Evaluation of 2-year experience with EGFR mutation analysis of small diagnostic samples.

Katarina Hlinkova, Pavel Babal, Peter Berzinec, Ivan Majer, Zdenka Mikle-Barathova, Barbora Piackova, Denisa Ilencikova
{"title":"Evaluation of 2-year experience with EGFR mutation analysis of small diagnostic samples.","authors":"Katarina Hlinkova,&nbsp;Pavel Babal,&nbsp;Peter Berzinec,&nbsp;Ivan Majer,&nbsp;Zdenka Mikle-Barathova,&nbsp;Barbora Piackova,&nbsp;Denisa Ilencikova","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827e6984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mutation analysis of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene is an essential part of the diagnostic algorithm in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Small biopsies or cytology specimens represent >80% of the available diagnostic material. EGFR mutation analyses were realized on 835 samples (675 cytology specimens, 151 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks, 5 tumors, and 4 pleural effusions). EGFR mutation analysis was performed by high-resolution melting analysis in combination with mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction and sequencing analysis. Because of increased risk of inaccuracy in histology diagnosis of small specimens, all subtypes of NSCLC were analyzed. EGFR mutations were detected in 83 cases (10%). EGFR mutation testing failed in 5% (42/835) and was associated with poor cellularity, low percentage of tumor cells, and bad quality of DNA. Although 281 samples were evaluated as insufficient material (poor cellularity and/or unrepresentative tumor content), mutation rates were 7%. Although only adenocarcinomas or NSCLC-not otherwise specified are recommended for EGFR mutation testing, EGFR mutations in 11% of the large cell carcinomas and 4% of the squamous cell carcinomas were observed. Our results indicate that defined algorithm for EGFR testing of small diagnostic samples is sensitive, fast, and suitable even for samples with poor cellularity. The results of this testing should be evaluated depending on tumor content and DNA quality for each sample individually. At the conclusion of our results, we recommend to realize EGFR mutation analysis of small diagnostic samples regardless of the histologic subtypes of NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"22 2","pages":"70-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827e6984","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31827e6984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Mutation analysis of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene is an essential part of the diagnostic algorithm in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Small biopsies or cytology specimens represent >80% of the available diagnostic material. EGFR mutation analyses were realized on 835 samples (675 cytology specimens, 151 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks, 5 tumors, and 4 pleural effusions). EGFR mutation analysis was performed by high-resolution melting analysis in combination with mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction and sequencing analysis. Because of increased risk of inaccuracy in histology diagnosis of small specimens, all subtypes of NSCLC were analyzed. EGFR mutations were detected in 83 cases (10%). EGFR mutation testing failed in 5% (42/835) and was associated with poor cellularity, low percentage of tumor cells, and bad quality of DNA. Although 281 samples were evaluated as insufficient material (poor cellularity and/or unrepresentative tumor content), mutation rates were 7%. Although only adenocarcinomas or NSCLC-not otherwise specified are recommended for EGFR mutation testing, EGFR mutations in 11% of the large cell carcinomas and 4% of the squamous cell carcinomas were observed. Our results indicate that defined algorithm for EGFR testing of small diagnostic samples is sensitive, fast, and suitable even for samples with poor cellularity. The results of this testing should be evaluated depending on tumor content and DNA quality for each sample individually. At the conclusion of our results, we recommend to realize EGFR mutation analysis of small diagnostic samples regardless of the histologic subtypes of NSCLC.

2年小诊断样本EGFR突变分析经验评价
表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变分析是转移性或复发性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者诊断算法的重要组成部分。小活检或细胞学标本占可用诊断材料的80%以上。对835份样本(675份细胞学标本、151份福尔马林固定石蜡包埋块、5份肿瘤和4份胸腔积液)进行EGFR突变分析。EGFR突变分析采用高分辨率熔融分析结合突变富集聚合酶链反应和测序分析。由于小样本的组织学诊断不准确的风险增加,因此对所有NSCLC亚型进行了分析。83例(10%)检测到EGFR突变。EGFR突变检测失败率为5%(42/835),与细胞质量差、肿瘤细胞百分比低和DNA质量差有关。虽然281份样本被评估为材料不足(细胞质量差和/或肿瘤含量不具代表性),但突变率为7%。虽然只有腺癌或非小细胞肺癌才被推荐进行EGFR突变检测,但在11%的大细胞癌和4%的鳞状细胞癌中观察到EGFR突变。我们的研究结果表明,用于小诊断样本的EGFR检测的定义算法灵敏,快速,甚至适用于细胞性差的样本。这种测试的结果应该根据每个样本的肿瘤含量和DNA质量进行评估。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议无论NSCLC的组织学亚型如何,都要实现小诊断样本的EGFR突变分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信