Comparative study of shade matching performance of dental students under natural daylight and daylight lamp conditions.

Jitendra J Mete, Shankar P Dange, Arun N Khalikar, Smita P Vaidya
{"title":"Comparative study of shade matching performance of dental students under natural daylight and daylight lamp conditions.","authors":"Jitendra J Mete,&nbsp;Shankar P Dange,&nbsp;Arun N Khalikar,&nbsp;Smita P Vaidya","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As visual shade matching is subject to light source variables, this study was conducted to compare shade matching performance of dental students under two lighting conditions, ie, natural daylight and a commercially available daylight lamp.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two sets of porcelain discs were prepared. The first set consisted of eight porcelain discs of shades A2, A3, A3.5, B2, B3, C2, C3, and D3 of the Vitapan Classical Shade Guide system. The second set consisted of three porcelain discs of shade A2, B2, and C2, having exactly similar L*a*b* values to those of the corresponding shade discs in the first set. Forty dental students were asked to find the closest match for the shades A2, B2, and C2 in the second set from the first set under natural daylight and daylight lamp conditions. The average ΔE between the presented and selected shade was calculated for each participant under the two lighting conditions. The significance was statistically assessed using a paired t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average ΔE between presented and selected shade for individual participants under natural daylight ranged from 0 to 4.84, with a mean of 2.24, while those under daylight lamp conditions ranged from 0 to 3.68, with a mean of 1.14. The difference was statistically significant, with P < 0.0001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daylight lamp conditions significantly improved the shade matching performance of dental students.</p>","PeriodicalId":88322,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","volume":"8 2","pages":"192-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As visual shade matching is subject to light source variables, this study was conducted to compare shade matching performance of dental students under two lighting conditions, ie, natural daylight and a commercially available daylight lamp.

Materials and methods: Two sets of porcelain discs were prepared. The first set consisted of eight porcelain discs of shades A2, A3, A3.5, B2, B3, C2, C3, and D3 of the Vitapan Classical Shade Guide system. The second set consisted of three porcelain discs of shade A2, B2, and C2, having exactly similar L*a*b* values to those of the corresponding shade discs in the first set. Forty dental students were asked to find the closest match for the shades A2, B2, and C2 in the second set from the first set under natural daylight and daylight lamp conditions. The average ΔE between the presented and selected shade was calculated for each participant under the two lighting conditions. The significance was statistically assessed using a paired t test.

Results: The average ΔE between presented and selected shade for individual participants under natural daylight ranged from 0 to 4.84, with a mean of 2.24, while those under daylight lamp conditions ranged from 0 to 3.68, with a mean of 1.14. The difference was statistically significant, with P < 0.0001.

Conclusion: Daylight lamp conditions significantly improved the shade matching performance of dental students.

牙科学生在自然光和日光条件下荫蔽匹配性能的比较研究。
背景:由于视觉阴影匹配受光源变量的影响,本研究比较了牙科学生在自然光和市售日光灯两种照明条件下的阴影匹配性能。材料与方法:制备两套瓷盘。第一套由八个瓷盘组成,分别是Vitapan经典阴影指南系统的A2、A3、A3.5、B2、B3、C2、C3和D3。第二套由A2、B2、C2三个色度瓷盘组成,与第一套对应色度瓷盘的L*a*b*值完全相同。40名牙科学生被要求在自然光和日光条件下找到第二组与第一组最接近的颜色A2、B2和C2。在两种照明条件下,为每个参与者计算呈现和选择的阴影之间的平均值ΔE。采用配对t检验对显著性进行统计学评估。结果:在自然光条件下,个体受试者的呈现阴影与选择阴影之间的平均值ΔE为0 ~ 4.84,平均值为2.24;在日光条件下,个体受试者的呈现阴影与选择阴影之间的平均值ΔE为0 ~ 3.68,平均值为1.14。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.0001。结论:日光灯条件显著提高了牙科学生的阴影匹配能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信