Impact of hepatocyte growth factor on skeletal myoblast transplantation late after myocardial infarction.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Target Insights Pub Date : 2013-05-06 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.4137/DTI.S11802
Stacy B O'Blenes, Audrey W Li, Chris Bowen, Drew Debay, Mohammed Althobaiti, James Clarke
{"title":"Impact of hepatocyte growth factor on skeletal myoblast transplantation late after myocardial infarction.","authors":"Stacy B O'Blenes,&nbsp;Audrey W Li,&nbsp;Chris Bowen,&nbsp;Drew Debay,&nbsp;Mohammed Althobaiti,&nbsp;James Clarke","doi":"10.4137/DTI.S11802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical studies, skeletal myoblast (SKMB) transplantation late after myocardial infarction (MI) has minimal impact on left ventricular (LV) function. This may be related to our previous observation that the extent of SKMB engraftment is minimal in chronic MI when compared to acute MI, which correlates with decreased hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) expression, an important regulator of SKMB function. Here, we investigated delivery of exogenous HGF as a strategy for augmenting SKMB engraftment late after MI. Rats underwent SKMB transplantation 4 weeks after coronary ligation. HGF or vehicle control was delivered intravenously during the subsequent 2 weeks. LV function was assessed by MRI before and 2 weeks after SKMB transplantation. We evaluated HGF delivery, SKMB engraftment, and expression of genes associated with post-MI remodeling. Serum HGF was 6.2 ± 2.4 ng/mL after 2 weeks of HGF infusion (n = 7), but undetectable in controls (n = 7). LV end-diastolic volume and ejection fraction did not improve with HGF treatment (321 ± 27 mm(3), 42% ± 2% vs. 285 ± 33 mm(3), 43% ± 2%, HGF vs. control). MIs were larger in HGF-treated animals (50 ± 7 vs. 30 ± 6 mm(3), P = 0.046), but the volume of engrafted SKMBs or percentage of MIs occupied by SKMBs did not increase with HGF (1.7 ± 0.3 mm(3), 4.7% ± 1.9% vs. 1.4 ± 0.4 mm(3), 5.3% ± 1.6%, HGF vs. control). Expression of genes associated with post-infarction remodeling was not altered by HGF. Delivery of exogenous HGF failed to augment SKMB engraftment and functional recovery in chronic MI. Expression of genes associated with LV remodeling was not altered by HGF. Alternative strategies to enhance engraftment of SKMB must be explored to optimize the clinical efficacy of SKMB transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11326,"journal":{"name":"Drug Target Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/DTI.S11802","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Target Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/DTI.S11802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In clinical studies, skeletal myoblast (SKMB) transplantation late after myocardial infarction (MI) has minimal impact on left ventricular (LV) function. This may be related to our previous observation that the extent of SKMB engraftment is minimal in chronic MI when compared to acute MI, which correlates with decreased hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) expression, an important regulator of SKMB function. Here, we investigated delivery of exogenous HGF as a strategy for augmenting SKMB engraftment late after MI. Rats underwent SKMB transplantation 4 weeks after coronary ligation. HGF or vehicle control was delivered intravenously during the subsequent 2 weeks. LV function was assessed by MRI before and 2 weeks after SKMB transplantation. We evaluated HGF delivery, SKMB engraftment, and expression of genes associated with post-MI remodeling. Serum HGF was 6.2 ± 2.4 ng/mL after 2 weeks of HGF infusion (n = 7), but undetectable in controls (n = 7). LV end-diastolic volume and ejection fraction did not improve with HGF treatment (321 ± 27 mm(3), 42% ± 2% vs. 285 ± 33 mm(3), 43% ± 2%, HGF vs. control). MIs were larger in HGF-treated animals (50 ± 7 vs. 30 ± 6 mm(3), P = 0.046), but the volume of engrafted SKMBs or percentage of MIs occupied by SKMBs did not increase with HGF (1.7 ± 0.3 mm(3), 4.7% ± 1.9% vs. 1.4 ± 0.4 mm(3), 5.3% ± 1.6%, HGF vs. control). Expression of genes associated with post-infarction remodeling was not altered by HGF. Delivery of exogenous HGF failed to augment SKMB engraftment and functional recovery in chronic MI. Expression of genes associated with LV remodeling was not altered by HGF. Alternative strategies to enhance engraftment of SKMB must be explored to optimize the clinical efficacy of SKMB transplantation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肝细胞生长因子对心肌梗死后晚期骨骼肌细胞移植的影响。
在临床研究中,心肌梗死(MI)后晚期骨骼肌母细胞(SKMB)移植对左心室(LV)功能的影响最小。这可能与我们之前的观察有关,即与急性心肌梗死相比,慢性心肌梗死中SKMB的植入程度最小,这与肝细胞生长因子(HGF)表达降低有关,HGF是SKMB功能的重要调节因子。在这里,我们研究了外源性HGF作为心肌梗死后晚期SKMB植入增强策略的递送。大鼠在冠状动脉结扎后4周接受SKMB移植。在随后的2周内静脉给予HGF或载体对照。在SKMB移植前和移植后2周用MRI评估左室功能。我们评估了HGF递送、SKMB植入和心肌梗死后重构相关基因的表达。HGF输注2周后血清HGF为6.2±2.4 ng/mL (n = 7),对照组未检测到HGF (n = 7)。HGF治疗后左室舒张末期容积和射血分数未见改善(321±27 mm(3), 42%±2% vs 285±33 mm(3), 43%±2%,HGF与对照组比较)。HGF处理动物的MIs较大(50±7比30±6 mm(3), P = 0.046),但移植的skmb体积或skmb占据的MIs百分比未随HGF增加(1.7±0.3 mm(3), 4.7%±1.9%比1.4±0.4 mm(3), 5.3%±1.6%,HGF与对照组相比)。HGF未改变梗死后重构相关基因的表达。外源性HGF的传递不能增强慢性心肌梗死患者SKMB的植入和功能恢复。与左室重塑相关的基因表达没有被HGF改变。为了优化SKMB移植的临床疗效,必须探索增强SKMB植入的替代策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Target Insights
Drug Target Insights PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信