Reliability of Family Proxy Data for Studies of Malignant Mesothelioma: Results from the ATSDR Pilot Surveillance.

ISRN oncology Pub Date : 2013-03-28 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/325409
Natalia Melnikova, Jennifer Wu, Wendy Kaye, Maureen Orr
{"title":"Reliability of Family Proxy Data for Studies of Malignant Mesothelioma: Results from the ATSDR Pilot Surveillance.","authors":"Natalia Melnikova,&nbsp;Jennifer Wu,&nbsp;Wendy Kaye,&nbsp;Maureen Orr","doi":"10.1155/2013/325409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective. To evaluate the validity of proxy interviews in obtaining information on persons with rapidly fatal diseases such as malignant mesothelioma (MM). Methods. Persons with MM diagnosed in 2002 through 2005 in New York and New Jersey and 1997-2004 in Wisconsin were eligible for inclusion in the project. Persons with MM and their family member proxy were interviewed using the same questionnaire designed by ATSDR to collect information on potential direct or indirect occupational and environmental exposure to asbestos, genetic, and health related malignancy predisposition, and exposure to tobacco products. Descriptive statistics and the McNemar/Durkalski test were used to analyze 33 matched pairs. Results. The overall study confirmed a generally high ability of proxies to give interviews of comparable quality and completeness when asked dichotomous questions. The reliability of information collected from proxies varied by topic and family relationship. Conclusions. Family proxy interviews, using dichotomous responses, can serve as an acceptable source of information about health and exposure-related risk factors for MM.</p>","PeriodicalId":89399,"journal":{"name":"ISRN oncology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"325409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/325409","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/325409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the validity of proxy interviews in obtaining information on persons with rapidly fatal diseases such as malignant mesothelioma (MM). Methods. Persons with MM diagnosed in 2002 through 2005 in New York and New Jersey and 1997-2004 in Wisconsin were eligible for inclusion in the project. Persons with MM and their family member proxy were interviewed using the same questionnaire designed by ATSDR to collect information on potential direct or indirect occupational and environmental exposure to asbestos, genetic, and health related malignancy predisposition, and exposure to tobacco products. Descriptive statistics and the McNemar/Durkalski test were used to analyze 33 matched pairs. Results. The overall study confirmed a generally high ability of proxies to give interviews of comparable quality and completeness when asked dichotomous questions. The reliability of information collected from proxies varied by topic and family relationship. Conclusions. Family proxy interviews, using dichotomous responses, can serve as an acceptable source of information about health and exposure-related risk factors for MM.

恶性间皮瘤研究家庭代理数据的可靠性:来自ATSDR试点监测的结果。
目标。评估代理访谈在获取恶性间皮瘤(MM)等快速致命疾病患者信息方面的有效性。方法。2002年至2005年期间在纽约和新泽西州以及1997年至2004年期间在威斯康辛州诊断为MM的人有资格纳入该项目。使用ATSDR设计的相同问卷对MM患者及其家庭成员代理人进行访谈,以收集有关石棉潜在的直接或间接职业和环境暴露、遗传和健康相关恶性肿瘤易感以及烟草制品暴露的信息。采用描述性统计和McNemar/Durkalski检验对33对配对进行分析。结果。整体研究证实了一个普遍较高的代理能力,以提供可比较的质量和完整性访谈时,被问及二分法问题。从代理收集的信息的可靠性因主题和家庭关系而异。结论。采用二分法回答的家庭代理访谈可以作为关于MM的健康和接触相关风险因素的可接受的信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信