{"title":"Accountable care organizations: back to the future?","authors":"Lawton R Burns, Mark V Pauly","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are networks of providers that assume risk for the quality and total cost of the care they deliver. Public policymakers and private insurers hope that ACOs will achieve the elusive \"triple aim\" of improving quality of care, improving population health, and reducing costs. The model is still evolving, but the premise is that ACOs will accomplish these aims by coordinating care, managing chronic disease, and aligning financial incentives for hospitals and physicians. If this sounds familiar, it may be because the integrated care networks of the 1990s tried some of the same things, and mostly failed in their attempts. This Issue Brief summarizes the similarities and differences between the new ACOs and the integrated delivery networks of the 1990s, and presents the authors' analysis of the likely success of these new organizations in affecting the costs and quality of health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":85087,"journal":{"name":"LDI issue brief","volume":"18 2","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LDI issue brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are networks of providers that assume risk for the quality and total cost of the care they deliver. Public policymakers and private insurers hope that ACOs will achieve the elusive "triple aim" of improving quality of care, improving population health, and reducing costs. The model is still evolving, but the premise is that ACOs will accomplish these aims by coordinating care, managing chronic disease, and aligning financial incentives for hospitals and physicians. If this sounds familiar, it may be because the integrated care networks of the 1990s tried some of the same things, and mostly failed in their attempts. This Issue Brief summarizes the similarities and differences between the new ACOs and the integrated delivery networks of the 1990s, and presents the authors' analysis of the likely success of these new organizations in affecting the costs and quality of health care.
问责医疗组织(Accountable Care Organizations, ACOs)是由医疗服务提供者组成的网络,他们承担医疗服务质量和总成本的风险。公共政策制定者和私营保险公司希望ACOs能够实现难以实现的“三重目标”:提高医疗质量、改善人口健康和降低成本。该模式仍在不断发展,但前提是ACOs将通过协调护理、管理慢性病和调整医院和医生的财政激励措施来实现这些目标。如果这听起来很熟悉,那可能是因为20世纪90年代的综合护理网络尝试了一些同样的事情,但大多数都失败了。本问题摘要总结了新ACOs与1990年代综合交付网络之间的异同,并介绍了作者对这些新组织在影响医疗保健成本和质量方面可能取得成功的分析。