Courtney Vander Pyl , Kourtney Dalzell , Korina Menking-Hoggatt , Thomas Ledergerber , Luis Arroyo , Tatiana Trejos
{"title":"Transfer and persistence studies of inorganic and organic gunshot residues using synthetic skin membranes","authors":"Courtney Vander Pyl , Kourtney Dalzell , Korina Menking-Hoggatt , Thomas Ledergerber , Luis Arroyo , Tatiana Trejos","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2023.100498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The complex nature of gunshot residue (GSR) transfer and persistence introduces challenges and skepticism in its evidential value. Therefore, this work evaluates the behavior and movement of inorganic and organic gunshot residues to assist in the evidence interpretation. The study encompassed over 650 samples, including 247 collections from human skin after firing a gun and 405 synthetic skin and fabric substrates after depositing a characterized pGSR/OGSR standard. Transfer and persistence experiments were evaluated on different substrates (hands, ears, nostrils, forehead, hair, fabrics, and synthetic skin), at different times after firing (0 to 6 h), and common post-shooting activities (rubbing hands, handshaking, running, washing hands and fabrics). Ground truth knowledge of particle counts and analyte concentrations was used to calculate the recovery for inorganic and organic constituents from clothing and a synthetic skin membrane (StratM®). Authentic shooter skin samples were compared to synthetic skin to establish the validity of skin-substitute models. During controlled experiments, inorganic particles persisted longer than OGSR on inactive samples (9% and < 25% loss at 6 hrs, respectively), but inorganic particles were more prone to secondary transfer than OGSR (up to 35% vs. 0% transfer, respectively). High percentages of particles were lost during vigorous activities like washing hands (99% loss) or rubbing hands (55% loss). In comparison, less loss was observed during the same studies for OGSR (<21%). This study offers a deeper understanding of gunshot residue transfer and persistence mechanisms that can assist analysts and investigators in improving sample collection and interpretation of evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170923000346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The complex nature of gunshot residue (GSR) transfer and persistence introduces challenges and skepticism in its evidential value. Therefore, this work evaluates the behavior and movement of inorganic and organic gunshot residues to assist in the evidence interpretation. The study encompassed over 650 samples, including 247 collections from human skin after firing a gun and 405 synthetic skin and fabric substrates after depositing a characterized pGSR/OGSR standard. Transfer and persistence experiments were evaluated on different substrates (hands, ears, nostrils, forehead, hair, fabrics, and synthetic skin), at different times after firing (0 to 6 h), and common post-shooting activities (rubbing hands, handshaking, running, washing hands and fabrics). Ground truth knowledge of particle counts and analyte concentrations was used to calculate the recovery for inorganic and organic constituents from clothing and a synthetic skin membrane (StratM®). Authentic shooter skin samples were compared to synthetic skin to establish the validity of skin-substitute models. During controlled experiments, inorganic particles persisted longer than OGSR on inactive samples (9% and < 25% loss at 6 hrs, respectively), but inorganic particles were more prone to secondary transfer than OGSR (up to 35% vs. 0% transfer, respectively). High percentages of particles were lost during vigorous activities like washing hands (99% loss) or rubbing hands (55% loss). In comparison, less loss was observed during the same studies for OGSR (<21%). This study offers a deeper understanding of gunshot residue transfer and persistence mechanisms that can assist analysts and investigators in improving sample collection and interpretation of evidence.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.