The Transaxial Orientation Is Superior to Both the Short Axis and Horizontal Long Axis Orientations for Determining Right Ventricular Volume and Ejection Fraction Using Simpson's Method with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

ISRN cardiology Pub Date : 2013-04-14 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/268697
Michael K Atalay, Kevin J Chang, David J Grand, Shawn Haji-Momenian, Jason T Machan, Florence H Sheehan
{"title":"The Transaxial Orientation Is Superior to Both the Short Axis and Horizontal Long Axis Orientations for Determining Right Ventricular Volume and Ejection Fraction Using Simpson's Method with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.","authors":"Michael K Atalay,&nbsp;Kevin J Chang,&nbsp;David J Grand,&nbsp;Shawn Haji-Momenian,&nbsp;Jason T Machan,&nbsp;Florence H Sheehan","doi":"10.1155/2013/268697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We sought to determine which of the three orientations is the most reliable and accurate for quantifying right ventricular (RV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) by cardiac magnetic resonance using Simpson's method. We studied 20 patients using short axis (SA), transaxial (TA), and horizontal long axis (HLA) orientations. Three readers independently traced RV endocardial contours at end-diastole and end-systole for each orientation. End-diastolic volumes (EDVs), end-systolic volumes (ESVs), and EF were calculated and compared with the 3D piecewise smooth subdivision surface (PSSS) method. The intraclass correlation coefficients among the 3 readers for EDV, ESV, and EF were 0.92, 0.82, and 0.42, respectively, for SA, 0.95, 0.92, and 0.67 for TA, and 0.85, 0.93, and 0.69 for HLA. For mean data there was no significant difference between TA and PSSS for EDV (-2.6%, 95% CI: -8.2 to 3.3%), ESV (-5.9%, -15.2 to 4.5%), and EF (1.7%, -1.5 to 4.9%). HLA was accurate for ESV (-8.9%, -18.5 to 1.8%) and EF (-0.7%, -3.8 to 2.5%) but significantly underestimated EDV (-9.8, -16.6 to -2.4%). SA was accurate for EDV (0.5%, -6.0 to 7.5%) but overestimated ESV (10.5%, 0.1 to 21.9%) and had poor interrater reliability for EF. Conclusions. The TA orientation provides the most reliable and accurate measures of EDV, ESV, and EF.</p>","PeriodicalId":73519,"journal":{"name":"ISRN cardiology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"268697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/268697","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/268697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We sought to determine which of the three orientations is the most reliable and accurate for quantifying right ventricular (RV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) by cardiac magnetic resonance using Simpson's method. We studied 20 patients using short axis (SA), transaxial (TA), and horizontal long axis (HLA) orientations. Three readers independently traced RV endocardial contours at end-diastole and end-systole for each orientation. End-diastolic volumes (EDVs), end-systolic volumes (ESVs), and EF were calculated and compared with the 3D piecewise smooth subdivision surface (PSSS) method. The intraclass correlation coefficients among the 3 readers for EDV, ESV, and EF were 0.92, 0.82, and 0.42, respectively, for SA, 0.95, 0.92, and 0.67 for TA, and 0.85, 0.93, and 0.69 for HLA. For mean data there was no significant difference between TA and PSSS for EDV (-2.6%, 95% CI: -8.2 to 3.3%), ESV (-5.9%, -15.2 to 4.5%), and EF (1.7%, -1.5 to 4.9%). HLA was accurate for ESV (-8.9%, -18.5 to 1.8%) and EF (-0.7%, -3.8 to 2.5%) but significantly underestimated EDV (-9.8, -16.6 to -2.4%). SA was accurate for EDV (0.5%, -6.0 to 7.5%) but overestimated ESV (10.5%, 0.1 to 21.9%) and had poor interrater reliability for EF. Conclusions. The TA orientation provides the most reliable and accurate measures of EDV, ESV, and EF.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心脏磁共振辛普森法测定右心室容积和射血分数时,横轴位优于短轴位和水平长轴位。
我们试图确定三个方向中哪一个是最可靠和准确的量化右心室(RV)体积和射血分数(EF)的心脏磁共振使用辛普森的方法。我们采用短轴(SA)、跨轴(TA)和水平长轴(HLA)定向对20例患者进行了研究。三位读卡器分别在舒张末期和收缩期末期独立追踪左室心内膜轮廓。计算舒张末期体积(edv)、收缩末期体积(esv)和EF,并与3D分段光滑细分表面(PSSS)法进行比较。EDV、ESV和EF的类内相关系数分别为0.92、0.82和0.42,SA、TA的类内相关系数分别为0.95、0.92和0.67,HLA的类内相关系数分别为0.85、0.93和0.69。对于平均数据,TA和PSSS在EDV (-2.6%, 95% CI: -8.2至3.3%)、ESV(-5.9%, -15.2至4.5%)和EF(1.7%, -1.5至4.9%)方面没有显著差异。HLA对ESV(-8.9%, -18.5 ~ 1.8%)和EF(-0.7%, -3.8 ~ 2.5%)准确,但对EDV(-9.8, -16.6 ~ -2.4%)明显低估。SA对EDV准确(0.5%,-6.0 ~ 7.5%),但对ESV的估计过高(10.5%,0.1 ~ 21.9%),对EF的判读信度较差。结论。TA取向提供了最可靠和准确的EDV、ESV和EF测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信