Strong-ion gap approach in patients with cardiogenic shock following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Acute cardiac care Pub Date : 2013-09-01 Epub Date: 2013-06-27 DOI:10.3109/17482941.2013.776691
Paola Attanà, Chiara Lazzeri, Marco Chiostri, Claudio Picariello, Gian Franco Gensini, Serafina Valente
{"title":"Strong-ion gap approach in patients with cardiogenic shock following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.","authors":"Paola Attanà,&nbsp;Chiara Lazzeri,&nbsp;Marco Chiostri,&nbsp;Claudio Picariello,&nbsp;Gian Franco Gensini,&nbsp;Serafina Valente","doi":"10.3109/17482941.2013.776691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess if acid-base evaluation by Stewart's approach had a clinical role in cardiogenic shock (CS) following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>There are three widely used approaches to investigate metabolic acidosis: base excess (BE), anion gap (AG) and the Stewart's approach or strong ion gap (SIG). Available studies suggest the usefulness of SIG in sepsis and trauma. No data are so far available in CS.</p><p><strong>Measurements and results: </strong>We enrolled 63 consecutive patients with CS following STEMI submitted to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). On admission, the APACHE II (Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II) score and HOMA (Homeostasis model assessment) index were assessed together with glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), quantitative BE, AG, lactate values and 12 h lactate clearance. Non-survivors showed a higher incidence of PCI failure, higher APACHE II score, lower LVEF, lower eGFR, lower 12 h lactate clearance; a higher admission lactate and more negative BE. No difference was detectable in AG and SIG. Only 3 patients exhibited pathological values of SIG (≥ 2) and only 1 of these patients died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our data the SIG approach does not seem to add further information to usual parameters in acid-base evaluation or early risk stratification in CS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":87385,"journal":{"name":"Acute cardiac care","volume":"15 3","pages":"58-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17482941.2013.776691","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute cardiac care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2013.776691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Objective: Assess if acid-base evaluation by Stewart's approach had a clinical role in cardiogenic shock (CS) following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Setting: There are three widely used approaches to investigate metabolic acidosis: base excess (BE), anion gap (AG) and the Stewart's approach or strong ion gap (SIG). Available studies suggest the usefulness of SIG in sepsis and trauma. No data are so far available in CS.

Measurements and results: We enrolled 63 consecutive patients with CS following STEMI submitted to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). On admission, the APACHE II (Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II) score and HOMA (Homeostasis model assessment) index were assessed together with glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), quantitative BE, AG, lactate values and 12 h lactate clearance. Non-survivors showed a higher incidence of PCI failure, higher APACHE II score, lower LVEF, lower eGFR, lower 12 h lactate clearance; a higher admission lactate and more negative BE. No difference was detectable in AG and SIG. Only 3 patients exhibited pathological values of SIG (≥ 2) and only 1 of these patients died.

Conclusions: According to our data the SIG approach does not seem to add further information to usual parameters in acid-base evaluation or early risk stratification in CS patients.

st段抬高型心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的强离子间隙入路。
目的:评价斯图尔特法酸碱评价在st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后心源性休克(CS)中的临床作用。背景:有三种广泛使用的方法来研究代谢性酸中毒:碱过量(BE),阴离子间隙(AG)和斯图尔特方法或强离子间隙(SIG)。现有研究表明SIG在脓毒症和创伤中的有用性。CS目前没有数据。测量和结果:我们连续招募了63例STEMI后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的CS患者。入院时,评估APACHE II(急性生理和慢性健康评估II)评分和HOMA(稳态模型评估)指数,以及肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、定量BE、AG、乳酸值和12 h乳酸清除率。非幸存者表现出更高的PCI失败发生率,更高的APACHE II评分,更低的LVEF,更低的eGFR,更低的12 h乳酸清除率;入院时乳酸浓度升高,BE呈阴性。AG与SIG无明显差异,仅有3例患者表现出SIG病理值(≥2),其中1例死亡。结论:根据我们的数据,SIG方法似乎没有为CS患者的酸碱评估或早期风险分层的常规参数提供进一步的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信