Standardised measures of needs, stigma and informal care in schizophrenia using a bottom-up, cross-cultural approach.

Mental health in family medicine Pub Date : 2012-06-01
Francisco Torres-Gonzalez, Ariadne Runte-Geidel, Claudio Antonioli, Luciane C Wagner, Dinarte Ballester, Jose Miguel Caldas de Almeida, Emiliano Galende, Benjamín Vicente, Miguel Xavier, Manuel Gómez-Beneyto, Michael B King, Sandra M Saldivia
{"title":"Standardised measures of needs, stigma and informal care in schizophrenia using a bottom-up, cross-cultural approach.","authors":"Francisco Torres-Gonzalez, Ariadne Runte-Geidel, Claudio Antonioli, Luciane C Wagner, Dinarte Ballester, Jose Miguel Caldas de Almeida, Emiliano Galende, Benjamín Vicente, Miguel Xavier, Manuel Gómez-Beneyto, Michael B King, Sandra M Saldivia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background There is a lack of instruments to measure the needs, stigma and informal care of people with schizophrenia that take account of sociocultural variation and patients' and formal and informal carers' opinions and experiences. Aims To develop questionnaires to measure stigma, needs and informal (non-professional) care for people with schizophrenia. Method We undertook the study in seven countries and in English, Spanish and Portuguese. We first held focus group discussions with patients, formal carers (professionals) and informal carers (family and friends) in Spain, the UK, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Venezuela to elicit the main dimensions of needs, stigma and informal care. We then held nominal group discussions about these dimensions with patients, family members and professionals in Spain, Portugal and the UK, to develop the instruments. Results Three hundred and three people participated in 46 focus groups and results were discussed in three nominal groups, each involving eight participants. Three instruments were developed in this iterative process: needs for care (46 items), stigma (38 items) and informal care (20 items). Conclusions These instruments are based on service users' and carers' views and experiences and have cross-cultural validity. They will have application in assessment of outcomes for people with schizophrenia and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":89603,"journal":{"name":"Mental health in family medicine","volume":"9 2","pages":"125-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513705/pdf/MHFM-09-125.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health in family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There is a lack of instruments to measure the needs, stigma and informal care of people with schizophrenia that take account of sociocultural variation and patients' and formal and informal carers' opinions and experiences. Aims To develop questionnaires to measure stigma, needs and informal (non-professional) care for people with schizophrenia. Method We undertook the study in seven countries and in English, Spanish and Portuguese. We first held focus group discussions with patients, formal carers (professionals) and informal carers (family and friends) in Spain, the UK, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Venezuela to elicit the main dimensions of needs, stigma and informal care. We then held nominal group discussions about these dimensions with patients, family members and professionals in Spain, Portugal and the UK, to develop the instruments. Results Three hundred and three people participated in 46 focus groups and results were discussed in three nominal groups, each involving eight participants. Three instruments were developed in this iterative process: needs for care (46 items), stigma (38 items) and informal care (20 items). Conclusions These instruments are based on service users' and carers' views and experiences and have cross-cultural validity. They will have application in assessment of outcomes for people with schizophrenia and their families.

采用自下而上的跨文化方法,对精神分裂症患者的需求、耻辱感和非正式护理进行标准化测量。
背景 目前还缺乏一种工具来测量精神分裂症患者的需求、耻辱感和非正规护理,这种工具要考虑到社会文化差异以及患者、正规和非正规护理者的意见和经验。目的 编制调查问卷,以衡量精神分裂症患者的耻辱感、需求和非正式(非专业)护理。方法 我们在七个国家用英语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语开展了这项研究。我们首先在西班牙、英国、阿根廷、巴西、智利和委内瑞拉与患者、正式照护者(专业人员)和非正式照护者(家人和朋友)进行了焦点小组讨论,以了解需求、耻辱感和非正式照护的主要方面。然后,我们与西班牙、葡萄牙和英国的患者、家庭成员和专业人员就这些方面进行了名义小组讨论,以开发工具。结果 有三百零三人参加了 46 个焦点小组,结果在三个名义小组中进行了讨论,每个小组有八名参与者。在这一反复过程中开发了三种工具:护理需求(46 个项目)、耻辱感(38 个项目)和非正式护理(20 个项目)。结论 这些工具基于服务使用者和照护者的观点和经验,具有跨文化的有效性。它们将被用于精神分裂症患者及其家人的疗效评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信