Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists.

Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic, Lisen Espeland, Arild Stenvik
{"title":"Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists.","authors":"Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic,&nbsp;Lisen Espeland,&nbsp;Arild Stenvik","doi":"10.11607/ortho.964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To survey retention protocols and need for practical retention guidelines among orthodontists in Norway and to compare the results with similar studies in other countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was mailed to all members of the Norwegian Association of Orthodontists. It included questions about their background and their current retention protocol, as well as their perceived need for common retention guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 77.7% (69.3% males and 30.7% females). The most common maxillary retainer was a combination of a fixed and removable retainer, followed by a clear thermoplastic retainer. In the mandible, a fixed retainer bonded to all anterior teeth was most common (66.4%). Retention in the maxilla lasted 2 to 3 years (34.7%) or 3 to 5 years (23.8%). In the mandible, 41.5% of the orthodontists left the retainer in place for >5 years. When retention lasted more than 3 years, 70% of the orthodontists left the responsibility for retainer checkups to the patients or the general practitioners. The main reason for choosing a certain retention protocol was clinical experience (57.4%). Only 3.5% of the orthodontists based their protocols on information from the literature. Half?of the orthodontists, significantly women, expressed a need for common retention guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Norway, bonded retainers alone were reported to be most commonly used in the mandible, while bonded retainers used in combination with a removable retainer appear to be the most commonly used appliances in the maxilla. This is similar to the most frequently used retainers in other countries, but there are disparities in duration and follow-up protocols. Most female orthodontists desire common retention guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":89450,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","volume":"14 1","pages":"e110-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/ortho.964","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ortho.964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

Aims: To survey retention protocols and need for practical retention guidelines among orthodontists in Norway and to compare the results with similar studies in other countries.

Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to all members of the Norwegian Association of Orthodontists. It included questions about their background and their current retention protocol, as well as their perceived need for common retention guidelines.

Results: The response rate was 77.7% (69.3% males and 30.7% females). The most common maxillary retainer was a combination of a fixed and removable retainer, followed by a clear thermoplastic retainer. In the mandible, a fixed retainer bonded to all anterior teeth was most common (66.4%). Retention in the maxilla lasted 2 to 3 years (34.7%) or 3 to 5 years (23.8%). In the mandible, 41.5% of the orthodontists left the retainer in place for >5 years. When retention lasted more than 3 years, 70% of the orthodontists left the responsibility for retainer checkups to the patients or the general practitioners. The main reason for choosing a certain retention protocol was clinical experience (57.4%). Only 3.5% of the orthodontists based their protocols on information from the literature. Half?of the orthodontists, significantly women, expressed a need for common retention guidelines.

Conclusions: In Norway, bonded retainers alone were reported to be most commonly used in the mandible, while bonded retainers used in combination with a removable retainer appear to be the most commonly used appliances in the maxilla. This is similar to the most frequently used retainers in other countries, but there are disparities in duration and follow-up protocols. Most female orthodontists desire common retention guidelines.

保留:类型,持续时间和需要共同的指导方针。对挪威正畸医生的调查。
目的:调查挪威正畸医生的固位方案和对实际固位指南的需求,并将结果与其他国家的类似研究进行比较。方法:邮寄问卷给挪威正畸医师协会的所有成员。它包括关于他们的背景和他们目前的保留程序的问题,以及他们认为需要共同的保留准则的问题。结果:有效率为77.7%,其中男性69.3%,女性30.7%。最常见的上颌固位器是固定固位器和可移动固位器的组合,其次是透明热塑性固位器。在下颌骨中,固定固位器与所有前牙结合最常见(66.4%)。上颌骨保留时间为2 ~ 3年(34.7%)或3 ~ 5年(23.8%)。在下颌骨,41.5%的正畸医师将固位器放置5年以上。当保留超过3年时,70%的正畸医生将保留器检查的责任留给了患者或全科医生。选择某种保留方案的主要原因是临床经验(57.4%)。只有3.5%的正畸医生根据文献中的信息制定方案。一半吗?正畸医师中,主要是女性,表示有必要制定共同的固位指南。结论:在挪威,粘结固位体是下颌骨最常用的固位体,而粘结固位体与可移动固位体结合使用似乎是上颌骨最常用的矫治器。这与其他国家最常用的固位器相似,但在持续时间和后续协议方面存在差异。大多数女性正畸医生都希望有统一的固位指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信