Current status and future needs in diagnostics and vaccines for high pathogenicity avian influenza.

Developments in biologicals Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-05-14 DOI:10.1159/000325276
D E Swayne, E Spackman
{"title":"Current status and future needs in diagnostics and vaccines for high pathogenicity avian influenza.","authors":"D E Swayne,&nbsp;E Spackman","doi":"10.1159/000325276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1959, 32 epizootics of high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) have occurred in birds. Rapid detection and accurate identification of HPAI has been critical to controlling such epizootics in poultry. Specific paradigms for the detection and diagnosis of avian influenza virus (AIV) in poultry vary somewhat among different countries and industry compartments depending on specific needs and resources. Importantly, since HPAI and low pathogenicity (LP) AI of the H5 and H7 subtypes are reportable to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), diagnostic procedures are implemented for regulatory purposes and are harmonized to some degree. Most current tests are adequate and have been in use for some time, therefore they have been well validated and presently there is no reported new technology that will completely replace the current tests. However, some modifications, updates or additional tests could be beneficial. The element of AIV diagnostics that is most in need of improvement is in determining the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase subtype specificity of antibody to AIV. Most HPAI epizootics have been eradicated using traditional stamping-out programs, but beginning in 1995, five epizootics have added vaccination as an additional, interim control tool. From 2002-2010, >113 billion doses of AI vaccine have been used in poultry; 95.5% as oil-emulsified, inactivated whole AIV vaccines and 4.5% as live vectored vaccines. The majority of vaccine has been used in the four H5N1 HPAI enzootic countries (China [91%], Egypt [4.7%], Indonesia [2.3%], and Vietnam [1.4%]) where vaccination programs are directed to all poultry. The 10 other countries/regions have used less than 1% of the vaccine, administered in a focused, risk- based approach. Some vaccine \"failures\" have resulted from antigenic drift of field viruses away from the vaccine viruses, but most have resulted from failures in the vaccination process; i.e. failure to adequately administer the vaccine to at risk poultry resulting in lack of population immunity. China, as the major AIV vaccine user, will drive innovation and commercialization of new vaccine technologies, but because of the low-cost to manufacture the current high quality inactivated whole AIV vaccines, such vaccines will continue to dominate the market for the next 10 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":11190,"journal":{"name":"Developments in biologicals","volume":"135 ","pages":"79-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in biologicals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000325276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Since 1959, 32 epizootics of high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) have occurred in birds. Rapid detection and accurate identification of HPAI has been critical to controlling such epizootics in poultry. Specific paradigms for the detection and diagnosis of avian influenza virus (AIV) in poultry vary somewhat among different countries and industry compartments depending on specific needs and resources. Importantly, since HPAI and low pathogenicity (LP) AI of the H5 and H7 subtypes are reportable to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), diagnostic procedures are implemented for regulatory purposes and are harmonized to some degree. Most current tests are adequate and have been in use for some time, therefore they have been well validated and presently there is no reported new technology that will completely replace the current tests. However, some modifications, updates or additional tests could be beneficial. The element of AIV diagnostics that is most in need of improvement is in determining the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase subtype specificity of antibody to AIV. Most HPAI epizootics have been eradicated using traditional stamping-out programs, but beginning in 1995, five epizootics have added vaccination as an additional, interim control tool. From 2002-2010, >113 billion doses of AI vaccine have been used in poultry; 95.5% as oil-emulsified, inactivated whole AIV vaccines and 4.5% as live vectored vaccines. The majority of vaccine has been used in the four H5N1 HPAI enzootic countries (China [91%], Egypt [4.7%], Indonesia [2.3%], and Vietnam [1.4%]) where vaccination programs are directed to all poultry. The 10 other countries/regions have used less than 1% of the vaccine, administered in a focused, risk- based approach. Some vaccine "failures" have resulted from antigenic drift of field viruses away from the vaccine viruses, but most have resulted from failures in the vaccination process; i.e. failure to adequately administer the vaccine to at risk poultry resulting in lack of population immunity. China, as the major AIV vaccine user, will drive innovation and commercialization of new vaccine technologies, but because of the low-cost to manufacture the current high quality inactivated whole AIV vaccines, such vaccines will continue to dominate the market for the next 10 years.

高致病性禽流感诊断和疫苗的现状和未来需求。
自1959年以来,在禽类中发生了32例高致病性禽流感(HPAI)。快速检测和准确鉴定高致病性禽流感对于控制家禽中这类动物流行病至关重要。在家禽中检测和诊断禽流感病毒(AIV)的具体范例在不同国家和行业部门之间有所不同,这取决于具体需求和资源。重要的是,由于H5和H7亚型的高致病性禽流感和低致病性禽流感需要向世界动物卫生组织(OIE)报告,因此出于监管目的实施了诊断程序,并在一定程度上进行了协调。目前的大多数测试都是足够的,并且已经使用了一段时间,因此它们已经得到了很好的验证,目前没有报道的新技术将完全取代目前的测试。然而,一些修改、更新或额外的测试可能是有益的。AIV诊断中最需要改进的是确定AIV抗体的血凝素和神经氨酸酶亚型特异性。大多数高致病性禽流感动物流行病已通过传统的扑灭规划得到根除,但从1995年开始,有5种动物流行病增加了疫苗接种作为额外的临时控制工具。从2002年至2010年,在家禽中使用了1130亿剂禽流感疫苗;95.5%为油乳化灭活疫苗,4.5%为活疫苗。大多数疫苗已在四个H5N1型高致病性禽流感流行国家(中国[91%]、埃及[4.7%]、印度尼西亚[2.3%]和越南[1.4%])使用,这些国家的疫苗接种计划针对所有家禽。其他10个国家/地区使用了不到1%的疫苗,以重点突出、基于风险的方法进行接种。一些疫苗“失败”是由于野场病毒的抗原漂移而远离疫苗病毒,但大多数是由于接种过程中的失败;即未能对有风险的家禽充分接种疫苗,导致缺乏群体免疫力。中国作为主要的AIV疫苗用户,将推动新疫苗技术的创新和商业化,但由于目前高质量的AIV全灭活疫苗的生产成本较低,这类疫苗将在未来10年继续主导市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信