Clinical effectiveness of autologous platelet rich fibrin in the management of infrabony periodontal defects

Q2 Medicine
V. Rosamma Joseph , Arun Raghunath , Nitin Sharma
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness of autologous platelet rich fibrin in the management of infrabony periodontal defects","authors":"V. Rosamma Joseph ,&nbsp;Arun Raghunath ,&nbsp;Nitin Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.sdj.2012.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This interventional controlled clinical trial with split mouth design compares the clinical effectiveness of autologous platelet rich fibrin with open flap debridement in the management of infrabony periodontal defects.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifteen patients with paired contralateral infrabony defects were treated with open flap debridement and autologous platelet rich fibrin (experimental group) or open flap debridement alone (control group). The changes in probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, and radiographic defect depth were evaluated. Patient perception regarding pain and discomfort following the procedures and early soft tissue healing responses were assessed by visual analog scales, scored 7 days after the surgical procedures. Final reevaluation was done 1 year after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Baseline clinical and radiographic measurements were comparable between the groups. Reevaluation at 1 year revealed that both treatment modalities resulted in a significant decrease in probing pocket depth, gain in clinical attachment and radiographic bone fill of the defects compared to baseline. Postoperative differences observed between the two groups were 2.27±0.29<!--> <!-->mm (<em>P</em>&lt;0.001) for probing pocket depth, 3.33±0.35<!--> <!-->mm (<em>P</em>&lt;0.001) for clinical attachment level and 1.29±0.32<!--> <!-->mm (<em>P</em>&lt;0.001) for radiographic infrabony defect depth reduction, all in favor of the experimental group. Patient preference was greater and early healing response better for the experimental group as assessed by the visual analog scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that use of platelet rich fibrin is more effective than open flap debridement alone in the management of infrabony periodontal defects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35891,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Dental Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sdj.2012.10.003","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377529112000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Background

This interventional controlled clinical trial with split mouth design compares the clinical effectiveness of autologous platelet rich fibrin with open flap debridement in the management of infrabony periodontal defects.

Methods

Fifteen patients with paired contralateral infrabony defects were treated with open flap debridement and autologous platelet rich fibrin (experimental group) or open flap debridement alone (control group). The changes in probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, and radiographic defect depth were evaluated. Patient perception regarding pain and discomfort following the procedures and early soft tissue healing responses were assessed by visual analog scales, scored 7 days after the surgical procedures. Final reevaluation was done 1 year after surgery.

Results

Baseline clinical and radiographic measurements were comparable between the groups. Reevaluation at 1 year revealed that both treatment modalities resulted in a significant decrease in probing pocket depth, gain in clinical attachment and radiographic bone fill of the defects compared to baseline. Postoperative differences observed between the two groups were 2.27±0.29 mm (P<0.001) for probing pocket depth, 3.33±0.35 mm (P<0.001) for clinical attachment level and 1.29±0.32 mm (P<0.001) for radiographic infrabony defect depth reduction, all in favor of the experimental group. Patient preference was greater and early healing response better for the experimental group as assessed by the visual analog scores.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that use of platelet rich fibrin is more effective than open flap debridement alone in the management of infrabony periodontal defects.

自体富血小板纤维蛋白治疗骨下牙周缺损的临床疗效观察
本研究采用裂口设计,比较了自体富血小板纤维蛋白与开瓣清创治疗骨下牙周缺损的临床效果。方法对15例双侧对侧骨下缺损患者分别采用开放皮瓣清创联合自体富血小板纤维蛋白治疗(实验组)和单独开放皮瓣清创治疗(对照组)。评估探查袋深度、临床附着水平和影像学缺损深度的变化。手术后7天,通过视觉模拟量表评估患者对手术后疼痛和不适的感觉以及早期软组织愈合反应。术后1年复查。结果两组之间的基线临床和放射学测量具有可比性。1年后的重新评估显示,与基线相比,两种治疗方式都显著降低了探测袋深度,增加了临床附着和x线片上的骨填充缺损。两组术后探查袋深度差异为2.27±0.29 mm (P<0.001),临床附着水平差异为3.33±0.35 mm (P<0.001),影像学下骨缺损复位深度差异为1.29±0.32 mm (P<0.001),均优于实验组。通过视觉模拟评分评估,实验组患者的偏好更大,早期愈合反应更好。结论在本研究的局限性下,应用富血小板纤维蛋白治疗骨下牙周缺损比单纯开瓣清创更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Singapore Dental Journal
Singapore Dental Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal covers all fields related to the presentday practice of dentistry, and includes Restorative Dentistry (Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials, Prosthodontics and Endodontics), Preventive Dentistry (Periodontics, Orthodontics, Paediatric Dentistry, Public Health and Health Services), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Oral Pathology. Articles pertaining to dental education and the social, political and economic aspects of dental practice are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信