Genetic diagnosis in recently transfused patients.

Ana C Mardini, Fabiana Q Mayer, Rodrigo Rodenbusch, Ursula Matte, Maria L Saraiva-Pereira
{"title":"Genetic diagnosis in recently transfused patients.","authors":"Ana C Mardini,&nbsp;Fabiana Q Mayer,&nbsp;Rodrigo Rodenbusch,&nbsp;Ursula Matte,&nbsp;Maria L Saraiva-Pereira","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827630b8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analysis of recently transfused patients is usually postponed to avoid spurious results because of contamination with donor's cells. However, little is known about the extent of this influence in routine molecular diagnostic tests. To elucidate this question, we tested a mix of blood samples from 2 α-1-antitrypsin-deficient patients diagnosed as Pi*Z homozygous with 1 normal donor at 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, and 1:30 proportions. Human identification panel and Pi*Z allele detection were used to establish the detection limit of a blood mixture. Mixtures of 1:1 and 1:10 were easily detected with both techniques, whereas for 1:30, it was necessary to change the equipment settings to identify the mixture. Moreover, the heterozygous pattern observed for the mixtures on Pi*Z genotyping was weaker at this level of mixture. We further evaluated the degree of mixture detectable in 20 transfused patients who received 1 blood unit (concentrate of irradiated or nonirradiated red blood cells) using the human identification panel. Two days after the transfusion, the presence of the donor's markers was not detected, suggesting that after this time point the levels of admixture are below 1:30. The methods applied in the present study showed adequate sensitivity to identify alleles of the so-called \"smaller population\" of cells up to 3%, approximately. The same result was obtained in a \"diagnostic situation,\" in which the blood mixture was submitted to a PCR-RFLP protocol to detect a mutation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"22 2","pages":"123-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827630b8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827630b8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Analysis of recently transfused patients is usually postponed to avoid spurious results because of contamination with donor's cells. However, little is known about the extent of this influence in routine molecular diagnostic tests. To elucidate this question, we tested a mix of blood samples from 2 α-1-antitrypsin-deficient patients diagnosed as Pi*Z homozygous with 1 normal donor at 1:1, 1:10, 1:20, and 1:30 proportions. Human identification panel and Pi*Z allele detection were used to establish the detection limit of a blood mixture. Mixtures of 1:1 and 1:10 were easily detected with both techniques, whereas for 1:30, it was necessary to change the equipment settings to identify the mixture. Moreover, the heterozygous pattern observed for the mixtures on Pi*Z genotyping was weaker at this level of mixture. We further evaluated the degree of mixture detectable in 20 transfused patients who received 1 blood unit (concentrate of irradiated or nonirradiated red blood cells) using the human identification panel. Two days after the transfusion, the presence of the donor's markers was not detected, suggesting that after this time point the levels of admixture are below 1:30. The methods applied in the present study showed adequate sensitivity to identify alleles of the so-called "smaller population" of cells up to 3%, approximately. The same result was obtained in a "diagnostic situation," in which the blood mixture was submitted to a PCR-RFLP protocol to detect a mutation.

近期输血患者的基因诊断。
对最近输血的病人的分析通常被推迟,以避免由于供者细胞的污染而导致错误的结果。然而,这种影响在常规分子诊断试验中的程度尚不清楚。为了阐明这个问题,我们测试了2名α-1-抗胰蛋白酶缺陷患者的血液样本,诊断为Pi*Z纯合子,与1名正常供者按1:1,1:10,1:20和1:30的比例混合。采用人类鉴定面板和Pi*Z等位基因检测建立血液混合物的检出限。对于1:1和1:10的混合物,这两种技术都很容易检测到,而对于1:30的混合物,则需要改变设备设置来识别混合物。此外,在此水平下,杂交组合在Pi*Z基因分型上的杂合模式较弱。我们进一步评估了20名接受了1个血液单位(辐照或未辐照红细胞浓缩物)输血的患者使用人体识别板检测到的混合程度。输血两天后,没有检测到供体标记物的存在,这表明在这个时间点之后混合物的水平低于1:30。本研究中应用的方法显示出足够的灵敏度,可以识别所谓的“较小群体”细胞的等位基因,大约为3%。在“诊断情况”中也获得了相同的结果,其中将血液混合物提交给PCR-RFLP协议以检测突变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信