Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2013-06-01 Epub Date: 2013-05-28 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338
Duck Hyoun Jeong, Han Beom Lee, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim
{"title":"Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.","authors":"Duck Hyoun Jeong,&nbsp;Han Beom Lee,&nbsp;Hyuk Hur,&nbsp;Byung Soh Min,&nbsp;Seung Hyuk Baik,&nbsp;Nam Kyu Kim","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal time between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery for rectal cancer has been debated. This study evaluated the influence of this interval on oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared postoperative complications, pathological downstaging, disease recurrence, and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection <8 weeks (group A, n = 105) to those who had surgery ≥8 weeks (group B, n = 48) after neoadjuvant CRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 patients, 117 (76.5%) were male and 36 (23.5%) were female. Mean age was 57.8 years (range, 28 to 79 years). There was no difference in the rate of sphincter preserving surgery between the two groups (group A, 82.7% vs. group B, 77.6%; P = 0.509). The longer interval group had decreased postoperative complications, although statistical significance was not reached (group A, 28.8% vs. group B, 14.3%; P = 0.068). A total of 111 (group A, 75 [71.4%] and group B, 36 [75%]) patients were downstaged and 26 (group A, 17 [16.2%] and group B, 9 [18%]) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). There was no significant difference in the pCR rate (P = 0.817). The longer interval group experienced significant improvement in the nodal (N) downstaging rate (group A, 46.7% vs. group B, 66.7%; P = 0.024). The local recurrence (P = 0.279), distant recurrence (P = 0.427), disease-free survival (P = 0.967), and overall survival (P = 0.825) rates were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is worth delaying surgical resection for 8 weeks or more after completion of CRT as it is safe and is associated with higher nodal downstaging rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"84 6","pages":"338-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal time between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery for rectal cancer has been debated. This study evaluated the influence of this interval on oncological outcomes.

Methods: We compared postoperative complications, pathological downstaging, disease recurrence, and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection <8 weeks (group A, n = 105) to those who had surgery ≥8 weeks (group B, n = 48) after neoadjuvant CRT.

Results: Of 153 patients, 117 (76.5%) were male and 36 (23.5%) were female. Mean age was 57.8 years (range, 28 to 79 years). There was no difference in the rate of sphincter preserving surgery between the two groups (group A, 82.7% vs. group B, 77.6%; P = 0.509). The longer interval group had decreased postoperative complications, although statistical significance was not reached (group A, 28.8% vs. group B, 14.3%; P = 0.068). A total of 111 (group A, 75 [71.4%] and group B, 36 [75%]) patients were downstaged and 26 (group A, 17 [16.2%] and group B, 9 [18%]) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). There was no significant difference in the pCR rate (P = 0.817). The longer interval group experienced significant improvement in the nodal (N) downstaging rate (group A, 46.7% vs. group B, 66.7%; P = 0.024). The local recurrence (P = 0.279), distant recurrence (P = 0.427), disease-free survival (P = 0.967), and overall survival (P = 0.825) rates were not significantly different.

Conclusion: It is worth delaying surgical resection for 8 weeks or more after completion of CRT as it is safe and is associated with higher nodal downstaging rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后的最佳手术时机。
目的:直肠癌新辅助放化疗(CRT)与手术之间的最佳时间一直存在争议。本研究评估了这段时间间隔对肿瘤预后的影响。方法:比较局部晚期直肠癌手术切除患者的术后并发症、病理降分期、疾病复发和生存率。结果:153例患者中,男性117例(76.5%),女性36例(23.5%)。平均年龄57.8岁(28 ~ 79岁)。两组间保留括约肌手术率无差异(A组为82.7%,B组为77.6%;P = 0.509)。较长间隔组术后并发症减少,但未达到统计学意义(A组28.8% vs. B组14.3%;P = 0.068)。共有111例(A组75例[71.4%],B组36例[75%])患者被降级,26例(A组17例[16.2%],B组9例[18%])患者达到病理完全缓解(pCR)。两组间pCR率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.817)。较长时间间隔组在淋巴结(N)降期率方面有显著改善(A组46.7%,B组66.7%;P = 0.024)。两组局部复发率(P = 0.279)、远处复发率(P = 0.427)、无病生存率(P = 0.967)、总生存率(P = 0.825)无显著性差异。结论:CRT完成后延迟手术切除8周或更长时间是安全的,且与较高的淋巴结降分期率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书