Effect of belly board with bladder compression device on small bowel displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
Onkologie Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-04-02 DOI:10.1159/000350299
Yoonsun Chung, Hong I Yoon, Ki C Keum, Joo H Kim, Won H Choi, Ki C Nam, Woong S Koom
{"title":"Effect of belly board with bladder compression device on small bowel displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.","authors":"Yoonsun Chung,&nbsp;Hong I Yoon,&nbsp;Ki C Keum,&nbsp;Joo H Kim,&nbsp;Won H Choi,&nbsp;Ki C Nam,&nbsp;Woong S Koom","doi":"10.1159/000350299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a belly board (BB) with the addition of a bladder compression device (BCD) for small bowel (SB) displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) scans of 38 rectal cancer patients positioned on a BB were analyzed and compared with CT scans from the same patients after the addition of a BCD. The BCD moves the inferior border of the BB from the pubic symphysis to the lumbosacral junction. The treated and irradiated volumes of the SB and bladder were compared. The irradiated volume ratio of SB to abdominopelvic cavity (APC) and that of bladder to APC were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the BCD, the treated and irradiated volumes of SB decreased significantly (49.1 ± 48.0 vs. 60.9 ± 50.9 cc, p = 0.006 and 207.5 ± 140.8 vs. 482.8 ± 214.2 cc, p < 0.001, respectively). The irradiated volume ratio of bladder to APC with the BCD increased considerably compared to that without the BCD (25.2 ± 11.5 vs. 18.7 ± 10.5%, p < 0.001), and the ratio of irradiated volume of SB to APC decreased significantly with the BCD (18.8 ± 12.4 vs. 31.8 ± 12.1%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the addition of a BCD to the BB could effectively provide further displacement of SB from the rectal cancer radiotherapy field.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 5","pages":"241-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000350299","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000350299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a belly board (BB) with the addition of a bladder compression device (BCD) for small bowel (SB) displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.

Patients and methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 38 rectal cancer patients positioned on a BB were analyzed and compared with CT scans from the same patients after the addition of a BCD. The BCD moves the inferior border of the BB from the pubic symphysis to the lumbosacral junction. The treated and irradiated volumes of the SB and bladder were compared. The irradiated volume ratio of SB to abdominopelvic cavity (APC) and that of bladder to APC were analyzed.

Results: With the BCD, the treated and irradiated volumes of SB decreased significantly (49.1 ± 48.0 vs. 60.9 ± 50.9 cc, p = 0.006 and 207.5 ± 140.8 vs. 482.8 ± 214.2 cc, p < 0.001, respectively). The irradiated volume ratio of bladder to APC with the BCD increased considerably compared to that without the BCD (25.2 ± 11.5 vs. 18.7 ± 10.5%, p < 0.001), and the ratio of irradiated volume of SB to APC decreased significantly with the BCD (18.8 ± 12.4 vs. 31.8 ± 12.1%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study showed that the addition of a BCD to the BB could effectively provide further displacement of SB from the rectal cancer radiotherapy field.

腹板加膀胱压迫装置对直肠癌放疗场小肠移位的影响。
背景:本研究的目的是探讨腹部板(BB)加膀胱压迫装置(BCD)治疗直肠癌放疗场小肠移位的效果。患者和方法:对38例直肠癌患者的CT扫描结果进行了分析,并与添加BCD后的CT扫描结果进行了比较。BCD将BB的下边界从耻骨联合移动到腰骶交界处。比较处理后和照射后膀胱和SB的体积。分析SB与腹腔(APC)和膀胱(APC)的辐照体积比。结果:经BCD处理的SB体积和辐照后的SB体积分别为49.1±48.0比60.9±50.9 cc (p = 0.006)和207.5±140.8比482.8±214.2 cc (p < 0.001)。有BCD的膀胱与APC的辐照体积比显著高于无BCD的膀胱(25.2±11.5比18.7±10.5%,p < 0.001),有BCD的膀胱与APC的辐照体积比显著低于无BCD的膀胱(18.8±12.4比31.8±12.1%,p < 0.001)。结论:本研究表明,在BB中添加BCD可以有效地进一步位移SB,使其远离直肠癌放疗场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Onkologie
Onkologie 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信