Water exchange method for colonoscopy: learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist in a U.S. community practice setting.

Leonard S Fischer, Antoinette Lumsden, Felix W Leung
{"title":"Water exchange method for colonoscopy: learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist in a U.S. community practice setting.","authors":"Leonard S Fischer,&nbsp;Antoinette Lumsden,&nbsp;Felix W Leung","doi":"10.4161/jig.23734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Water exchange colonoscopy has been reported to reduce examination discomfort and to provide salvage cleansing in unsedated or minimally sedated patients. The prolonged insertion time and perceived difficulty of insertion associated with water exchange have been cited as a barrier to its widespread use.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the feasibility of learning and using the water exchange method of colonoscopy in a U.S. community practice setting.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Quality improvement program in nonacademic community endoscopy centers.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patients undergoing sedated diagnostic, surveillance, or screening colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After direct coaching by a knowledgeable trainer, an experienced colonoscopist initiated colonoscopy using the water method. Whenever >5 min elapsed without advancing the colonoscope, conversion to air insufflation was made to ensure timely completion of the examination.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>Water Method Intention-to-treat (ITT) cecal intubation rate (CIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female patients had a significantly higher rate of past abdominal surgery and a significantly lower ITTCIR. The ITTCIR showed a progressive increase over time in both males and females to 85-90%. Mean insertion time was maintained at 9 to 10 min. The overall CIR was 99%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of water exchange did not preclude cecal intubation upon conversion to usual air insufflation in sedated patients examined by an experienced colonoscopist. With practice ITTCIR increased over time in both male and female patients. Larger volumes of water exchanged were associated with higher ITTCIR and better quality scores of bowel preparation. The data suggest that learning water exchange by a busy colonoscopist in a community practice setting is feasible and outcomes conform to accepted quality standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":89416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","volume":"2 3","pages":"128-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655367/pdf/jig0203_0128.pdf","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.23734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: Water exchange colonoscopy has been reported to reduce examination discomfort and to provide salvage cleansing in unsedated or minimally sedated patients. The prolonged insertion time and perceived difficulty of insertion associated with water exchange have been cited as a barrier to its widespread use.

Aim: To assess the feasibility of learning and using the water exchange method of colonoscopy in a U.S. community practice setting.

Setting: Quality improvement program in nonacademic community endoscopy centers.

Subjects: Patients undergoing sedated diagnostic, surveillance, or screening colonoscopy.

Methods: After direct coaching by a knowledgeable trainer, an experienced colonoscopist initiated colonoscopy using the water method. Whenever >5 min elapsed without advancing the colonoscope, conversion to air insufflation was made to ensure timely completion of the examination.

Primary outcome: Water Method Intention-to-treat (ITT) cecal intubation rate (CIR).

Results: Female patients had a significantly higher rate of past abdominal surgery and a significantly lower ITTCIR. The ITTCIR showed a progressive increase over time in both males and females to 85-90%. Mean insertion time was maintained at 9 to 10 min. The overall CIR was 99%.

Conclusion: Use of water exchange did not preclude cecal intubation upon conversion to usual air insufflation in sedated patients examined by an experienced colonoscopist. With practice ITTCIR increased over time in both male and female patients. Larger volumes of water exchanged were associated with higher ITTCIR and better quality scores of bowel preparation. The data suggest that learning water exchange by a busy colonoscopist in a community practice setting is feasible and outcomes conform to accepted quality standards.

结肠镜的水交换法:美国社区实践中经验丰富的结肠镜医师的学习曲线。
背景:据报道,水交换结肠镜检查可以减少检查不适,并为未镇静或轻度镇静的患者提供补助性清洁。插入时间的延长和与水交换相关的插入困难被认为是其广泛使用的障碍。目的:评估在美国社区实践中学习和使用结肠镜水交换法的可行性。背景:非学术社区内窥镜中心的质量改进计划。受试者:接受镇静诊断、监测或筛查结肠镜检查的患者。方法:在一位知识渊博的培训师的直接指导下,一位经验丰富的结肠镜医师开始使用水法结肠镜检查。每当超过5分钟未推进结肠镜时,转换为充气以确保及时完成检查。主要结局:用水法意向治疗(ITT)盲肠插管率(CIR)。结果:女性患者既往腹部手术率明显较高,ITTCIR明显较低。随着时间的推移,ITTCIR在男性和女性中逐渐增加到85-90%。平均插入时间维持在9 ~ 10分钟,总CIR为99%。结论:在经验丰富的结肠镜检查的镇静患者中,使用水交换并不排除将盲肠插管转换为常规空气注入。随着时间的推移,男性和女性患者的ITTCIR均有所增加。换水量越大,ITTCIR越高,肠道准备质量评分越高。数据表明,由忙碌的结肠镜医生在社区实践环境中学习换水是可行的,结果符合公认的质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信