Surgical treatment for acute small intestinal obstruction caused by Parascaris equorum infection in 15 horses (2002-2011).

A J Tatz, G Segev, A Steinman, D Berlin, J Milgram, G Kelmer
{"title":"Surgical treatment for acute small intestinal obstruction caused by Parascaris equorum infection in 15 horses (2002-2011).","authors":"A J Tatz,&nbsp;G Segev,&nbsp;A Steinman,&nbsp;D Berlin,&nbsp;J Milgram,&nbsp;G Kelmer","doi":"10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00607.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Reasons for performing study: </strong>There is a consensus in the veterinary literature that Parascaris equorum (ascarid) impaction carries a poor prognosis. Hence surgery is often delayed and foals are often subjected to euthanasia after diagnosis of ascarid impaction is established. Our clinical impression was that ascarid impaction carries a better prognosis than previously reported.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our expectation was that manually evacuating the impaction into the caecum, thus refraining from opening the small intestine, would improve the prognosis for survival of horses with ascarid impaction. The aim of this study was to examine medical records of horses treated surgically for ascarid impaction, record their clinical findings and evaluate the association of outcome with the method of relieving the impaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of all horses presented to our hospital between October 2002 and December 2011 that underwent exploratory celiotomy for ascarid impaction were reviewed. Information retrieved from the medical record included surgical findings, surgical technique, complications, short- and long-term survival. The association between categorical variables was assessed using the Fisher's exact test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen horses fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eighty percent of horses (12/15) survived to discharge and 60% (6/10) survived for at least one year. Five horses are doing well but are still in convalescence. Horses that underwent small intestinal enterotomy or resection and anastomosis (n = 5) were less likely to survive to discharge (P = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, manual evacuation of ascarid impaction into the caecum, while refraining from opening the small intestine resulted in significantly improved survival in horses with ascarid impaction.</p><p><strong>Potential relevance: </strong>Refraining from opening the small intestine may be the key to improving surgical outcome in horses with ascarid impaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11801,"journal":{"name":"Equine veterinary journal. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00607.x","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine veterinary journal. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00607.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Reasons for performing study: There is a consensus in the veterinary literature that Parascaris equorum (ascarid) impaction carries a poor prognosis. Hence surgery is often delayed and foals are often subjected to euthanasia after diagnosis of ascarid impaction is established. Our clinical impression was that ascarid impaction carries a better prognosis than previously reported.

Objectives: Our expectation was that manually evacuating the impaction into the caecum, thus refraining from opening the small intestine, would improve the prognosis for survival of horses with ascarid impaction. The aim of this study was to examine medical records of horses treated surgically for ascarid impaction, record their clinical findings and evaluate the association of outcome with the method of relieving the impaction.

Methods: The medical records of all horses presented to our hospital between October 2002 and December 2011 that underwent exploratory celiotomy for ascarid impaction were reviewed. Information retrieved from the medical record included surgical findings, surgical technique, complications, short- and long-term survival. The association between categorical variables was assessed using the Fisher's exact test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Fifteen horses fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eighty percent of horses (12/15) survived to discharge and 60% (6/10) survived for at least one year. Five horses are doing well but are still in convalescence. Horses that underwent small intestinal enterotomy or resection and anastomosis (n = 5) were less likely to survive to discharge (P = 0.022).

Conclusions: In our study, manual evacuation of ascarid impaction into the caecum, while refraining from opening the small intestine resulted in significantly improved survival in horses with ascarid impaction.

Potential relevance: Refraining from opening the small intestine may be the key to improving surgical outcome in horses with ascarid impaction.

马副蛔虫感染致急性小肠梗阻15例的外科治疗(2002-2011)。
开展研究的原因:在兽医文献中有一个共识,即马寄生虫(蛔虫)嵌塞预后不良。因此,手术经常被推迟,马驹经常在蛔虫嵌塞诊断后接受安乐死。我们的临床印象是蛔虫嵌塞的预后比以前报道的要好。目的:我们的期望是通过人工将嵌塞物排出到盲肠中,从而避免打开小肠,将改善蛔虫嵌塞马的生存预后。本研究的目的是检查手术治疗马蛔虫嵌塞的医疗记录,记录其临床表现,并评估结果与解除嵌塞方法的关系。方法:回顾2002年10月至2011年12月至我院收治的所有因蛔虫嵌塞行探查性腹腔切开术的马的病历。从医疗记录中检索的信息包括手术结果、手术技术、并发症、短期和长期生存。分类变量之间的关联使用Fisher精确检验进行评估。P值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:15匹马符合纳入标准。80%的马(12/15)存活至出院,60%(6/10)存活至少一年。五匹马状况良好,但仍处于恢复期。接受小肠切开或切除吻合的马(n = 5)存活出院的可能性较低(P = 0.022)。结论:在我们的研究中,在不打开小肠的情况下,将蛔虫嵌塞物手动排入盲肠,可以显著提高蛔虫嵌塞马的存活率。潜在相关性:避免打开小肠可能是改善蛔虫嵌塞马手术结果的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信