=0.04)。低骨密度、老年、后凸和骶骨融合不是不良临床结果的危险因素。结论:尽管大多数患者的功能评分良好,疼痛水平可接受,但与本研究中其他患者相比,肥胖和超重患者的ODI评分更差。ODI和ASSP差异的疼痛强度域得分明显较差,可能是由于腹壁和腰肌的广泛剥离以及实现胸腰椎前路入路的技术难度所致。x线片显示TL/L曲线未进展。该研究表明,肥胖和超重是成人TL/L脊柱侧凸患者联合A/ p内固定脊柱融合术的潜在危险因素,这可能是由于实现胸腰椎前路入路的技术困难所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信