Bodily-visual practices and turn continuation.

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Discourse Processes Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-05-23 DOI:10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761
Cecilia E Ford, Sandra A Thompson, Veronika Drake
{"title":"Bodily-visual practices and turn continuation.","authors":"Cecilia E Ford,&nbsp;Sandra A Thompson,&nbsp;Veronika Drake","doi":"10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper considers points in turn construction where conversation researchers have shown that talk routinely continues beyond possible turn completion, but where we find bodily-visual behavior doing such turn extension work. The bodily-visual behaviors we examine share many features with verbal turn extensions, but we argue that embodied movements have distinct properties that make them well-suited for specific kinds of social action, including stance display and by-play in sequences framed as subsidiary to a simultaneous and related verbal exchange. Our study is in line with a research agenda taking seriously the point made by Goodwin (2000a, b, 2003), Hayashi (2003, 2005), Iwasaki (2009), and others that scholars seeking to account for practices in language and social interaction do themselves a disservice if they privilege the verbal dimension; rather, as suggested in Stivers/Sidnell (2005), each semiotic system/modality, while coordinated with others, has its own organization. With the current exploration of bodily-visual turn extensions, we hope to contribute to a growing understanding of how these different modes of organization are managed concurrently and in concert by interactants in carrying out their everyday social actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11316,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Processes","volume":"49 3-4","pages":"192-212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Processes","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

This paper considers points in turn construction where conversation researchers have shown that talk routinely continues beyond possible turn completion, but where we find bodily-visual behavior doing such turn extension work. The bodily-visual behaviors we examine share many features with verbal turn extensions, but we argue that embodied movements have distinct properties that make them well-suited for specific kinds of social action, including stance display and by-play in sequences framed as subsidiary to a simultaneous and related verbal exchange. Our study is in line with a research agenda taking seriously the point made by Goodwin (2000a, b, 2003), Hayashi (2003, 2005), Iwasaki (2009), and others that scholars seeking to account for practices in language and social interaction do themselves a disservice if they privilege the verbal dimension; rather, as suggested in Stivers/Sidnell (2005), each semiotic system/modality, while coordinated with others, has its own organization. With the current exploration of bodily-visual turn extensions, we hope to contribute to a growing understanding of how these different modes of organization are managed concurrently and in concert by interactants in carrying out their everyday social actions.

身体视觉的练习和转身的延续。
本文考虑了对话研究人员已经表明,谈话通常会在可能的回合完成后继续进行的回合构建点,但我们发现身体视觉行为在进行这种回合扩展工作。我们研究的身体视觉行为与言语转向扩展有许多共同的特征,但我们认为具身动作具有独特的特性,使它们非常适合于特定类型的社会行为,包括作为同时和相关的言语交换的附属序列的姿态展示和表演。我们的研究与古德温(2000年a、b、2003年)、Hayashi(2003年、2005年)、岩崎(2009年)等人提出的一个研究议程是一致的,即学者们在寻求解释语言和社会互动的实践时,如果他们优先考虑语言维度,那将是一种伤害;相反,正如Stivers/Sidnell(2005)所建议的那样,每个符号系统/形态虽然与其他符号系统/形态相互协调,但都有自己的组织。随着目前对身体-视觉转向延伸的探索,我们希望对这些不同的组织模式如何在进行日常社会活动时同时管理和协调做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Discourse Processes is a multidisciplinary journal providing a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas from diverse disciplines sharing a common interest in discourse--prose comprehension and recall, dialogue analysis, text grammar construction, computer simulation of natural language, cross-cultural comparisons of communicative competence, or related topics. The problems posed by multisentence contexts and the methods required to investigate them, although not always unique to discourse, are sufficiently distinct so as to require an organized mode of scientific interaction made possible through the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信