Chronic temporomandibular disorders are not necessarily associated with a compromised endogenous analgesic system.

Pauline H Garrett, Eleni Sarlani, Edward G Grace, Joel D Greenspan
{"title":"Chronic temporomandibular disorders are not necessarily associated with a compromised endogenous analgesic system.","authors":"Pauline H Garrett,&nbsp;Eleni Sarlani,&nbsp;Edward G Grace,&nbsp;Joel D Greenspan","doi":"10.11607/jop.943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test whether temporomandibular disorders (TMD) case-control differences in conditioned pain modulation (CPM) exist, using a mechanically evoked temporal summation (TS) model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of 10 repetitive, mildly noxious, mechanical stimuli were applied to the fingers of 30 women with TMD, who had a primary diagnosis of masticatory myofascial pain, and 30 age-matched healthy women. The subjects rated the pain intensity caused by the 1st, 5th, and 10th stimuli in the series. To evaluate CPM, the same series of mechanical stimulations were applied with concomitant exposure of the other hand to a painfully cold water bath. Statistical inferences were based on t tests, chi-square tests, or analysis of variance (ANOVA), as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain ratings increased significantly with stimulus repetition (P < .01) and CPM significantly reduced TS of pain (P < .01). Of particular note, both groups showed very similar degrees of CPM, with no significant group difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Painful TMD is not necessarily associated with a compromised ability to engage the endogenous analgesic system in an experimental setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 2","pages":"142-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.943","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Aims: To test whether temporomandibular disorders (TMD) case-control differences in conditioned pain modulation (CPM) exist, using a mechanically evoked temporal summation (TS) model.

Methods: A series of 10 repetitive, mildly noxious, mechanical stimuli were applied to the fingers of 30 women with TMD, who had a primary diagnosis of masticatory myofascial pain, and 30 age-matched healthy women. The subjects rated the pain intensity caused by the 1st, 5th, and 10th stimuli in the series. To evaluate CPM, the same series of mechanical stimulations were applied with concomitant exposure of the other hand to a painfully cold water bath. Statistical inferences were based on t tests, chi-square tests, or analysis of variance (ANOVA), as appropriate.

Results: Pain ratings increased significantly with stimulus repetition (P < .01) and CPM significantly reduced TS of pain (P < .01). Of particular note, both groups showed very similar degrees of CPM, with no significant group difference.

Conclusion: Painful TMD is not necessarily associated with a compromised ability to engage the endogenous analgesic system in an experimental setting.

慢性颞下颌紊乱并不一定与内源性镇痛系统受损有关。
目的:采用机械诱发时间累加(TS)模型,检验条件疼痛调节(CPM)是否存在颞下颌紊乱(TMD)病例对照差异。方法:对30例初步诊断为咀嚼肌筋膜疼痛的TMD女性和30例年龄相匹配的健康女性的手指进行一系列10次重复性、轻度毒性的机械刺激。受试者对系列中第1、5、10次刺激引起的疼痛强度进行评分。为了评估CPM,采用相同的机械刺激系列,同时将另一只手暴露在痛苦的冷水浴中。统计推断基于t检验、卡方检验或方差分析(ANOVA),视情况而定。结果:随着刺激次数的增加,疼痛评分明显增加(P < 0.01), CPM显著降低疼痛TS (P < 0.01)。特别值得注意的是,两组的CPM程度非常相似,没有显著的组间差异。结论:在实验环境中,疼痛性TMD并不一定与内源性镇痛系统的功能受损有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信