Quantitative Nature of Social Vulnerability and Autism: An Important Paradigm Shift in the DSM-5 for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

ISRN Neurology Pub Date : 2013-05-08 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/201719
Shinji Ijichi, Naomi Ijichi, Yukina Ijichi, Kazumi Hirotaki, Hisami Sameshima, Yoichi Kawaike, Hirofumi Morioka
{"title":"Quantitative Nature of Social Vulnerability and Autism: An Important Paradigm Shift in the DSM-5 for Autism Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Shinji Ijichi,&nbsp;Naomi Ijichi,&nbsp;Yukina Ijichi,&nbsp;Kazumi Hirotaki,&nbsp;Hisami Sameshima,&nbsp;Yoichi Kawaike,&nbsp;Hirofumi Morioka","doi":"10.1155/2013/201719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV), autistic characteristics in social interaction and communication are described as qualitative impairments. However, the difference between autistics and nonautistics in the draft of the 5th edition (DSM-5 draft) is quantitative rather than qualitative. The word \"qualitative\" is deleted in the draft text, and it is specified that the relation between social demands and individual limited capacities is critical for symptom manifestation (criterion C). Because the proposed levels of support requirement in the draft are mere observable outcomes of social vulnerability, the boundary between level 1 and nonautistic condition is determined by the relation between social demands and individual capacities. In addition to the introduction of the single category (autism spectrum disorder (ASD)) to cover the entire case spectrum, the DSM-5 draft is clearly based on a conviction that ASD is indistinguishable from the normal behavioral range. This concise review provides an explanation for this implicit paradigm shift from qualitative to quantitative. Importantly, the conditional role of social demands for symptom manifestation in the draft can be plausibly interpreted using a unique liability-probability model.</p>","PeriodicalId":14626,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Neurology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"201719"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/201719","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/201719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV), autistic characteristics in social interaction and communication are described as qualitative impairments. However, the difference between autistics and nonautistics in the draft of the 5th edition (DSM-5 draft) is quantitative rather than qualitative. The word "qualitative" is deleted in the draft text, and it is specified that the relation between social demands and individual limited capacities is critical for symptom manifestation (criterion C). Because the proposed levels of support requirement in the draft are mere observable outcomes of social vulnerability, the boundary between level 1 and nonautistic condition is determined by the relation between social demands and individual capacities. In addition to the introduction of the single category (autism spectrum disorder (ASD)) to cover the entire case spectrum, the DSM-5 draft is clearly based on a conviction that ASD is indistinguishable from the normal behavioral range. This concise review provides an explanation for this implicit paradigm shift from qualitative to quantitative. Importantly, the conditional role of social demands for symptom manifestation in the draft can be plausibly interpreted using a unique liability-probability model.

Abstract Image

社会脆弱性与自闭症的定量性质:自闭症谱系障碍的DSM-5中的一个重要范式转变。
在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中,自闭症患者在社会互动和沟通方面的特征被描述为定性缺陷。然而,在第5版草案(DSM-5草案)中,自闭症和非自闭症之间的区别是定量的而不是定性的。草案文本中删除了“定性”一词,并明确指出社会需求与个人有限能力之间的关系对症状表现(标准C)至关重要。由于草案中提议的支持需求水平仅仅是社会脆弱性的可观察结果,因此一级与非自闭症状况之间的界限由社会需求与个人能力之间的关系决定。除了引入单一类别(自闭症谱系障碍(ASD))来涵盖整个病例范围外,DSM-5草案显然是基于一种信念,即ASD与正常行为范围无法区分。这篇简明的评论为这种从定性到定量的隐含范式转变提供了解释。重要的是,草案中症状表现的社会需求的条件作用可以用一个独特的责任-概率模型合理地解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信