Effects of a written asthma action plan on caregivers' management of children with asthma: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Ngiap Chuan Tan, Zhaojin Chen, Wern Fern Soo, Agnes Soh Heng Ngoh, Bee Choo Tai
{"title":"Effects of a written asthma action plan on caregivers' management of children with asthma: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.","authors":"Ngiap Chuan Tan, Zhaojin Chen, Wern Fern Soo, Agnes Soh Heng Ngoh, Bee Choo Tai","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caregivers of children with asthma provided with a written asthma action plan (WAAP) are reported to be more confident in their ability to provide care for their child during an asthma exacerbation. However, little is known about how a WAAP impacts on their care processes that contributed to this increased confidence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the effects of a WAAP on caregivers' understanding of asthma symptoms, their use of asthma medications for their children, and acute care visits to consult their physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire survey to caregivers of children with a WAAP (CW) and without a WAAP (CNW) who were followed up at nine public primary care clinics in Singapore. χ(2) test was used to determine the differences in outcomes between the CW and CNW groups, followed by logistic regression to adjust for potential covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 169 caregivers were surveyed (75 CNW, 94 CW). Caregivers in the CW group were more likely to understand bronchoconstriction (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.51, p=0.025), to feel capable (AOR 2.77, p=0.004), safe (AOR 2.63, p=0.004), and had increased confidence (AOR 2.8, p=0.003) to change doses of inhaled medications during an asthma exacerbation. The CW group perceived inhaled asthma medication to be safe (AOR 3.42, p=0.015) and understood the use of controller medication (AOR 3.28, p=0.006). No difference was noted between caregivers in their likelihood to stop medications without consulting their physician, seek acute care consultation, and confidence in self-management of their children's asthma at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WAAP improved caregivers' understanding of the disease and use of inhaled asthma medications during asthma exacerbations but did not affect their decision regarding acute visits to their physician.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Caregivers of children with asthma provided with a written asthma action plan (WAAP) are reported to be more confident in their ability to provide care for their child during an asthma exacerbation. However, little is known about how a WAAP impacts on their care processes that contributed to this increased confidence.

Aims: To determine the effects of a WAAP on caregivers' understanding of asthma symptoms, their use of asthma medications for their children, and acute care visits to consult their physicians.

Methods: A questionnaire survey to caregivers of children with a WAAP (CW) and without a WAAP (CNW) who were followed up at nine public primary care clinics in Singapore. χ(2) test was used to determine the differences in outcomes between the CW and CNW groups, followed by logistic regression to adjust for potential covariates.

Results: A total of 169 caregivers were surveyed (75 CNW, 94 CW). Caregivers in the CW group were more likely to understand bronchoconstriction (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.51, p=0.025), to feel capable (AOR 2.77, p=0.004), safe (AOR 2.63, p=0.004), and had increased confidence (AOR 2.8, p=0.003) to change doses of inhaled medications during an asthma exacerbation. The CW group perceived inhaled asthma medication to be safe (AOR 3.42, p=0.015) and understood the use of controller medication (AOR 3.28, p=0.006). No difference was noted between caregivers in their likelihood to stop medications without consulting their physician, seek acute care consultation, and confidence in self-management of their children's asthma at home.

Conclusions: The WAAP improved caregivers' understanding of the disease and use of inhaled asthma medications during asthma exacerbations but did not affect their decision regarding acute visits to their physician.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

书面哮喘行动计划对护理人员管理哮喘儿童的影响:横断面问卷调查。
背景:据报道,获得书面哮喘行动计划(WAAP)的哮喘患儿护理者对自己在哮喘恶化期间为患儿提供护理的能力更有信心。目的:确定哮喘行动计划对护理人员了解哮喘症状、为孩子使用哮喘药物以及急诊就医的影响:方法:对新加坡九家公立初级保健诊所随访的有 WAAP(CW)和无 WAAP(CNW)儿童的照顾者进行问卷调查。采用χ(2)检验确定CW组和CNW组之间的结果差异,然后采用逻辑回归调整潜在的协变量:共调查了 169 名护理人员(75 名 CNW,94 名 CW)。CW组的护理人员更有可能理解支气管收缩(调整后的几率比(AOR)为4.51,p=0.025),感觉有能力(AOR为2.77,p=0.004)、安全(AOR为2.63,p=0.004),并增强了在哮喘加重期间改变吸入药物剂量的信心(AOR为2.8,p=0.003)。CW组认为吸入式哮喘药物是安全的(AOR 3.42,p=0.015),并了解控制药物的使用(AOR 3.28,p=0.006)。在未经咨询医生而停药的可能性、寻求急症护理咨询的可能性以及在家中自我管理儿童哮喘的信心方面,照顾者之间没有差异:WAAP提高了看护者对疾病的认识以及在哮喘加重期间吸入哮喘药物的使用,但并不影响他们做出急性就诊的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Primary Care Respiratory Journal PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信