A multiple case series analysis of six variants of attentional bias modification for depression.

ISRN Psychiatry Pub Date : 2013-03-21 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/414170
Anne-Wil Kruijt, Peter Putman, Willem Van der Does
{"title":"A multiple case series analysis of six variants of attentional bias modification for depression.","authors":"Anne-Wil Kruijt,&nbsp;Peter Putman,&nbsp;Willem Van der Does","doi":"10.1155/2013/414170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Attention bias modification (ABM) is a new treatment for affective disorders. A meta-analysis of ABM for anxiety disorders showed that the effect size may be large but the number of studies is low. The working mechanism is still unclear, and little is known about the optimal treatment parameters. ABM for depression is much less studied. A few studies claimed positive effects but the sample sizes are low. Furthermore, the treatment parameters varied widely and differed from the anxiety literature. Aim. To select the most promising version of ABM for depression for further evaluation in clinical trials. Methods. Multiple case series design. We tested six versions of ABM that varied on stimulus duration and training direction. Thirty students with mild to moderate symptoms of depression underwent four sessions of ABM. Change of attentional bias was measured during each session. Generalization of treatment effects and the role of awareness of receiving training were also investigated. Results. None of the investigated versions of ABM had a consistent effect on attentional bias. Changes of attentional bias in individual participants the effects did not generalize to untrained stimuli. Conclusion. It is unlikely that any of these ABM versions will have a specific effect on symptoms in controlled studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14749,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Psychiatry","volume":"2013 ","pages":"414170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/414170","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/414170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background. Attention bias modification (ABM) is a new treatment for affective disorders. A meta-analysis of ABM for anxiety disorders showed that the effect size may be large but the number of studies is low. The working mechanism is still unclear, and little is known about the optimal treatment parameters. ABM for depression is much less studied. A few studies claimed positive effects but the sample sizes are low. Furthermore, the treatment parameters varied widely and differed from the anxiety literature. Aim. To select the most promising version of ABM for depression for further evaluation in clinical trials. Methods. Multiple case series design. We tested six versions of ABM that varied on stimulus duration and training direction. Thirty students with mild to moderate symptoms of depression underwent four sessions of ABM. Change of attentional bias was measured during each session. Generalization of treatment effects and the role of awareness of receiving training were also investigated. Results. None of the investigated versions of ABM had a consistent effect on attentional bias. Changes of attentional bias in individual participants the effects did not generalize to untrained stimuli. Conclusion. It is unlikely that any of these ABM versions will have a specific effect on symptoms in controlled studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抑郁症注意偏倚修正的六种变体的多病例系列分析。
背景。注意偏倚矫正是一种治疗情感性障碍的新方法。一项针对焦虑症的ABM荟萃分析显示,效应量可能很大,但研究数量却很少。其作用机制尚不清楚,最佳处理参数也知之甚少。针对抑郁症的ABM研究要少得多。一些研究声称有积极的影响,但样本量很小。此外,治疗参数差异很大,与焦虑文献不同。的目标。选择最有希望的ABM治疗抑郁症的版本,在临床试验中进一步评估。方法。多箱系列设计。我们测试了六种不同刺激持续时间和训练方向的ABM。30名有轻度到中度抑郁症状的学生接受了四次ABM治疗。在每个疗程中测量注意偏倚的变化。治疗效果的普遍化和接受培训意识的作用也进行了调查。结果。所有被调查的ABM版本都没有对注意偏差产生一致的影响。个体参与者注意偏倚的变化,其影响没有推广到未训练的刺激。结论。在对照研究中,这些ABM的任何一个版本都不太可能对症状有特定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信